Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

US History 1-12-16 ObjectiveAgenda Marshall Supreme Court Cases AVW: Monopoly Bellwork: Read “Federalist Plan to secede” pg 316 Create a slogan for a Federalist.

Published byMyles Gilmore Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "US History 1-12-16 ObjectiveAgenda Marshall Supreme Court Cases AVW: Monopoly Bellwork: Read “Federalist Plan to secede” pg 316 Create a slogan for a Federalist."— Presentation transcript:

1 US History 1-12-16 ObjectiveAgenda Marshall Supreme Court Cases AVW: Monopoly Bellwork: Read “Federalist Plan to secede” pg 316 Create a slogan for a Federalist protest. Along with a few sentences explain its meaning. http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=55hAMd nCwMU http://www.youtube.c om/watch?v=55hAMd nCwMU State Benchmark: 8 – U4.2.1 Pg. 317 1-6

2 Marbury vs. Madison John Adams (midnight appt’s) Madison did not deliver the appt. (TJ told him not too) Marbury Sued Both parties used the constitution to support claim. JUDICIAL REVIEW: John Marshall said that it will be the SUPREME COURT would determine what is constitutional or not.

3 McCullough vs. Maryland 1819 McCulloughMaryland Trying to open Federal Bank in Maryland 2 nd bank established in the US McCullough Won IMPLIED POWERS!!!! Elastic Clause: Congress can do more then the Constitution authorizes it to do. Tax Federal Bank, if not chartered in Maryland. Argues 10 th Amendment: Reserved power for states Article 1 section 8: List of delegated power to Congress No Specifically stated.

4 Gibbons vs. Ogden GibbonsOgden Fined for operating a steamboat on NY waterway. Gibbons won! Commerce Clause: Federal Government hold precedence over state law Received permission from Robert Livingston to Monopolize NY water ways. Lost: FED Gov controls waterways

Download ppt "US History 1-12-16 ObjectiveAgenda Marshall Supreme Court Cases AVW: Monopoly Bellwork: Read “Federalist Plan to secede” pg 316 Create a slogan for a Federalist."

Similar presentations

Mid-term Review.

Mid-term Review.
Strengthening the Judicial Branch SOL: VUS.5e.  Born in Midland, Virginia 1755.  Veteran of the Revolutionary War.  He endured the harsh winter at.

Strengthening the Judicial Branch SOL: VUS.5e.  Born in Midland, Virginia  Veteran of the Revolutionary War.  He endured the harsh winter at.
Revenge of the Federalists Summarize the expansion of the power of the national government as a result of Supreme Court decisions under Chief Justice.

Revenge of the Federalists Summarize the expansion of the power of the national government as a result of Supreme Court decisions under Chief Justice.
The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.

The Marshall Court Mr. Johnson AP US History.
The Fight Over Power – Part II Federalists vs

The Fight Over Power – Part II Federalists vs
John Marshall, Chief Justice

John Marshall, Chief Justice
Federalism The relationship between the national and state governments.

Federalism The relationship between the national and state governments.
SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.

SUPREME COURT CASES. THE CASE William Marbury, one of Adam’s “midnight appointments” was denied his job as a judge.
Constitutional Impact on Court Cases J. Worley Civics.

Constitutional Impact on Court Cases J. Worley Civics.
Judicial Review Power of the Courts. Judiciary Act of 1789 George Washington George Washington Created the Federal Court System and outlined the powers.

Judicial Review Power of the Courts. Judiciary Act of 1789 George Washington George Washington Created the Federal Court System and outlined the powers.
Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)

Marbury v. Madison (1803) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1824)
The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?

The Supreme Court (The Judicial Branch) What’s the big deal?
JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.

JOHN MARSHALL’S GREATEST HITS Marbury v. Madison1803 Fletcher v. Peck1810 McCulloch v. Maryland1819 Gibbons v. Ogden1824.
Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.

Courts The point of the courts is to provide a place where we can argue about matters relating to the law. The point of lawyers is to help people argue.
Supreme court cases: constitution is the supreme law of the land Analyze court cases that illustrate that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the.

Supreme court cases: constitution is the supreme law of the land Analyze court cases that illustrate that the US Constitution is the supreme law of the.
John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 

John Marshall, Chief Justice  Nominated to Supreme Court by John Adams in1801  Marshall agreed, and upheld Hamilton’s doctrine of “implied powers” 
Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.

Served as an officer with General Washington during the Revolution Attended College of William and Mary and became a practicing attorney. 2 nd cousin of.
Marbury v. Madison 1803 Case Decision Reason Significance

Marbury v. Madison 1803 Case Decision Reason Significance
Chief Justice John Marshall: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Review to 1877.

Chief Justice John Marshall: Landmark Supreme Court Cases Review to 1877.
“I shall…by the establishment of republican principles…sink federalism into an abyss from which there shall be no resurrection.” -Jefferson With their.

“I shall…by the establishment of republican principles…sink federalism into an abyss from which there shall be no resurrection.” -Jefferson With their.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google