Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJulia Lamb Modified over 8 years ago
1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 1 Operations Management Chapter 4 – Forecasting Operations Management, 9e
2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 2 Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to : Understand the three time horizons and which models apply for each use Explain when to use each of the four qualitative models Apply the naive, moving average, exponential smoothing, and trend methods
3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 3 Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to : Compute three measures of forecast accuracy Develop seasonal indexes Conduct a regression and correlation analysis Use a tracking signal
4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 4 Forecasting at Disney World Global portfolio includes parks in Hong Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and Anaheim Revenues are derived from people – how many visitors and how they spend their money Daily management report contains only the forecast and actual attendance at each park
5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 5 Forecasting at Disney World Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly, annual, and 5-year forecasts Forecast used by labor management, maintenance, operations, finance, and park scheduling Forecast used to adjust opening times, rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests admitted
6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 6 Forecasting at Disney World 20% of customers come from outside the USA Economic model includes gross domestic product, cross-exchange rates, arrivals into the USA A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people survey 1 million park guests, employees, and travel professionals each year
7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 7 Forecasting at Disney World Inputs to the forecasting model include airline specials, Federal Reserve policies, Wall Street trends, vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000 school districts around the world Average forecast error for the 5-year forecast is 5% Average forecast error for annual forecasts is between 0% and 3%
8
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 8 What is Forecasting? Process of predicting a future event Underlying basis of all business decisions Production Inventory Personnel Facilities ??
9
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 9 Short-range forecast Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels, job assignments, production levels Medium-range forecast 3 months to 3 years Sales and production planning, budgeting Long-range forecast 3 + years New product planning, facility location, research and development Forecasting Time Horizons
10
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 10 Distinguishing Differences Medium/long range forecasts deal with more comprehensive issues and support management decisions regarding planning and products, plants and processes Short-term forecasting usually employs different methodologies than longer-term forecasting Short-term forecasts tend to be more accurate than longer-term forecasts
11
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 11 Influence of Product Life Cycle Introduction and growth require longer forecasts than maturity and decline As product passes through life cycle, forecasts are useful in projecting Staffing levels Inventory levels Factory capacity Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline
12
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 12 Product Life Cycle Best period to increase market share R&D engineering is critical Practical to change price or quality image Strengthen niche Poor time to change image, price, or quality Competitive costs become critical Defend market position Cost control critical IntroductionGrowthMaturityDecline Company Strategy/Issues Figure 2.5 Internet search engines Sales Xbox 360 Drive-through restaurants CD-ROMs 3 1/2” Floppy disks LCD & plasma TVs Analog TVs iPods
13
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 13 Product Life Cycle Product design and development critical Frequent product and process design changes Short production runs High production costs Limited models Attention to quality IntroductionGrowthMaturityDecline OM Strategy/Issues Forecasting critical Product and process reliability Competitive product improvements and options Increase capacity Shift toward product focus Enhance distribution Standardization Less rapid product changes – more minor changes Optimum capacity Increasing stability of process Long production runs Product improvement and cost cutting Little product differentiation Cost minimization Overcapacity in the industry Prune line to eliminate items not returning good margin Reduce capacity Figure 2.5
14
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 14 Seven Steps in Forecasting Determine the use of the forecast Select the items to be forecasted Determine the time horizon of the forecast Select the forecasting model(s) Gather the data Make the forecast Validate and implement results
15
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 15 The Realities! Forecasts are seldom perfect Most techniques assume an underlying stability in the system Product family and aggregated forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts
16
