1. University of Waterloo A Software Engineering Program: University of Waterloo Flavour Implementing a Joint Software Engineering Program Joanne M. Atlee Department of Computer Science William J. Wilson Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

2. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20012 Introduction n Background n Stages of development n Approval process n Program Implementation

3. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20013 History - Joint SE Option n SE specialization of CS and CE programs n Joint development of Option curriculum and SE courses n Shared delivery of courses and curriculum updates n Started in Fall 1995 Good, but n couldn’t cover all SE material in Option courses n CS/SE graduates weren’t eligible to become P.Eng.

4. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20014 “Ideal” SE Program? n developed by ad hoc committee of SE faculty from both departments J. Atlee, P. Dasiewicz, R. Holt, M. Godfrey, K. Kontogiannis, S. Leue, A. Pidduck, B. Preiss, R. Seviora, A. Singh, G. Weddell n with input from different recommendations, programs, and professional requirements ACM, IEEE, SEI, CEAB, CIPS, other SE programs n proposed a new SE program in terms of non affiliated courses (SE courses)

5. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20015 Presentation to Departments n presented in an open forum and at individual department meetings n cautious approval in concept n each department had some concerns about y insufficient courses from its domain y whether SE was a distinct discipline (CS) y whether SE was an engineering discipline (E&CE) y how it would work n required more specific details in terms of implementation and curriculum

6. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20016 Implementation Working Group n two chairs, two U/G associate chairs and two other representatives from each department n two goals: y Refine the initial curriculum into a “working model” y Define an feasible operational structure for a truly joint program

7. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20017 Curriculum Refinement n use existing courses where possible (CS, E&CE, Math and Science courses) n clearly define course descriptions for SE labeled courses n make sure the program could satisfy professional requirements (CEAB and CIPS)

8. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20018 Some Major Operational Questions n Which faculty would the SE students belong to? y Both! n What degree would they receive? y Bachelor of Software Engineering, BSE. n Who would be responsible for running the SE program? y The Director of the Software Engineering Program, Jo Atlee, reporting to a Software Engineering Board.

9. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 20019 Some Major Operational Questions n Who would be responsible for curriculum development? y A SE curriculum committee with approvals required through both departments and faculties. n What type of program model should be used? y An all Coop, cohort based program.

10. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200110 Approval Process n The detailed proposal was taken to CS & E&CE departments. (fall, 1999) y Major discussions with some reservations, but it was approved in both departments. n The calendar description was prepared based on the detailed proposal. (late fall, 1999) y Some refinements were required in the “other issues”, but received final approval by the two faculties, followed by senate approval early in 2000.

11. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200111 SE Program Implementation n Promoting the program y advertizing the program externally y explaining the program internally n Negotiating policy and procedures details n Developing curricula and labs Nuturing an SE identity

12. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200112 More Major Operational Details n Admissions process, criteria, deflections n Rules for promoting students through the program n Teaching resources n Instructional support y lab technicians vs. course co-ordinators n TA salaries, duties n Budget

13. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200113 More Minor Operational Details n Orientation n Faculty-specific awards y scholarships y upper-year awards, graduation awards e.g. Dean’s (or Deans’) Honours List n Representation in Federation of Students n Lockers n Graduation ceremony, colour

14. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200114 Nuturing an SE Identity n Goal is for SE students to form their own identity n SE Students should feel like they belong to both the Engineering Faculty and the Math Faculty n To foster this, we are creating y an SE program office y SE-specific labs, reading room, meeting space y SE-specific courses, course sections y SE advising all within “neutral territory”

15. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200115 Observations and Lessons Learned n Inter-Faculty programs are many times more difficult and time-consuming to mount n Requires all levels of administration throughout the university to buy into the concept n Requires trust between CS and E&CE n Requires flexibility and willingness to question decisions made for current students and to make unique decisions/solutions for SE students

16. University of Waterloo May 31, 2001CCCEE 200116 Observations and Lessons Learned n Process has been educational for both Faculties n Resulting program is significantly better than what might have been produced independently by either department