Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Supplementary material. Supplementary Figure 1. – Total phenolic content before and after the fining experiments in 250ml bottles, for the three types.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Supplementary material. Supplementary Figure 1. – Total phenolic content before and after the fining experiments in 250ml bottles, for the three types."— Presentation transcript:

1 Supplementary material

2 Supplementary Figure 1. – Total phenolic content before and after the fining experiments in 250ml bottles, for the three types of wine tested. Untreated wine: NT. Wines treated with: Yeast protein extracts: BCV1 and BCV5; Bent: Bentonite; Cas: Casein; PVPP: Polyvinylpolypyrrolidon; VP: Vegetable protein. Bars indicate mean ± SD (n = 3).

3 Supplementary Figure 2. Chromatic characterization using CIELab system: Saturation (C*), Brilliance (L*), Green (-a*) and Yellow (b*) values. Results were obtained before and after treatment of wine 2 with YPE and different fining agents. Two dosages were tested by treatment (Min.-minimum; Max.- maximum).

4 Supplementary Figure 3. Chromatic characterization using CIELab system: Saturation (C*), Brilliance (L*), Green (-a*) and Yellow (b*) values. Results were obtained before and after treatment of wine 3 with YPE and different fining agents. Two dosages were tested by treatment (Min.-minimum; Max.- maximum).

5 Wine 1 Density (g/L) Ethanol (% vol) Volatile acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) Tritable acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) pH Glycerol (g/L) Malic Acid (g/L) Lactic Acid (g/L) Total SO 2 (mg/L) Free SO 2 (mg/L) BCV1 10g/hL 987,5 ± 0,213,56 ± 0,170,64 ± 0,057,47 ± 0,053,29 ± 0,016,81 ± 0,050,93 ± 0,021,09 ± 0,01105,1 ± 0,044,9 ± 0,4 20g/hL 987,6 ± 0,313,50 ± 0,150,63 ± 0,027,41 ± 0,013,30 ± 0,056,79 ± 0,010,91 ± 0,011,07 ± 0,00104,3 ± 0,045,2 ± 0,4 BCV5 10g/hL 987,5 ± 0,313,54 ± 0,150,63 ± 0,017,47 ± 0,023,30 ± 0,046,75 ± 0,000,95 ± 0,021,08 ± 0,00103,5 ± 0,245,0 ± 0,3 20g/hL 987,6 ± 0,313,51 ± 0,150,63 ± 0,007,46 ± 0,003,29 ± 0,026,80 ± 0,001,02 ± 0,031,07 ± 0,00105,0 ± 0,045,4 ± 0,5 Bent 10g/hL 987,7 ± 0,513,44 ± 0,150,68 ± 0,017,03 ± 0,103,27 ± 0,016,75 ± 0,020,96 ± 0,061,05 ± 0,01104,7 ± 0,045,8 ± 0,2 60g/hL 988,2 ± 0,213,19 ± 0,160,68 ± 0,027,08 ± 0,033,29 ± 0,016,82 ± 0,031,00 ± 0,011,07 ± 0,01103,6 ± 0,145,1 ± 0,3 Cas 20g/hL 987,8 ± 0,413,34 ± 0,100,70 ± 0,066,83 ± 0,053,28 ± 0,026,93 ± 0,011,12 ± 0,00 105,1 ± 0,544,9 ± 0,2 100g/hL 988,1 ± 0,313,11 ± 0,110,69 ± 0,056,63 ± 0,073,31 ± 0,047,02 ± 0,001,17 ± 0,021,08 ± 0,00103,4 ± 0,145,2 ± 0,1 PVPP 10g/hL 987,9 ± 0,313,47 ± 0,150,68 ± 0,057,43 ± 0,103,28 ± 0,006,87 ± 0,020,89 ± 0,011,12 ± 0,02105,1 ± 0,144,8 ± 0,2 80g/hL 988,0 ± 0,613,31 ± 0,150,68 ± 0,047,28 ± 0,043,28 ± 0,016,82 ± 0,030,90 ± 0,001,08 ± 0,02105,4 ± 0,545,3 ± 0,0 VP 20g/hL 987,9 ± 0,213,47 ± 0,150,68 ± 0,007,39 ± 0,103,28 ± 0,057,01 ± 0,010,91 ± 0,031,10 ± 0,00104,0 ± 0,845,2 ± 0,5 60g/hL 988,0 ± 0,113,38 ± 0,150,68 ± 0,017,32 ± 0,023,30 ± 0,016,85 ± 0,000,91 ± 0,001,08 ± 0,00103,3 ± 0,145,2 ± 0,6 NT 988,3 ± 0,213,04 ± 0,150,70 ± 0,106,69 ± 0,023,31 ± 0,007,21 ± 0,021,22 ± 0,051,05 ± 0,00105,2 ± 0,145,3 ± 0,5 Supplementary Table 1. Conventional oenological parameters acquired by Infrared Fourier-transform spectrometer – Wine 1. Wines treated with: Yeast protein extracts: BCV1 and BCV5; Bent: Bentonite; Cas: Casein; PVPP: Polyvinylpolypyrrolidon; VP: Vegetable protein. Untreated wine: NT. Results are relative to fining experiments after fermentation, performed in triplicates. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