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 16 Forecasting Approaches Used when situation is vague and little data exist New products New technology Involves intuition, experience e.g., forecasting sales on Internet Qualitative Methods
17
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 17 Forecasting Approaches Used when situation is ‘stable’ and historical data exist Existing products Current technology Involves mathematical techniques e.g., forecasting sales of color televisions Quantitative Methods
18
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 18 Overview of Qualitative Methods Jury of executive opinion Pool opinions of high-level experts, sometimes augment by statistical models Delphi method Panel of experts, queried iteratively
19
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 19 Overview of Qualitative Methods Sales force composite Estimates from individual salespersons are reviewed for reasonableness, then aggregated Consumer Market Survey Ask the customer
20
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 20 Involves small group of high-level experts and managers Group estimates demand by working together Combines managerial experience with statistical models Relatively quick ‘Group-think’ disadvantage Jury of Executive Opinion
21
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 21 Sales Force Composite Each salesperson projects his or her sales Combined at district and national levels Sales reps know customers’ wants Tends to be overly optimistic
22
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 22 Delphi Method Iterative group process, continues until consensus is reached 3 types of participants Decision makers Staff Respondents Staff (Administering survey) Decision Makers (Evaluate responses and make decisions) Respondents (People who can make valuable judgments)
23
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 23 Consumer Market Survey Ask customers about purchasing plans What consumers say, and what they actually do are often different Sometimes difficult to answer
24
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 24 Overview of Quantitative Approaches 1.Naive approach 2.Moving averages 3.Exponential smoothing 4.Trend projection 5.Linear regression Time-Series Models Associative Model
25
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 25 Set of evenly spaced numerical data Obtained by observing response variable at regular time periods Forecast based only on past values, no other variables important Assumes that factors influencing past and present will continue influence in future Time Series Forecasting
26
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 26 Trend Seasonal Cyclical Random Time Series Components
27
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 27 Components of Demand Demand for product or service |||| 1234 Year Average demand over four years Seasonal peaks Trend component Actual demand Random variation Figure 4.1
28
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 28 Persistent, overall upward or downward pattern Changes due to population, technology, age, culture, etc. Typically several years duration Trend Component
29
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 29 Regular pattern of up and down fluctuations Due to weather, customs, etc. Occurs within a single year Seasonal Component Number of PeriodLengthSeasons WeekDay7 MonthWeek4-4.5 MonthDay28-31 YearQuarter4 YearMonth12 YearWeek52
30
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 30 Repeating up and down movements Affected by business cycle, political, and economic factors Multiple years duration Often causal or associative relationships Cyclical Component 05101520
31
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 31 Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’ fluctuations Due to random variation or unforeseen events Short duration and nonrepeating Random Component MTWTFMTWTFMTWTFMTWTF
32
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 32 Naive Approach Assumes demand in next period is the same as demand in most recent period e.g., If January sales were 68, then February sales will be 68 Sometimes cost effective and efficient Can be good starting point
33
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 33 MA is a series of arithmetic means Used if little or no trend Used often for smoothing Provides overall impression of data over time Moving Average Method Moving average = ∑ demand in previous n periods n
34
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 34 January10 February12 March13 April16 May19 June23 July26 Actual3-Month MonthShed SalesMoving Average (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2 / 3 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1 / 3 Moving Average Example 101213 (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2 / 3
35
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 35 Graph of Moving Average ||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Shed Sales 30 30 – 28 28 – 26 26 – 24 24 – 22 22 – 20 20 – 18 18 – 16 16 – 14 14 – 12 12 – 10 10 – Actual Sales Moving Average Forecast
36
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 36 Used when trend is present Older data usually less important Weights based on experience and intuition Weighted Moving Average Weighted moving average = ∑ (weight for period n) x (demand in period n) ∑ weights
37
