Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMervin McDaniel Modified over 8 years ago
1
Inventories Revsine/Collins/Johnson/Mittelstaedt: Chapter 9 Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin
2
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 2 Learning objectives 1.The two methods used to determine inventory quantities— perpetual and periodic. 2.What kinds of costs are included in inventory. 3.What absorption costing is and how it complicates financial analysis. 4.The difference between inventory cost flow assumptions— weighted average, FIFO and LIFO. 5.How LIFO reserve disclosures can be used to estimate inventory holding gains and to transform LIFO firms to a FIFO basis.
3
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 3 Learning objectives concluded 6.How LIFO liquidations distort gross profit. 7.What research tells us about why some firms use LIFO and others don’t. 8.How to eliminate realized holding gains from FIFO income. 9.How and when to use the lower of cost or market method. 10.How and why the dollar-value LIFO method is applied.
4
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 4 Overview of accounting issues What kind of costs are included in inventory? How is the cost of goods available for sale split between the balance sheet and the income statement? Old unitNew unit Issue:
5
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 5 Overview of accounting issues: Allocating the cost of goods available for sale Weighted average approach: Uses the average cost of the two units. Oldest unit cost flows to income. First-in, first-out (FIFO) approach: Uses the average cost of the two units. FIFO produces a smaller expense Newest unit cost flows to income. Last-in, last-out (LIFO) approach: LIFO produces a larger expense Oldest unit cost flows to income.
6
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 6 Determining inventory quantities: Perpetual inventory system This approach keeps a running (or “perpetual”) record of the amount of inventory on hand. The inventory T-account under a perpetual inventory system looks like this: Entries are made as units are purchased Entries are made as units are sold
7
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 7 Determining inventory quantities: Periodic inventory system This approach does not keep a running (or “perpetual”) record of the amount of inventory on hand. Ending inventory and cost of goods sold must be determined by physically counting the goods on hand at the end of the period. Entries are made as units are purchased
8
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 8 Items included in inventory In day-to-day operations, most firms record inventory when they physically receive it. However, when it comes to preparing financial statements, the firm must determine whether all inventory items are legally owned. Goods in transit may be “owned” by the buyer or the seller. The party that has legal title during transit will record the items as inventory. Consignment goods should not be counted as inventory for the consignee. ConsignorConsigneeCustomer consigned goods Sale Owner Agent
9
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 9 Costs included in inventory All costs required to obtain physical possession of the inventory and to make it saleable. Purchase cost Sales taxes and transportation paid by the buyer Insurance costs Storage costs Production costs (labor and overhead) for a manufacturer In theory, inventory costs should also include the (indirect) costs of the purchasing department and other general and administrative costs associated with the acquisition and distribution of inventory. However, most firms exclude these items and limit inventory costs to direct acquisition and processing costs.
10
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 10 Cost flow assumptions: First-in, First-out (FIFO) illustrated The computations are:
11
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 11 Cost flow assumptions: Last-in, First-out (LIFO) illustrated The computations are:
12
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 12 Cost flow assumptions: Inventory holding gains summary Holding gain flows to income Holding gain still on balance sheet
13
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 13 When a LIFO firm liquidates old LIFO layers, the net income number under LIFO can be seriously distorted. Old LIFO layers that are liquidated are “matched” against sales dollars that are stated at higher current prices. LIFO liquidation 10 units at $300 each 20 units at $400 each 30 units at $500 each 45 units at $600 each 5 units at $400 each 30 units at $500 each 45 units at $600 each Current purchases 3 rd layer 2 rd layer 1 st layer Goods available LIFO cost of goods sold 80 units were sold How old LIFO cost distorts COGS
14
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 14 Inventory errors Due to a miscount in 2008, ending inventory is overstated by $1 million. Here’s the effect: If not detected and corrected, here’s how the 2008 error will affect 2009 results:
15
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 15 Summary Absorption costing can lead to potentially misleading trend comparisons. GAAP allows firms latitude in selecting a cost flow assumption. Some firms use FIFO, others use LIFO, and still others use weighted-average. This diversity can hinder comparisons across firms, thus its often useful to convert LIFO firms to a FIFO basis. Reported FIFO income includes potentially unsustainable realized holding gains.
16
RCJM: Chapter 9 © 2009 16 Summary concluded Similarly, LIFO liquidations produce potentially unsustainable realized holding gains. Old, out-of-date LIFO layers can distort various ratio comparisons. Users must understand these inventory accounting differences and know how to adjust for them. Only then can valid comparisons be made across firms and over time.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.