1. Polarized Opinion Formulation and U.S. Gun Control Laws

2. Introduction Definitions The Positions How Opinions Are Formed Random Survey Sample Those in Favor Those Opposed Possible Solutions Conclusion

3. Definitions What does polarized mean? What do I mean by Gun Control Laws? Why is this topic selected for this presentation?

4. The Positions Two Polarized Viewpoints Rigid gun control would remove all guns from private ownership Or, no gun control laws in place at all.

5. How Opinions are Formed Personal Experience Familial Loyalty Political Position Religious Beliefs Presentation Upbringing Education

6. Random Survey Sample 597 Respondents to online survey 415 of 597 polled as in favor of minimal gun control laws 327 of 597 polled said they were heavily conservative

7. Those in Favor The Relationship between gun ownership and firearm homicide rates in the United States, 1981–2010 Investigating the link between gun possession and gun assault All references appear on the final slide

8. Those Opposed The case for more guns (and more gun control) Would banning firearms reduce murder and suicide? An evaluation of a multiyear gun buy-back programme: re-examining the impact on violent crimes. All references appear on the final slide

9. Possible Solutions Less extremism in the media Educated participants in discussion Open discourse with opposing party Open-minded and tolerant discussion Objectivity when discussing such a passionate topic

10. Conclusion Polarized opinion surrounds passionate topics Gun control laws are hotly debated Studies find conflicting facts There is middle ground between extreme viewpoints With more objectivity and tolerant discussion, a compromise can be found

11. References Branas, C., Richmond, T., Culhane, D., Ten Have, T., & Wiebe, D. (2009). Investigating the link between gun possession and gun assault. American journal of public health, 99(11), 2034-2040. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.143099 Goldberg, J. (2012). The case for more guns (and more gun control). Atlantic monthly. (10727825), 310(5), 68. Hahn, R., Bilukha, O., Crosby, A., Fullilove, M., Liberman, A., Moscicki, E., Snyder, S., Tuma, F., & Briss, P. (2003). First reports evaluating the effectiveness of strategies for preventing violence: Firearms laws. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5214a2.htm Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment & decision making, 8(4), 407-424 Kates, D. B., & Mauser, G. (2007). Would banning firearms reduce murder and suicide? Harvard journal of law & public policy, 30(2), 649-694. Kleck, G. (1991). Guns and violence: A summary of the field. Retrieved from http://www.largo.org/klecksum.html Massey, C. (2000). Guns, extremists, and the constitution. Washington and Lee law review, 57(4), 1095-1138. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/236282347?accountid=32521 Phillips, S. W., Dae-Young, K., & Sobol, J. J. (2013). An evaluation of a multiyear gun buy-back programme: re-examining the impact on violent crimes. International journal of police science & management, 15(3), 246-261. doi:10.1350/ijps.2013.15.3.315 Siegel, M., Ross, C. S., & King III, C. (2013). The relationship between gun ownership and firearm homicide rates in the United States, 1981-2010. American journal of public health, 103(11), 2098-2105. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301409 Squires, P. (2002). Gun culture or gun control?: Firearms, violence and society. London: Routledge.