1. CIRTL Network Administrative Meeting www.cirtl.net/networkgroup Wednesday, May 7, 2014 12:00-1:00 ET/ 11:00-12:00 CT/ 10:00-9:00 MT / 9:00-8:00 PT This meeting will be recorded Begin by running the Audio Setup Wizard Select : Tools>Audio> Audio Setup Wizard or click the audio setup wizard button Backup Call-in: Number: 1 (571) 392-7703 Passcode: 931 749 952 188#

2. Agenda Announcements: Sharing participant information – changes in IRB rules 2015 Forum Program Committee TAMU CIRTL video Remaining Network Evaluation Presentation Dates Other? Topic 1: 2014 Institutional Portraits Topic 2: 2014-15 Subcontract Scope of Work Topic 3: Cross-Network Operations

3. TAMU CIRTL Video

4. Network Meeting Evaluation Presentations May 2014 - Northwestern, TAMU, Vandy June 2014 - Cornell, Mizzou, CUB July 2014 - UGA, UR, UMASS August 2014: Howard, JHU, Houston September 2014: UMD, UMASS, Pitt http://www.cirtl.net/LocalEvaluationMaterials

5. 2014 Institutional Portraits

6. Institutional Leaders and their teams are asked to complete the Institutional Portrait for 2013-14 by June 30, 2014. This annual compilation of campus information aids in creating an overall picture of the CIRTL Network and will allow all of us to monitor progress across the network and learn from each other. We hope that in the future, much of this information will be collected throughout the year via the CIRTL Network Commons (IT system).

7. 2014 Institutional Portrait Content Areas 1.Numbers of Associates, Practitioners & Scholars 2.Select details on all CIRTL programs 3.Additional details on 2-5 programs Description, outcomes design, evaluation questions & methods, instruments, evaluation highlights. 4.Local Benefits to students and institution 5.Products (for NSF annual report) – (publications, presentations, websites, chapters, videos, online modules, etc)

8. Key Questions

9. In the fields below, specify how many program participants as of June 2014 have fully met the learning outcomes for each of three CIRTL outcome levels? For this year, please only include data that you consider to be fairly accurate, otherwise leave the cells blank. We expect that this year it may be difficult to provide accurate numbers for participants who have achieved the Associate level.

10. Please provide the details requested for local programs that have been created or revised to reflect the CIRTL Learning Outcomes and incorporate at least 3 of the CIRTL Learning Outcomes. For example, you may have created a brand new program targeting the CIRTL Learning Outcomes or you may have expanded an existing program that is aligned with CIRTL to focus on STEM students. You will also be asked to answer additional evaluation-related questions concerning at least 2 of the programs identified here. You will have the opportunity to provide evaluation information for up to 5 programs.

11. Program Details Program names entered here, will appear throughout the form

12. Program Details Column 1: Identify the Program Type (1-6) - Please enter a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 to indicate which of the program types listed below is closely aligned with your program. 1. Workshop /workshop series 2. Course 3. Seminar (cohort-based offering) 4. TAR internship or experience 5. Learning community 6. Other Column 2: Indicate the number of times the program was offered during the reporting period, Summer 2013 through Spring 2014. (e.g. 6 workshops in a series = 6, A course offered in the fall and spring = 2) Column 3: Total number of participants across all offerings. This may include counting the same person multiple times if he or she attended multiple workshops in a series. Column 4: Number of contact hours per offering (e.g a 1-hour workshop offered 8 times = 8 contact hours) Column 5: Was this a new program, a repeat of a 2012-13 program designed for CIRTL, or a program that pre-dated CIRTL and was revised to become a CIRTL program? Please enter "New," "Repeat," or "Revised. "

13. Program Details Program names entered here, will appear throughout the form

14. In the fields below, please provide a brief program description (about three sentences). As appropriate, you may be able to copy and paste from from your 2013 IP, your original local learning community plan, or your recently shared evaluation materials. Example: In this 10-week course College Classroom course students make observations of a class, draft a teaching statement and write and present a lesson plan as a microteaching experience. We pay particular attention to peer instruction with clickers so the participants become familiar with the research behind it, how to implement it and how to write conceptually challenging questions. We model how to teach at the same time as covering the content. Program Description

15. Program Description with pre-populated program titles Program names entered at the start, appear as prompts through out the form.

16. CIRTL Learning Outcomes For each program, indicate whether the program is designed for most participants to achieve the specific learning outcome.

17. Outcomes check-off Pre-populated program names

18. Evaluation Questions Please indicate the programs for which you will provide responses on the following topics (at least 2 programs). [The questions will follow on the next page] 1) Overarching evaluation questions 2) Description of the evaluation methods and instruments 3) Outcomes of the evaluation process 4) Modification of future offerings based on the evaluation findings

19. Evaluation Questions 1.Specify the overarching question(s) that you are seeking to answer in the evaluation of Program X. 2.In 200 words or less, describe the method and instruments you have used to answer the evaluation question (s). 3.Attach the instrument you have used for evaluating this program. (1) 4.What have you learned from your evaluation of this program? (approximately 200 words or less) 5. Based on your evaluation results, will you do anything differently in the next time? If so, what? 6.On the basis of this evaluation and your experience, what practical recommendations do you have for those who want to offer a similar program?

20. Institutional Portrait Process 1.An email with campus-specific link will be sent to the Institutional Leader (only) 2.The link may be shared with other local team members. 3.You will be able to fill in content over time. Content is saved each time you move to a new page. If a page is partially complete, move to the next page before exiting. You will be able to move back through the form. 4.Once you submit the form, you will not be able to make further edits. Kitch can re-activated your form if needed. 5.A copy of the submission will automatically be sent to the email address provided on the form. 6.After processing, the data submitted will be posted at http://www.cirtl.net/2014IP

21. 2014-15 Scope of Work Subcontract Period: August 1, 2014-July 31, 2015 Scope of work due: June 30, 2014 Submissions via a Qualtrics Form (will be emailed) Revised budgets and budget justifications will be required if they have changed since the original May 2013 proposal (likely)

22. Category 1 Proposals Due May 19 Proposal form at http://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/CNLCproposal http://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/CNLCproposal Linked from the Network Group page: http://www.cirtl.net/networkgrouphttp://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup and from the Cross Network page: http://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/LClinkshttp://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/LClinks

23. Reminder: New accounting period for in-kind contributions to the CIRTL Network Current, accounting period is January 2014 – August 31, 2015 (starting Sept 2015 accounting period will be Sept-August) During current 20-month period, each CIRTL member institution provides two Category 1 and four Category 2 contributions to the Network For more information: http://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/LClinks http://www.cirtl.net/networkgroup/LClinks

24. Summer 2014 CIRTL Courses 1.Planning Your Career: Developing Your Academic E- Portfolio (33) Ra’sheedah Richardson and Cindy Raisor 2.Basics of Online Learning and Teaching (20) Don Gillian-Daniel and Jeff Engler 3.Effective Peer Instruction with Clickers (Mini course) (20) Peter Newbury and Beth Simon Total Number of Students Enrolled: 73 Total Number of Institutions Represented: 20 Non-CIRTL Network Institutions: 6 There is still space in the Clickers mini-course We’ve extended registration for that course until Sunday May 11

25. CIRTL Core Course Instruction Opportunities (very tentative) Fall 2014Spring 2015 College Classroom MOOC ISU? co-instructor Diversity in the College Classroom Howard co-instructor Teaching with Technology Research Mentor Training BU? co-instructor TAR Project course ISU?, UW co-instructor ISU? co-instructor Need: Teaching with Technology Instructors (either semester) Co-instructors for almost all