Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFelicity Kelly Modified over 8 years ago
1
Impact of erosion prevention measures on yield and economic benefits of maize production in NW Vietnam Oleg Nicetic Centre for communication and social change School of journalism and communication
3
Improved market engagement for sustainable upland production systems in the North West Highlands of Vietnam Vietnamese partners: Northern Mountainous Agriculture and Forestry Science Institute (NOMAFSI) Centre for Agrarian Systems Research and Development (CASRAD) Plant Protection Research Institute (PPRI) Hanoi Agricultural University (HUA) Australian commissioned organisation: University of Queensland Centre for communication and Social Change
4
Present practice Feb Mar Dry season Burn Apr May Moderate rain Sowing June Sep Rainy season Crop develop Harvest Oct Feb Dry season Free grazing DFeb Marry season Dry season MT + Mulch No tillage (2011) Apr May Moderate rain Sowing 1 st crop June July Rainy season Crop develop Harvest End Aug Nov Moderate rain-dry from October Second crop Erosion Experimental practice Feb Mar
5
Lung Su Phin –Ta Ngao - Sin Ho – Lai Chau
6
Household education profile
7
Profile of agricultural production 1.46 ha (SE=0.21 and med=1.40) of agricultural land
8
Distance between fields and farmer’s house
9
Proportion of cultivation on slopes/flats
10
Erosion prevention experiment Mini-terraces Mulch + Fertiliser Mini-terraces No-Mulch + Fertiliser Farmer practice (not part of design) Burn and no inputs
11
Mini-terraces + mulch+ fertiliser vs. burn + no inputs
12
Yield Ta Ngao
13
Farmer’s feedback Mini terraces require lot of work: 3 days for 1000 m 2 and our way only 2 days. Fertilisers are expensive may be to big investment. You may not understand but Hmong don’t want to sell. If we get lot of corn we will store it for 2 years but will not sell.
14
UnitPrice (dong)AmountValue (dong) FarmerMT+MulchMTFarmerMT+MulchMT Variety (local) kg00000 Biofertiliser Song Gianh kg2,70001,000 02,700,000 Urea kg6,8000330 02,244,000 NPK (5:10:3) kg3,7000500 01,850,000 Photphate kg3,0000500 01,500,000 Kaliclorua kg14,0000240 03,360,000 Pestiside 0 0 0 0 00 Labour day6810090 I-INPUT COST 011,654,000 II-INCOME kg4,5002,5006,2905,18711,250,00028,305,00023,342,000 III-PROFIT dong 11,250,00016,651,00011,688,000 IV PROFIT/ LABOUR DAY Dong/ day 173,077166,510129,866 Economic analysis based on farmers information
15
Na Ha– Na Ot – Mai Son
16
Household education profile
17
Profile of agricultural production 2.97 ha (SE=0.64 and med=2.90)
18
Distance between fields and farmer’s house
19
Proportion of cultivation on slopes/flats
20
Production of rice on terraces and coffee on slopes
21
Map of erosion experiment Burned organic materialMini-terrace + mulchMulch Mini-terrace + mulchBurned organic material MulchMini-terrace + mulch Trench to collect eroded soil 3 replications, 5 m wide + 1m buffer and 20 m long.
22
Experimental design T2-R1 T1-R1 T3-R2 T2-R2 T4-R2 T1-R2
23
Mini-terraces 70 cm
24
Minimum tillage
25
Impact of erosion prevention cultivation on yield
26
Yield
27
Unit Cost (dong)AmountValue (dong) FarmerMT+MulchMulchFarmerMT+MulchMulch Variety (LVN10) kg38,0001700646,000 Variety (LVN 99) kg60,000017 1,020,000 Manure kg3501000035,000 Ure kg6,80050300 340,0002,040,000 NPK (5:10:3) kg3,30010000330,000 Phosphate kg3,1000500 1,550,001,550,000 Kaliclorua kg14,0000150 2,100,000 Pestiside 300,000 Labour day85.5130124 I-INPUT COST 1,351,0007,010,000 II-INCOME kg4,0003,5505,4005,10014,200,00021,600,00020,400,000 III-PROFIT dong 12,850,00014,590,00013,390,000 IV PROFIT/ LABOUR DAY Dong/ day 150,292112,230107,984 Economic analysis based on farmers information
28
Hung Phong – Ban Bo – Tam Duong
29
Household education profile
30
1.20 ha (SE=0.18 and med=1.18) of agricultural land
31
Range of crops are grown
32
Not enough corn for extensive pig production
34
Experiments Variety experiment Intercropping experiments Second crop
35
Intercropping design Black beanMaize 10040353035
36
Variety and intercropping trial – Ban Bo
37
Impact of green mulch (intercropping) and mulch on maize productivity – Moc Chau
38
UnitCost (dong)AmountValue (dong) FarmerProjectFarmerProject Variety (CP999) kg55,000170 Variety (CP999) kg55,000017 Biofertiliser Song Gianh kg2,70001,00002,700,000 Ure kg7,6004003303,040,0002,508,000 NPK (5:10:3) kg3,300500 1,650,000 Photphate kg3,100050001,550,000 Kaliclorua kg14,000024003,360,000 Pestiside 600,000 Labour day84100 I-INPUT COST 4,690,00012,368,000 II-INCOME kg4,5004,0006,72018,000,00030,240,000 III-PROFIT dong 13,310,00017,872,000 IV PROFIT/ LABOUR DAY Dong/ day 158,452178,720 Economic analysis based on farmers information
41
Second crop Maize mono NK4500 Inter-crop maize + peanut Maize mono NK4500 Inter-crop maize + peanutMaize mono NK4500Inter-crop maize + peanut
43
Comparison between erosion prevention strategies Comparison Number of trials Yield T2>T1 Average difference (T/ha) T1T2 BurnMulch77 (4)0.7 (16%) BurnMT+Mulch77 (4)0.9 (20%) MulchMT+Mulch44 (1)0.4 (9%) MTMT+Mulch33(1)0.3 (7%) Mono- cropping Inter-cropping66 (5)0.8 (18%)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.