Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMiranda Johnson Modified over 8 years ago
1
05.04.06 1 ETCS Level 1 Deployment in Luxembourg UIC ERTMS CONFERENCE 2006 BUDAPEST 05.04.2006 François JAEGER Director CFL Member of the CFL board of Directors
2
05.04.06 2 ETCS LEVEL 1 DEPLOYMENT IN LUXEMBOURG SUMMARY 0 - LUXEMBOURG GENERAL INFORMATIONS 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE 3 - PILOT PHASE 4 - ROLLING STOCK 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS 6 - OPEN POINTS AND QUESTIONS 7 - CONCLUSIONS
3
05.04.06 3 0 - LUXEMBOURG General Information Luxembourg Territory: 2586 km 2 Population: ~ 451.000 Border countries:Belgium France Germany LUXEMBOURG
4
05.04.06 4 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK Characteristics - CCSystems in Luxembourg / Neighbourhoods
5
05.04.06 5 1973 CFL introduced crocodile system 1997 the implementation of MEMOR II+ (improvement of the crocodile system) whole fleet 1999 CFL decided to introduce ETCS Level 1 on the complete Luxembourg railway network and to equip the whole rolling stock fleet a German supplier including based on 2002 a German supplier got the order to install ETCS Level 1 on the whole network, including Infill functionality based on Balise a French supplier 2002 a French supplier got the order for the ETCS equipment of a pre-series of 10 engines 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK CCSystem in Luxembourg - History Project supported by EU
6
05.04.06 6 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK Technical migration for ETCS LEVEL 1 No direct interface between LEU* and the Interlocking Signal information picked up by 2 current sensors for each lamp LEU also controls during migration MEMOR II+ Onboard ETCS EVC** controls the transitions between ETCS and MEMOR II+ (cut off in/out interface of MEMOR II+ system) * LEU Line-side Electronic Unit ** EVC European Vital Computer Balises MEMOR II+LEU AntennaEVC
7
05.04.06 7 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE ETCS Level 1 and estimated costs ETCS increases safety level on the network ETCS achieves interoperability between Luxembourg and neighbouring countries Same standard on the whole network Fully compatible with TSI Luxembourg takes a whole network approach (European wide a corridor approach, the Corridor C Antwerp-Basle/Lyon will accelerate ETCS development in the area and the RS onboard migration) for the entire network: Total estimated costs for the entire network: 24.665.406 € (1999)
8
05.04.06 8 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Migration Migration duration : 5 years from 2003 Started with SRS* Version 2.2.2. + several change requests applied in first phase (pilot line) 9 phases are foreseen for ETCS deployment Deployment is line oriented All main signals (v>40km/h) and distant signals are also equipped with Infill functionality (Balises) Determination of the national values Several changes introduced in the national operational rules due to ETCS migration * SRS System Requirement Specification
9
05.04.06 9 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE National Values - Changes in National Operation Rules National Values Changes in National Operation Rules
10
05.04.06 10 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Lineside Electronic Unit and Eurobalise Line-side Electronic Unit Switch-able Balise Signal Electronic Unit
11
05.04.06 11 TROISVIERGES ETTELBRUCK LUXEMBURG KLEINBETTINGEN PETANGE BETTEMBURG ESCH / ALZETTE WASSERBILLIG Phase 1 completed (Pilot phase) 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE State of play Phase 2 completed LORENTZWEILER SANDWEILER DOMMELDANGE WALFERDANGE MERSCH LINTGEN HEISDORF CENTS-HAMM COLMAR-US BÜRDEN ETTELBRUCK DIEKIRCH SCHIEREN BISSEN COLMARBERG CRUCHTEN Phases 3 and 4
12
05.04.06 12 3 - PILOT PHASE SUMM UP of the pilot line ~50 km line equipped with ETCS level 1 10 traction units equipped with ETCS level 1 ETCS Version 2.2.2. + several change requests corresponding to subset 108 All problems solved on an international level, no national solution (UNISIG Group) First tests with CFL D-railcar: December 2003 Commercial service: March 2005 Commercial train kilometres: ~ 16.600 km
13
