Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1.

Published byCameron Davidson Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1."— Presentation transcript:

1 How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1

2 Issues for discussion 2

3 Q1/Additional Q#13: “in the root zone” 3 Let’s not get trapped by three words… Lawyers shall ensure: ★ ICANN is not in charge overall of names in the DNS. ★ ICANN has policy authority over what labels go into the root zone. ★ Additional conditions can be imposed on the registry operating the TLD, but must be in the Picket Fence.

4 Q2: “The scope of grandparenting” 4 Let’s not get trapped by one word…. Lawyers shall ensure: ★ Existing Ry and Rr agreements can be renewed ★ Applicants of the current “round” can sign the Ry agreement in the currently used form ★ The t&cs of new form gTLD Ry and Rr agreements are not grandfathered

5 Q6: “Removing colleages by the Board” 5 The possibility for the Board to remove colleagues remains unaltered. Lawyers shall ensure: ★ The Board must be able to remove colleagues. Formal requirements must be baked into the bylaws. ★ The CCWG recommendations do not suggest that the approval or any other decision from the EC is required to exercise that power.

6 Q29/Additional Q#22: “Removing NomCom Board members” 6 Lawyers to redraft the question not to refer to the carevout. We did not receive anything so far, but the answer is moot anyway as the carveout is not applicable to Board Member removal. Lawyers shall ensure: ★..that no mentioning of the carveout is made in the bylaws when it comes to individual Board Member removal.

7 Q33/AddQ#5: “Mediation and Community IRP” 7 Questions from redrafted lawyers Q. Escalation to lead to Mediation automatically? Lawyers shall ensure: ★ …

8 “Uncontested” comments 8

9 Additional Q #1: Selection of IRP Panel 9 The selection of the IRP panel is deemed not to be sufficiently community driven Lawyers shall ensure: ★ Process “in consultation with the community” is not strong enough ★ The selection process must be truly community driven ★ The role of the Board is only to confirm or veto proposed Panelists

10 Additional Q #2: IRP Rules of Procedure 10 Members of the global Internet community shall develop processes for the IRP that are governed by clearly understood and pre-published rules applicable to all parties (“Rules of Procedure”). Lawyers shall ensure: ★ The community driven nature of the establishment of the rules of procedure should be reinforced in the Bylaws

11 Questions from our group 11

12 Additional Q #8: PICs 12 Jorge’s question why PICs are not mentioned explicitly in Sec 1.1 d)iv). Lawyers to respond, unless Jorge confirms the answer given on April 5 was satisfactory.

13 Additional Q #10/15/17/18/20/21: RR/IRP 13 -Applicability of RR/IRP before implementation of FOI -Disputes on “resources for protocol parameters” or “disputes relating to protocol parameters” -Definition of “Staff” ambiguous -4.3(o)(vii) Should it also (or instead) refer to the cost shifting in (r)? -Shall decisions be suspended pending resolution? -4.3(x)(ii)(B) Can anyone or just the EC start a court action to enforce an IRP decision if the Board rejects – should be made clear? -4.3(x)(iii) Lawyers to refine language re interplay of arbitration provisions in Ry and Rr agreements Lawyers shall ensure:

14 Additional Q #11: Carveout 14 Lawyers have been asked to reword the carveout Lawyers shall ensure: ★ The lawyers are requested to ensure that the applicability of the carveout is not broadened.

15 Additional Q #12: Mission & Regulation 15 Malcolm had identified a discrepancy between the report and the bylaws. Lawyers have been asked to review a middle ground proposal by Becky.

16 Additional Q #16: Global Internet Community 16 Term should be defined, but how? Lawyers shall ensure: ★ …

17 Additional Q #19: IANA Budget 17 22.4(b)(ii): Why distinguish IETF and IAB? Andrew suggests to drop either, but IAB is easier to consult with. Lawyers shall ensure: ★ …

18 Additional Q#23/24: 25.2 18 Should the composition of SO/ACs be a fundamental bylaw? Copy and paste glitch at the end of 25.2 (e) and (f)? Lawyers shall ensure: ★ …

Download ppt "How to resolve the pending issues? Three categories of input: ★ Issues for discussion ★ “uncontested” comments ★ Questions from our group 1."

Similar presentations

GNSO goals Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Sao Paulo, 4 Dec 2006.

GNSO goals Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Sao Paulo, 4 Dec 2006.
ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.

ICANN Plan for Enhancing Internet Security, Stability and Resiliency.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.

Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)

ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Kuala Lumpur 24 July 2004 ICANN/ITU workshop Framing ccTLD relations Linking global and national responsibilities.

Kuala Lumpur 24 July 2004 ICANN/ITU workshop Framing ccTLD relations Linking global and national responsibilities.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.

Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Internationalized Domain Names Status Report Prepared for: ICANN Meeting, Lisbon 29 March, 2007 Tina Dam IDN Program Director ICANN

Internationalized Domain Names Status Report Prepared for: ICANN Meeting, Lisbon 29 March, 2007 Tina Dam IDN Program Director ICANN
ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.

ICANN/ccTLD Agreements: Why and How Andrew McLaughlin Monday, January 21, 2002 TWNIC.
Implementing the new Workload Policy Heads of School Workshop April 2010.

Implementing the new Workload Policy Heads of School Workshop April 2010.
Draft compilation of major trends in the CWG Public Consultation 25 May 2015.

Draft compilation of major trends in the CWG Public Consultation 25 May 2015.
Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.

Transition of U.S. Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Stewardship of the IANA Functions to the Global.
Introduction to CDNC CDNC Secretariat Walter Wu. What’s CDNC n CDNC ( The Chinese Domain Name Consortium) was formally established on May 20, 2000. n.

Introduction to CDNC CDNC Secretariat Walter Wu. What’s CDNC n CDNC ( The Chinese Domain Name Consortium) was formally established on May 20, n.
1 Updated as of 1 July 2014 About ICANN KISA-ICANN Language Localisation Project Module 1.1.

1 Updated as of 1 July 2014 About ICANN KISA-ICANN Language Localisation Project Module 1.1.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING

APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
Registrars SG Briefing- Vertical Integration Special Trademark Issues Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 8 March 2010.

Registrars SG Briefing- Vertical Integration Special Trademark Issues Margie Milam Senior Policy Counselor ICANN 8 March 2010.
Review, Redress, Empowerment CCWG-ACCT. Mission In accordance with Bylaws, coordinate the global Internet’s systems of unique identifiers by: – Coordinating.

Review, Redress, Empowerment CCWG-ACCT. Mission In accordance with Bylaws, coordinate the global Internet’s systems of unique identifiers by: – Coordinating.
IANA Department Activities, RIPE 66, Dublin, Ireland May 2013 Elise Gerich.

IANA Department Activities, RIPE 66, Dublin, Ireland May 2013 Elise Gerich.
Enhancing ICANN Accountability. | 2 CCWG-Accountability Scope  During discussions around the IANA functions stewardship transition the community raised.

Enhancing ICANN Accountability. | 2 CCWG-Accountability Scope  During discussions around the IANA functions stewardship transition the community raised.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google