Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDale Pierce Modified over 8 years ago
1
MODULATABLE (STIMULATION) FUNCTION SECONDARY DAMAGE SUPPORT ACTIVATION OF COMPENSATORY MECHANISMS* ● Adrenergic ● RAAS ● Other INTRINSIC (RESTING) FUNCTION CARDIAC INSULT (e.g., myocardial infarct, chronic hypertension) PRIMARY DAMAGE ATTENUATION 1. heart rate 2. contractility 3. Frank-Starling mechanism 4. Hypertrophy *
2
1 -adrenergic signaling Myopathic pathways, PKA independent Fetal gene Program induction Apoptosis Other ( P-PLN, altered metabolism, P-RyR 2, etc) Cardiac function, PKA dependent Systolic function Diastolic function Heart rate + – Yang Yin Ideal anti-adrenergic Rx Progressive Desensitization: Arrhythmias
3
altered receptor signal transduction decreased myocardial reserve, decreased max exercise progressive myocardial dysfunction adverse biologic effects on cardiac myocytes HEART FAILURE modulatable function intrinsic function chamber mass, volumes INCREASED CARDIAC NE support of myocardial function short-term long-term Exercise Tolerance EF -blockade
4
% of Total [22] [23] LV AS [24] Conc Hty Ecc Hty Conc Remod
5
mean SEM *p<0.05 vs. respective chamber in nonfailing heart ‡ p<0.05 vs. respective chamber in biventricular failure § p<0.05 vs. LV Nonfailing (n=12) Biventricular failure (n=54) PPH, isolated RV failure (n=12) 0 20 40 60 80 100 LVRVLVRV fmol/mg § § * ** ‡ ‡ 11 22
6
Nonfailing (n=9) Biventricular failure (n=39) PPH, isolated RV failure (n=5) mean SEM *p<0.05 vs. respective chamber in nonfailing heart ‡ p<0.05 vs. respective chamber in biventricular failure § p<0.05 vs. LV 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 LVRVLV RV Norepinephrine NPY ng/g (NE) or pg/mg (NPY) * * * ‡ ‡ § § * * * § ‡ M10043
7
Molecules x 10 5 /µg total RNA 1 AR 2 AR 1 AR 2 AR Molecules x 10 5 /µg total RNA Receptor density (fmol/mg) -MHC -MHC ANPSRCA
8
C U V I Carvedilol LV [37] (n=21) Carvedilol RV (n=11) p <0.05 vs. placebo * % change from baseline EFDVISVIEFDVI 50 40 30 20 10 0 –10 –20 –30 Placebo LV (n=15) Placebo RV (n=11) SVI †p <0.05 vs. BsL † † † † CarvedilolPlacebo * * * * * [38] [37] [38]
9
0 0.1 1.0 10 100 -0.1 -10 -100 1 AR 2 AR ANP SRCA MHC MHC Responders (n=26): LVEF 20 2 39 2; RVEF 32 2 43 2 Nonresponders (n=6): LVEF 20 2 18 3; RVEF 40 3 38 6 * p<.05 vs. not improved # p<.05 vs. BSL † p <.10 vs. BSL Change in Gene Expression Molecules mRNA 105/ g Total RNA # # *, #, *, # * † 0 ¶ p <.05 vs. Placebo, test for interaction ¶
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.