05.04.06 13 3 - PILOT PHASE Rolling stock - First migration phase achieved 2003-2005 Pilot phase started in 2004 with 10 engines 3 D-Railcar CFL 2100 (same as SNCF X73500) Equipped with ETCS: 12/2003 - 04/2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: 227 074,- € 4 EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) Equipped with ETCS: 09/2004 - 12/2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor (needs two equipments per EMU due to the length of the EMU) Cost per engine: 353 284,- € 3 E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) Equipped with ETCS: 05/2004 - 07/2005 Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: 260 144,- € Total costs for the 10 engines: 3 035 000,-€
14
05.04.06 14 3 - PILOT PHASE Main goals achieved Test components on - Infrastructure - Rolling Stock Test of the system ETCS level 1 Validation of the system Reduction of maintenance costs Improved safety High reliability level No major train delays Project supported by EU
15
05.04.06 15 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration 20062007 2008 18 EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+ Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* Cost per engine: ~300.000,- € 12 EMU CFL 2200 (same as SNCF Z 24500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 16 E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, TBL Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor* 18 Control trailer CFL DABpbdzfa A14 CCS-system: MEMOR II+, PZB (same as DB AG DBpbzfa 766) Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 20 E-Locos CFL 4000 (same as DB AG 185) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, PZB Use: Passenger / freight trains cross-border and on corridor* * corridor C Antwerp - Basle/Lyon
16
05.04.06 16 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Roll-out phase will start when: - equipment prices are acceptable ! - and financing is secured ! (Railway Undertaking and MS + EU Funds)
17
05.04.06 17 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Equipment of the Electric Multiple Unit 2000 DM I Driver Machine Interface EVC European Vital Computer Radar Antenna Speed Sensor Accelerometer
18
05.04.06 18 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (1/2) + ~100 km (double/single track) equipped with ETCS + 10 traction units equipped with ETCS + No major problem to equip (INFRA + RS) + ETCS version 2.2.2. + several change requests corresponding to subset 108 + No national solution implemented + Changing operation rules to introduce ETCS + Commercial service from March 2005 (no major train delays due to the introduction of ETCS) + Commercial train kilometres: ~ 27.100 km + Increased safety level (MEMOR II+)
19
05.04.06 19 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (2/2) + No relevant failures (INFRA + RS) + No interoperability problems between INFRA + RS (two different suppliers) + No interferences with actual system Memor II+ + End of MEMOR II+ by 2017 - Multiple Units need two equipments (additional costs) - Problems with homologation of ETCS RS on other networks (costs and time) - ETCS equipment for RS increases costs currently (costs of prototype and series) - Combined ETCS/National System are not helpful for Interoperability
20
05.04.06 20 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (1/2) Cross acceptance ! Re-examination of the rolling stock authorisation for the modified engines in the bordering countries (long lasting process and high additional costs) Braking curves not unified ! Transition between the different CCSystems ! (No specific STM available in the worst case standing transition) 70% of the trains in Luxembourg are cross-border, traction units need several CCSystems ! Several data recorders within one engine to pass border (JRU, ATESS, DSK) !
21
05.04.06 21 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (2/2) Compatibility problems between ETCS balises and KVB on board equipment ! State of play of the RS migration of other RUs operating in the area ? Retrofitting ETCS on RS is actually a high invest for CFL and other "ETCS RUs" ! State of play of MS and EU funding? Funding prototype (fix costs) and series? All traction units should qualify for EU funds? (Locomotives, multiple units, control trailers,.....)
22
05.04.06 22 7 - MAIN CONCLUSIONS ETCS: in Luxembourg is aligned on the EU policies migration phase for Luxembourg INFRA assured migration phase on RS is challenging (high costs, cross acceptance and different migration strategies of other RUs) on the Corridor C Antwerp- Basle/ Lyon will certainly accelerate the migration in the area (INFRA +RS) is expensive on INFRA and particularly on RS side needs MS and EU funds for INFRA and RS insures interoperability and is an important project for Luxembourg and Europe
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.