6 Wine 2 Density (g/L) Ethanol (% vol) Volatile acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) Tritable acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) pH Glycerol (g/L) Malic Acid (g/L) Lactic Acid (g/L) Total SO 2 (mg/L) Free SO 2 (mg/L) BCV1 10g/hL 989,8 ± 0,113,32 ± 0,150,60 ± 0,046,53 ± 0,013,40 ± 0,015,81 ± 0,031,15 ± 0,01 0,52 ± 0,02 113,1 ± 0,134,9 ± 0,5 20g/hL 989,8 ± 0,313,27 ± 0,170,60 ± 0,036,51 ± 0,023,40 ± 0,026,03 ± 0,021,19 ± 0,02 0,48 ± 0,04 114,3 ± 0,035,2 ± 0,4 BCV5 10g/hL 989,7 ± 0,113,30 ± 0,150,58 ± 0,006,58 ± 0,073,39 ± 0,016,22 ± 0,031,19 ± 0,01 0,51 ± 0,01 112,5 ± 0,434,0 ± 0,3 20g/hL 989,6 ± 0,113,27 ± 0,110,54 ± 0,056,64 ± 0,033,38 ± 0,046,32 ± 0,051,27 ± 0,03 0,50 ± 0,02 115,0 ± 0,532,0 ± 0,5 Bent 10g/hL 989,1 ± 0,213,20 ± 0,170,60 ± 0,006,64 ± 0,053,35 ± 0,026,21 ± 0,010,98 ± 0,04 0,35 ± 0,03 112,7 ± 0,334,0 ± 0,4 60g/hL 989,3 ± 0,413,02 ± 0,170,60 ± 0,066,44 ± 0,023,37 ± 0,046,05 ± 0,051,04 ± 0,02 0,41 ± 0,02 114,6 ± 0,337,0 ± 0,1 Cas 20g/hL 989,3 ± 0,213,18 ± 0,100,62 ± 0,056,65 ± 0,003,36 ± 0,026,01 ± 0,021,13 ± 0,03 0,29 ± 0,04 117,1 ± 0,335,0 ± 0,1 100g/hL 989,4 ± 0,212,97 ± 0,170,57 ± 0,026,44 ± 0,023,38 ± 0,036,54 ± 0,051,10 ± 0,02 0,27 ± 0,04 112,4 ± 0,435,2 ± 0,2 PVPP 10g/hL 989,9 ± 0,013,29 ± 0,110,59 ± 0,066,64 ± 0,013,36 ± 0,026,80 ± 0,030,87 ± 0,02 0,53 ± 0,00 115,1 ± 0,036,0 ± 0,1 80g/hL 990,0 ± 0,613,10 ± 0,100,58 ± 0,036,51 ± 0,033,36 ± 0,046,52 ± 0,020,90 ± 0,03 0,51 ± 0,00 116,4 ± 0,032,0 ± 0,0 VP 20g/hL 989,9 ± 0,213,26 ± 0,140,59 ± 0,036,60 ± 0,033,36 ± 0,026,69 ± 0,020,90 ± 0,04 0,52 ± 0,01 103,0 ± 0,336,0 ± 0,1 60g/hL 990,0 ± 0,213,20 ± 0,150,59 ± 0,056,50 ± 0,053,37 ± 0,016,65 ± 0,050,92 ± 0,05 0,50 ± 0,01 103,3 ± 0,137,0 ± 0,4 NT 989,3 ± 0,012,96 ± 0,170,53 ± 0,046,49 ± 0,033,36 ± 0,007,02 ± 0,051,20 ± 0,05 0,27 ± 0,00 115,2 ± 0,035,3 ± 0,6 Supplementary Table 2. Conventional oenological parameters acquired by Infrared Fourier-transform spectrometer – Wine 2. Wines treated with: Yeast protein extracts: BCV1 and BCV5; Bent: Bentonite; Cas: Casein; PVPP: Polyvinylpolypyrrolidon; VP: Vegetable protein. Untreated wine: NT. Results are relative to fining experiments after fermentation, performed in triplicates. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).