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 37 January10 February12 March13 April16 May19 June23 July26 Actual3-Month Weighted MonthShed SalesMoving Average [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 14 1 / 3 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 20 1 / 2 Weighted Moving Average 101213 [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 12 1 / 6 Weights AppliedPeriod 3Last month 2Two months ago 1Three months ago 6Sum of weights
38
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 38 Increasing n smooths the forecast but makes it less sensitive to changes Do not forecast trends well Require extensive historical data Potential Problems With Moving Average
39
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 39 Moving Average And Weighted Moving Average 30 30 – 25 25 – 20 20 – 15 15 – 10 10 – 5 5 – Sales demand ||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Actual sales Moving average Weighted moving average Figure 4.2
40
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 40 Form of weighted moving average Weights decline exponentially Most recent data weighted most Requires smoothing constant ( ) Ranges from 0 to 1 Subjectively chosen Involves little record keeping of past data Exponential Smoothing
41
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 41 Exponential Smoothing New forecast =Last period’s forecast + (Last period’s actual demand – Last period’s forecast) F t = F t – 1 + (A t – 1 - F t – 1 ) whereF t =new forecast F t – 1 =previous forecast =smoothing (or weighting) constant (0 ≤ ≤ 1)
42
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 42 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant =.20
43
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 43 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant =.20 New forecast= 142 +.2(153 – 142)
44
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 44 Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant =.20 New forecast= 142 +.2(153 – 142) = 142 + 2.2 = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars
45
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 45 Effect of Smoothing Constants Weight Assigned to Most2nd Most3rd Most4th Most5th Most RecentRecentRecentRecentRecent SmoothingPeriodPeriodPeriodPeriodPeriod Constant( ) (1 - ) (1 - ) 2 (1 - ) 3 (1 - ) 4 =.1.1.09.081.073.066 =.5.5.25.125.063.031
46
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 46 Impact of Different 225 225 – 200 200 – 175 175 – 150 150 – |||||||||123456789123456789|||||||||123456789123456789 Quarter Demand =.1 Actual demand =.5
47
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 47 Impact of Different 225 225 – 200 200 – 175 175 – 150 150 – |||||||||123456789123456789|||||||||123456789123456789 Quarter Demand =.1 Actual demand =.5 Chose high values of when underlying average is likely to change Choose low values of when underlying average is stable
48
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 48 Choosing The objective is to obtain the most accurate forecast no matter the technique We generally do this by selecting the model that gives us the lowest forecast error Forecast error= Actual demand - Forecast value = A t - F t
49
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 49 Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) MAD = ∑ |Actual - Forecast| n Mean Squared Error (MSE) MSE = ∑ (Forecast Errors) 2 n
50
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 50 Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) MAPE = ∑ 100|Actual i - Forecast i |/Actual i n n i = 1
51
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 51 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded =.10 =.10 =.50 =.50 11801755.001755.00 2168175.57.50177.509.50 3159174.7515.75172.7513.75 4175173.181.82165.889.12 5190173.3616.64170.4419.56 6205175.0229.98180.2224.78 7180178.021.98192.6112.61 8182178.223.78186.304.30 82.4598.62
52
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 52 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded =.10 =.10 =.50 =.50 11801755.001755.00 2168175.57.50177.509.50 3159174.7515.75172.7513.75 4175173.181.82165.889.12 5190173.3616.64170.4419.56 6205175.0229.98180.2224.78 7180178.021.98192.6112.61 8182178.223.78186.304.30 82.4598.62 MAD = ∑ |deviations| n = 82.45/8 = 10.31 For =.10 = 98.62/8 = 12.33 For =.50
53
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 53 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded =.10 =.10 =.50 =.50 11801755.001755.00 2168175.57.50177.509.50 3159174.7515.75172.7513.75 4175173.181.82165.889.12 5190173.3616.64170.4419.56 6205175.0229.98180.2224.78 7180178.021.98192.6112.61 8182178.223.78186.304.30 82.4598.62 MAD10.3112.33 = 1,526.54/8 = 190.82 For =.10 = 1,561.91/8 = 195.24 For =.50 MSE = ∑ (forecast errors) 2 n
54
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 54 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded =.10 =.10 =.50 =.50 11801755.001755.00 2168175.57.50177.509.50 3159174.7515.75172.7513.75 4175173.181.82165.889.12 5190173.3616.64170.4419.56 6205175.0229.98180.2224.78 7180178.021.98192.6112.61 8182178.223.78186.304.30 82.4598.62 MAD10.3112.33 MSE190.82195.24 = 44.75/8 = 5.59% For =.10 = 54.05/8 = 6.76% For =.50 MAPE = ∑ 100|deviation i |/actual i n i = 1
55
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 55 Comparison of Forecast Error RoundedAbsoluteRoundedAbsolute ActualForecastDeviationForecastDeviation Tonnagewithforwithfor QuarterUnloaded =.10 =.10 =.50 =.50 11801755.001755.00 2168175.57.50177.509.50 3159174.7515.75172.7513.75 4175173.181.82165.889.12 5190173.3616.64170.4419.56 6205175.0229.98180.2224.78 7180178.021.98192.6112.61 8182178.223.78186.304.30 82.4598.62 MAD10.3112.33 MSE190.82195.24 MAPE5.59%6.76%
