1. Fidelity of Strategy Implementation (FSI) Tool Overview, Scoring, and Reporting 1 Washington Migrant Education Program

2. Purposes 1.To inform the implementation evaluation of the Washington MEP as required by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Migrant Education. 2.To measure the level of implementation of each Strategy to determine the extent to which MEP services are delivered with fidelity. 3.To serve as a self-assessment guide to local MEPs in implementing migrant-funded services in the 4 Goal Areas of: 1) Reading, 2) Mathematics, 3) Graduation, and 4) Migrant English Language Learners. 2

3. Washington MEP Strategies READING: 1-1 Provide reading support in summer programs focused in the areas of comprehension and academic vocabulary development MATH: 2-1 Provide math support in summer programs to strengthen mathematics vocabulary, problem solving, algebraic sense, and procedural concepts. 3

4. Washington MEP Strategies GRADUATION: 3-1 Provide opportunities during the summer for migrant students to participate in credit retrieval programs (e.g., Dare to Dream, summer programs providing credit recovery). MIGRANT ELLs: 4-1 Migrant programs collaborate with the State Transitional Bilingual Instructional Program (TBIP), Title III (extended day, summer, or intersession programming), or other applicable resources to ensure that migrant ELLs are receiving language development services. 4

5. Directions for Completing the FSI Convene a group of key MEP staff, discuss each Strategy, and come to consensus on each of the ratings. Place a checkmark in the box that best reflects your project’s level of implementation of each of the Strategies in the 4 Goal Areas. If a particular Strategy is not applicable to your project, write “Not Applicable” in the Evidence box. 5

6. FSI Ratings Ratings are based on a 5-point rubric: 1 = Not Evident 2 = Aware 3 = Developing 4 = Succeeding (considered “proficient”) 5 = Exceeding 6

7. 7

8. Directions for Completing the FSI, Cont. Document examples of evidence used to determine each Strategy’s rating. Potential evidence examples are provided. Highlight in yellow evidence examples provided that are relevant to your project and add any additional examples in the box below. Indicate comments or follow-up needed for each of the Strategies. 8

9. Directions for Completing the FSI, Cont. Regular year only projects please submit your completed FSI to Sylvia Reyna by May 31, 2016 Year-round projects please submit your completed FSI to Sylvia by August 31, 2016 9

10. Questions? Sylvia Reyna sylvia.reyna@k12.wa.us Cari Semivan External Evaluator capan1@aol.com 10