7 Wine 3 Density (g/L) Ethanol (% vol) Volatile acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) Tritable acidity (g/L H 2 SO 4 ) pH Glycerol (g/L) Malic Acid (g/L) Lactic Acid (g/L) Total SO 2 (mg/L) Free SO 2 (mg/L) BCV1 10g/hL 989,4 ± 0,015,60 ± 0,130,86 ± 0,027,69 ± 0,013,33 ± 0,007,21 ± 0,021,31 ± 0,010,75 ± 0,02125,1 ± 0,152,0 ± 0,1 20g/hL 989,5 ± 0,315,53 ± 0,120,85 ± 0,017,63 ± 0,043,34 ± 0,017,23 ± 0,051,34 ± 0,030,73 ± 0,08124,3 ± 0,353,0 ± 0,5 BCV5 10g/hL 989,5 ± 0,415,58 ± 0,180,86 ± 0,007,66 ± 0,013,33 ± 0,007,22 ± 0,021,28 ± 0,000,76 ± 0,05124,5 ± 0,154,0 ± 0,4 20g/hL 989,7 ± 0,115,50 ± 0,160,86 ± 0,027,57 ± 0,053,33 ± 0,027,16 ± 0,001,23 ± 0,000,74 ± 0,00126,0 ± 0,045,4 ± 0,3 Bent 10g/hL 989,7 ± 0,015,48 ± 0,200,95 ± 0,026,97 ± 0,033,32 ± 0,037,11 ± 0,061,12 ± 0,050,52 ± 0,05128,7 ± 0,252,0 ± 0,2 60g/hL 989,7 ± 0,015,23 ± 0,160,93 ± 0,016,68 ± 0,003,34 ± 0,067,10 ± 0,061,07 ± 0,020,47 ± 0,01130,6 ± 0,052,0 ± 0,1 Cas 20g/hL 989,8 ± 0,115,42 ± 0,150,95 ± 0,026,94 ± 0,023,33 ± 0,027,05 ± 0,051,16 ± 0,030,52 ± 0,03122,1 ± 0,150,0 ± 0,0 100g/hL 989,8 ± 0,615,15 ± 0,110,91 ± 0,016,69 ± 0,043,35 ± 0,087,01 ± 0,030,99 ± 0,000,50 ± 0,06123,4 ± 0,251,0 ± 0,2 PVPP 10g/hL 990,1 ± 0,015,43 ± 0,130,91 ± 0,037,58 ± 0,003,33 ± 0,057,13 ± 0,001,03 ± 0,010,78 ± 0,04125,1 ± 0,052,0 ± 0,1 80g/hL 990,1 ± 0,315,33 ± 0,100,91 ± 0,027,50 ± 0,013,35 ± 0,057,14 ± 0,010,99 ± 0,000,74 ± 0,04123,4 ± 0,053,0 ± 0,8 VP 20g/hL 990,2 ± 0,115,39 ± 0,120,91 ± 0,017,64 ± 0,003,33 ± 0,017,05 ± 0,011,07 ± 0,020,77 ± 0,03122,5 ± 0,554,0 ± 0,3 60g/hL 990,3 ± 0,515,14 ± 0,100,90 ± 0,007,51 ± 0,013,33 ± 0,007,11 ± 0,001,05 ± 0,050,73 ± 0,01130,2 ± 0,155,0 ± 0,1 NT 989,8 ± 0,015,49 ± 0,210,89 ± 0,027,64 ± 0,023,32 ± 0,027,56 ± 0,021,04 ± 0,030,78 ± 0,00127,2 ± 0,251,0 ± 0,0 Supplementary Table 3. Conventional oenological parameters acquired by Infrared Fourier-transform spectrometer – Wine 3. Wines treated with: Yeast protein extracts: BCV1 and BCV5; Bent: Bentonite; Cas: Casein; PVPP: Polyvinylpolypyrrolidon; VP: Vegetable protein. Untreated wine: NT. Results are relative to fining experiments after fermentation, performed in triplicates. Values are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).


Download ppt "Supplementary material. Supplementary Figure 1. – Total phenolic content before and after the fining experiments in 250ml bottles, for the three types."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google