56
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 56 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment When a trend is present, exponential smoothing must be modified Forecast including (FIT t ) = trend ExponentiallyExponentially smoothed (F t ) +(T t )smoothed forecasttrend
57
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 57 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment F t = (A t - 1 ) + (1 - )(F t - 1 + T t - 1 ) T t = (F t - F t - 1 ) + (1 - )T t - 1 Step 1: Compute F t Step 2: Compute T t Step 3: Calculate the forecast FIT t = F t + T t
58
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 58 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast ActualSmoothedSmoothedIncluding Month(t)Demand (A t )Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t 11211213.00 217 320 419 524 621 731 828 936 10 Table 4.1
59
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 59 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast ActualSmoothedSmoothedIncluding Month(t)Demand (A t )Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t 11211213.00 217 320 419 524 621 731 828 936 10 Table 4.1 F 2 = A 1 + (1 - )(F 1 + T 1 ) F 2 = (.2)(12) + (1 -.2)(11 + 2) = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units Step 1: Forecast for Month 2
60
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 60 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast ActualSmoothedSmoothedIncluding Month(t)Demand (A t )Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t 11211213.00 21712.80 320 419 524 621 731 828 936 10 Table 4.1 T 2 = (F 2 - F 1 ) + (1 - )T 1 T 2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 -.4)(2) =.72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units Step 2: Trend for Month 2
61
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 61 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast ActualSmoothedSmoothedIncluding Month(t)Demand (A t )Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t 11211213.00 21712.801.92 320 419 524 621 731 828 936 10 Table 4.1 FIT 2 = F 2 + T 2 FIT 2 = 12.8 + 1.92 = 14.72 units Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2
62
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 62 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast ActualSmoothedSmoothedIncluding Month(t)Demand (A t )Forecast, F t Trend, T t Trend, FIT t 11211213.00 21712.801.9214.72 320 419 524 621 731 828 936 10 Table 4.1 15.182.1017.28 17.822.3220.14 19.912.2322.14 22.512.3824.89 24.112.0726.18 27.142.4529.59 29.282.3231.60 32.482.6835.16
63
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 63 Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Figure 4.3 |||||||||123456789123456789|||||||||123456789123456789 Time (month) Product demand 35 35 – 30 30 – 25 25 – 20 20 – 15 15 – 10 10 – 5 5 – 0 0 – Actual demand (A t ) Forecast including trend (FIT t ) with =.2 and =.4
64
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 64 Trend Projections Fitting a trend line to historical data points to project into the medium to long-range Linear trends can be found using the least squares technique y = a + bx ^ where y= computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a= y-axis intercept b= slope of the regression line x= the independent variable ^
65
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 65 Least Squares Method Time period Values of Dependent Variable Figure 4.4 Deviation 1 (error) Deviation 5 Deviation 7 Deviation 2 Deviation 6 Deviation 4 Deviation 3 Actual observation (y value) Trend line, y = a + bx ^
66
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 66 Least Squares Method Time period Values of Dependent Variable Figure 4.4 Deviation 1 Deviation 5 Deviation 7 Deviation 2 Deviation 6 Deviation 4 Deviation 3 Actual observation (y value) Trend line, y = a + bx ^ Least squares method minimizes the sum of the squared errors (deviations)
67
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 67 Least Squares Method Equations to calculate the regression variables b = xy - nxy x 2 - nx 2 y = a + bx ^ a = y - bx
68
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 68 Least Squares Example b = = = 10.54 ∑xy - nxy ∑x 2 - nx 2 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) 140 - (7)(4 2 ) a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 TimeElectrical Power YearPeriod (x)Demandx 2 xy 2001174174 20022794158 20033809240 200449016360 2005510525525 2005614236852 2007712249854 ∑x = 28∑y = 692∑x 2 = 140∑xy = 3,063 x = 4y = 98.86
69
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 69 Least Squares Example b = = = 10.54 xy - nxy x 2 - nx 2 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) 140 - (7)(4 2 ) a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 TimeElectrical Power YearPeriod (x)Demandx 2 xy 1999174174 20002794158 20013809240 200249016360 2003510525525 2004614236852 2005712249854 x = 28 y = 692 x 2 = 140 xy = 3,063 x = 4y = 98.86 The trend line is y = 56.70 + 10.54x ^
70
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 70 Least Squares Example ||||||||| 200120022003200420052006200720082009 160 160 – 150 150 – 140 140 – 130 130 – 120 120 – 110 110 – 100 100 – 90 90 – 80 80 – 70 70 – 60 60 – 50 50 – Year Power demand Trend line, y = 56.70 + 10.54x ^
71
