Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Daniel Wermeling, Pharm.D. Professor 225 COP.  Nociception - the detection of tissue injury by peripheral nerve fibers  Pain – an unpleasant sensory.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Daniel Wermeling, Pharm.D. Professor 225 COP.  Nociception - the detection of tissue injury by peripheral nerve fibers  Pain – an unpleasant sensory."— Presentation transcript:

1 Daniel Wermeling, Pharm.D. Professor 225 COP

2  Nociception - the detection of tissue injury by peripheral nerve fibers  Pain – an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage  Pain requires recognition by higher centers in the brain

3  Transduction/Stimulation  Activation of nociceptors from noxious stimulation such as heat, chemicals, trauma  Causes release of activators such as prostaglandins, Substance P, bradykinins, histamine and leukotrienes  Also possible activation of sympathetic nervous system (fight or flight), some pain nerve fibers pass through sympathetic ganglia

4 Transduction Prostaglandin Tissue Injury Overall effect is increased nociceptor activation Histamine NGF Bradykinin 5-HT ATP H+ Mediators Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Substance P Histamine Bradykinin Serotonin Hydroxyacids Reactive oxygen species Substance P Kelly D, et al. Can J Clin Anaesth. 2001;48:1000-1010. Pain: Current Understanding of Assessment, Management, and Treatments. Monograph developed by NPC and JCAHO, December 2001.

5  Takes place on A-delta and C afferent nerve fibers  A-delta produce sharp localized pain sensations and are “fast”  C fibers produce dull, aching, poorly localized pain and are “slower”  Comprise the “first” pain from A (sharp) and “second” pain sensation from C fibers (dull, throbbing)  Example – hit thumb with a hammer

6 Reticular Formation Rostroventral Medulla Descending Pathway Spinal Cord Ascending Pathway Dorsal Horn Primary Nociceptive Fiber (A-  or C fiber) Inhibitory Transmitters GABA Glycine Somatostatin Descending Inhibitor Pathways Excitatory Transmitters Substance P Calcitonin gene  related peptide Aspartate, glutamate Kelly D, et al. Can J Clin Anaesth. 2001;48:1000-1010. Pain: Current Understanding of Assessment, Management, and Treatments. Monograph developed by NPC and JCAHO, December 2001.

7  Nerve fibers enter dorsal horn of spinal cord  Message is transmitted via various tracts to higher centers in brain  Pain is then perceived consciously  Higher centers can influence or modify the pain experience  Anxiety, fear, relaxation, depression, rest, mood elevation, diversion & fatigue all influence the experience of pain  Rationale for Rx & non-pharmacologic treatments

8

9

10  Central endogenous systems provide feedback to the spinal and afferent systems  Endogenous opiates - enkephalin, endorphins  Sympathetic system- norepinephrine, epinephrine  Other central inhibitory neurotransmitters  acetylcholine, serotinin, norepinephrine, neurokinins, etc.  Gate Control Theory of Pain Modulation  Non-nociceptive sensations such as heat, cold, vibration, touch, in same dermatome as the painful stimulus, reduces the sensation of pain. Spinal gate is closed by new signals

11  Pain from damage to afferent nociceptive nerve fibers, not activation of peripheral receptors from stimuli  Syndrome results from continuous abnormal processing of sensory input and subsequent physiologic (plasticity) changes within the nervous system  Modulation and transmission functions become dysfunctional

12  Some nerves degenerate and the lesions trigger  Expression of Na+ channels on damaged C-fibers  Expression of Na+, α -adrenoceptor on uninjured fibers  Promotes hyperexcitation and spontaneous nerve firing

13 Ca 2+ Glutamate C-Fiber Central Axon AMPA NMDA Substance P NK-I Na + K+K+ Ca2 + Mg2 + Plug Removed c-fos expression NO Synthase NO PKC Dorsal Horn Cell GABA B μ δ α2α2 5-HT 3 Baclofen Opioids Clonidine GABAA 5-HT1B K+K+ Guanyl Synthase Closed K + Channel Basbaum A. PNAS. 1999;96:7739-7743.