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 71 Least Squares Requirements 1.We always plot the data to insure a linear relationship 2.We do not predict time periods far beyond the database 3.Deviations around the least squares line are assumed to be random
72
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 72 Seasonal Variations In Data The multiplicative seasonal model can adjust trend data for seasonal variations in demand
73
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 73 Seasonal Variations In Data 1.Find average historical demand for each season 2.Compute the average demand over all seasons 3.Compute a seasonal index for each season 4.Estimate next year’s total demand 5.Divide this estimate of total demand by the number of seasons, then multiply it by the seasonal index for that season Steps in the process:
74
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 74 Seasonal Index Example Jan80851059094 Feb7085858094 Mar8093828594 Apr909511510094 May11312513112394 Jun11011512011594 Jul10010211310594 Aug8810211010094 Sept8590959094 Oct7778858094 Nov7572838094 Dec8278808094 DemandAverageAverage Seasonal Month2005200620072005-2007MonthlyIndex
75
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 75 Seasonal Index Example Jan80851059094 Feb7085858094 Mar8093828594 Apr909511510094 May11312513112394 Jun11011512011594 Jul10010211310594 Aug8810211010094 Sept8590959094 Oct7778858094 Nov7572838094 Dec8278808094 DemandAverageAverage Seasonal Month2005200620072005-2007MonthlyIndex 0.957 Seasonal index = average 2005-2007 monthly demand average monthly demand = 90/94 =.957
76
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 76 Seasonal Index Example Jan808510590940.957 Feb70858580940.851 Mar80938285940.904 Apr9095115100941.064 May113125131123941.309 Jun110115120115941.223 Jul100102113105941.117 Aug88102110100941.064 Sept85909590940.957 Oct77788580940.851 Nov75728380940.851 Dec82788080940.851 DemandAverageAverage Seasonal Month2005200620072005-2007MonthlyIndex
77
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 77 Seasonal Index Example Jan808510590940.957 Feb70858580940.851 Mar80938285940.904 Apr9095115100941.064 May113125131123941.309 Jun110115120115941.223 Jul100102113105941.117 Aug88102110100941.064 Sept85909590940.957 Oct77788580940.851 Nov75728380940.851 Dec82788080940.851 DemandAverageAverage Seasonal Month2005200620072005-2007MonthlyIndex Expected annual demand = 1,200 Janx.957 = 96 1,200 12 Febx.851 = 85 1,200 12 Forecast for 2008
78
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 78 Seasonal Index Example 140 140 – 130 130 – 120 120 – 110 110 – 100 100 – 90 90 – 80 80 – 70 70 – ||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND||||||||||||JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASOND Time Demand 2008 Forecast 2007 Demand 2006 Demand 2005 Demand
79
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 79 San Diego Hospital 10,200 10,200 – 10,000 10,000 – 9,800 9,800 – 9,600 9,600 – 9,400 9,400 – 9,200 9,200 – 9,000 9,000 – |||||||||||| JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec 676869707172737475767778 Month Inpatient Days 9530 9551 9573 9594 9616 9637 9659 9680 9702 972497459766 Figure 4.6 Trend Data
80
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 80 San Diego Hospital 1.06 1.06 – 1.04 1.04 – 1.02 1.02 – 1.00 1.00 – 0.98 0.98 – 0.96 0.96 – 0.94 0.94 – 0.92 – |||||||||||| JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec 676869707172737475767778 Month Index for Inpatient Days 1.04 1.02 1.01 0.99 1.031.041.00 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.96 Figure 4.7 Seasonal Indices
81
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 81 San Diego Hospital 10,200 10,200 – 10,000 10,000 – 9,800 9,800 – 9,600 9,600 – 9,400 9,400 – 9,200 9,200 – 9,000 9,000 – |||||||||||| JanFebMarAprMayJuneJulyAugSeptOctNovDec 676869707172737475767778 Month Inpatient Days Figure 4.8 9911 9265 9764 9520 9691 9411 9949 9724 9542 9355100689572 Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast
82
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 82 Associative Forecasting Used when changes in one or more independent variables can be used to predict the changes in the dependent variable Most common technique is linear regression analysis We apply this technique just as we did in the time series example
83
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 83 Associative Forecasting Forecasting an outcome based on predictor variables using the least squares technique y = a + bx ^ where y= computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a= y-axis intercept b= slope of the regression line x= the independent variable though to predict the value of the dependent variable ^
84
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 84 Associative Forecasting Example SalesLocal Payroll ($ millions), y($ billions), x 2.01 3.03 2.54 2.02 2.01 3.57 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll
85
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 85 Associative Forecasting Example Sales, y Payroll, xx 2 xy 2.0112.0 3.0399.0 2.541610.0 2.0244.0 2.0112.0 3.574924.5 ∑y = 15.0∑x = 18∑x 2 = 80∑xy = 51.5 x = ∑x/6 = 18/6 = 3 y = ∑y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5 b = = =.25 ∑xy - nxy ∑x 2 - nx 2 51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5) 80 - (6)(3 2 ) a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75
86
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 86 Associative Forecasting Example 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll y = 1.75 +.25x ^ Sales = 1.75 +.25(payroll) If payroll next year is estimated to be $6 billion, then: Sales = 1.75 +.25(6) Sales = $3,250,000 3.25
87
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 87 Standard Error of the Estimate A forecast is just a point estimate of a future value This point is actually the mean of a probability distribution Figure 4.9 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll 3.25
88
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 88 Standard Error of the Estimate wherey=y-value of each data point y c =computed value of the dependent variable, from the regression equation n=number of data points S y,x = ∑(y - y c ) 2 n - 2
89
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 89 Standard Error of the Estimate Computationally, this equation is considerably easier to use We use the standard error to set up prediction intervals around the point estimate S y,x = ∑y 2 - a∑y - b∑xy n - 2
90
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 90 Standard Error of the Estimate 4.0 – 3.0 – 2.0 – 1.0 – |||||||01234567|||||||01234567 Sales Area payroll 3.25 S y,x = = ∑y 2 - a∑y - b∑xy n - 2 39.5 - 1.75(15) -.25(51.5) 6 - 2 S y,x =.306 The standard error of the estimate is $306,000 in sales
91
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 91 How strong is the linear relationship between the variables? Correlation does not necessarily imply causality! Coefficient of correlation, r, measures degree of association Values range from -1 to +1 Correlation
92
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 92 Correlation Coefficient r = n xy - x y [n x 2 - ( x) 2 ][n y 2 - ( y) 2 ]
93
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 93 Correlation Coefficient r = n xy - x y [n x 2 - ( x) 2 ][n y 2 - ( y) 2 ] y x (a)Perfect positive correlation: r = +1 y x (b)Positive correlation: 0 < r < 1 y x (c)No correlation: r = 0 y x (d)Perfect negative correlation: r = -1
94
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 94 Coefficient of Determination, r 2, measures the percent of change in y predicted by the change in x Values range from 0 to 1 Easy to interpret Correlation For the Nodel Construction example: r =.901 r 2 =.81
95
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 95 Multiple Regression Analysis If more than one independent variable is to be used in the model, linear regression can be extended to multiple regression to accommodate several independent variables y = a + b 1 x 1 + b 2 x 2 … ^ Computationally, this is quite complex and generally done on the computer
96
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 96 Multiple Regression Analysis y = 1.80 +.30x 1 - 5.0x 2 ^ In the Nodel example, including interest rates in the model gives the new equation: An improved correlation coefficient of r =.96 means this model does a better job of predicting the change in construction sales Sales = 1.80 +.30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00 Sales = $3,000,000
97
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 97 Measures how well the forecast is predicting actual values Ratio of running sum of forecast errors (RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD) Good tracking signal has low values If forecasts are continually high or low, the forecast has a bias error Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking Signal
98
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 98 Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking signal RSFEMAD= = ∑(Actual demand in period i - Forecast demand in period i) ∑|Actual - Forecast|/n)
99
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 99 Tracking Signal Tracking signal + 0 MADs – Upper control limit Lower control limit Time Signal exceeding limit Acceptable range
100
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 100 Tracking Signal Example Cumulative AbsoluteAbsolute ActualForecastForecastForecast QtrDemandDemandErrorRSFEErrorErrorMAD 190100-10-10101010.0 295100-5-155157.5 3115100+150153010.0 4100110-10-10104010.0 5125110+15+5155511.0 6140110+30+35308514.2
101
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 101Cumulative AbsoluteAbsolute ActualForecastForecastForecast QtrDemandDemandErrorRSFEErrorErrorMAD 190100-10-10101010.0 295100-5-155157.5 3115100+150153010.0 4100110-10-10104010.0 5125110+15+5155511.0 6140110+30+35308514.2 Tracking Signal Example Tracking Signal (RSFE/MAD) -10/10 = -1 -15/7.5 = -2 0/10 = 0 -10/10 = -1 +5/11 = +0.5 +35/14.2 = +2.5 The variation of the tracking signal between -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptable limits
102
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 102 Forecasting in the Service Sector Presents unusual challenges Special need for short term records Needs differ greatly as function of industry and product Holidays and other calendar events Unusual events
103
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 103 Fast Food Restaurant Forecast 20% 20% – 15% 15% – 10% 10% – 5% 5% – 11-121-23-45-67-89-10 12-12-34-56-78-910-11 (Lunchtime)(Dinnertime) Hour of day Percentage of sales Figure 4.12
104
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.4 – 104 FedEx Call Center Forecast Figure 4.12 12% 12% – 10% 10% – 8% 8% – 6% 6% – 4% 4% – 2% 2% – 0% 0% – Hour of day A.M.P.M. 2468101224681012
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.