14  Burning (like foot on a hot plate)  Tingling  Electrical shock, shooting and muscle spasms  Hyperalgesia – exaggerated painful perception to normally noxious stimulus (like a pin-prick)  Allodynia - Painful response to a non-noxious stimulus (rubbed by a feather)  Closest example of “hitting your funny bone”

15

16  Endocrine/metabolic  Metabolic disturbances related to altered release of hormones, glucose intolerance, hypercortisolism  Cardiovascular  CV responses can cause unstable angina, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis  Respiratory  May lead to atelectasis or pneumonia

17  Gastrointestinal  May reduce gastric emptying and motility  Musculoskeletal  Impaired mobility and function  Immune system  Increased susceptibility to infection  Genitourinary system  May disturb urine output, fluid volume, and electrolyte balance  Nervous System - Untreated or under treated acute pain can lead to chronic pain condition

18  Psychological effects of unrelieved pain  Feelings of anger, resentment, fear, anxiety, depression  Patients may consider or attempt suicide  Loss of enjoyment of life, feelings of social isolation  Conflicts in interpersonal relationships

19  Impact on patients’ ability to function  Need assistance in daily living activities  Cannot participate in usual leisure or social activities  Difficulty in achieving restful sleep, which diminishes concentration and cognitive abilities and causes irritation

20  Impact on patients’ ability to function  Many cannot work  25% quit job  20% take disability leave  17% had to change jobs

21  In hospitals/clinics pain considered fifth “vital sign” to encourage regular assessment  JCAHO standards in hospitals  Must have routine SOPs for assessment and treatment  Consider the setting – out- vs in- patient, surgery, acute on top of chronic pain, etc.

22  Patients’ right to pain management  Report will be believed  Response will be quick  Pain will be assessed and reassessed as needed  Patients will be educated about pain management  In the appropriate context  Inpatient  Ambulatory  Acute vs Chronic

23  Patient considerations:  Onset, duration, location, quality, severity, intensity of pain  What alleviates or exacerbates the pain  How current treatment is working  Adverse effects of current treatment  Impact on function, behavior, mental status

24  P = Palliative factors – what makes pain better? & Provocative factors – what makes it worse?  Q = Quality – Describe the pain in own words  R = Radiation – Were is the pain?  S = Severity/Intensity – How does the pain compare with other pain you have experienced  T = Temporal – Does the intensity change with time?

25

26

27  History and Physical  Diagnostic Testing  Pain Specific Assessments  Patient Goals and Expectations  Create a Care Plan  Assess Patient and Environment Barriers  Presence/Absence of Aberrant Behavior

28 Age Body Habitus Other Diseases Organ Dysfxn Other Meds Cost and Insurance Evidence- based Guidelines Compliance Uncert- ainty Factors Life is like a box of chocolates – You never know what you are going to get – Forrest Gump, Philosopher Spin Here

29  Categorical scales  Patients select from list of words or pictures showing pain  Especially helpful for use with children and cognitively impaired individuals  Multidimensional tools for Chronic Pain  Validated tools include questions about various aspects of pain and its effect on the patient’s life  More complex, time-consuming

30  Disability index  Developed to assess pain’s effect on functioning  Walking, lifting, standing, sleeping, social, activities of daily living

31  Psychological evaluation  Particularly in chronic pain  Up to 50% of chronic pain patients suffer from depression  Depression commonly undertreated or patients are non-compliant  Depression in pain patients is highly correlated with drug misuse, overdoses, and deaths

32  Comorbidities should be considered  Renal and hepatic function: Can affect medication selection and dosing  Bowel function abnormalities  Other medications used by the patient  Affects selection of pain medication

33  Home environment, social network, access to pharmacy, rehab services  Patient barriers – culture, co-morbid conditions, fears  Non-compliance  Too complicated a regimen  Adverse effects  Mental health problems-depression, drug abuse

34  Identify a level that is acceptable to the patient so that they can deal with pain or have normal Activities of Daily Living (ADL)  Identify a level on the rating scale that requires re-evaluation by a professional  Conduct assessment of individuals with unacceptable pain ratings

35  Prior Rx drug abuse and recreational drug use  Question to determine if behavior is  Addiction (see definition)  Brief experimentation  Trying to find effective pain relief (undertreated)  Addiction is rare in patients without prior abuse history  Inquire about legal problems in past related to drugs  Family history of drug or ethanol abuse – lose control of drug product

36  State concern with patient early in treatment  See patient more frequently  Physical exams to detect indications of drug abuse  Track marks, inflamed nasal mucosa, tremor, tachycardia, etc.  Prescribe small quantities of medication more frequently  Urine toxicology screening

37  See only one physician  Go to only one pharmacy  No early, night, or weekend refills  No unauthorized dose escalation  No giving medications to others

38  Patient reports of pain and relief are to be considered valid  Listen to the patient and maintain dialogue with the family  Refer to Pain Management Specialists if unable to satisfy patient needs


Download ppt "Daniel Wermeling, Pharm.D. Professor 225 COP.  Nociception - the detection of tissue injury by peripheral nerve fibers  Pain – an unpleasant sensory."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google