Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCarmel Rich Modified over 8 years ago
1
Three Schools of Presidential Evaluation 1
2
Presidential Evaluation: Some Questions 2 I. Do great crises encourage great presidential performance? Do great times make for great leadership or great leaders make great times? Madison, Pierce, Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Hoover vs. Lincoln, Wilson, FDR, Truman Skowronek’s “Political Time” Presidency: “Has Obama called for united America too soon to make politics of reconstruction?”
3
Presidential Evaluation: Some Questions 3 II. A bias in favor of assertive and energetic presidents? John Quincy Adams, Coolidge, Taft suffer in this context How is an energetic president different from an imperial presidency? LBJ, Nixon, and George W. Bush (?)
4
Presidential Evaluation: Some Questions 4 III. Performance in office vs. Achievements over a life-time? Grant: a great general but a weak president Madison: a superb constitutional architect yet an average president Hoover: successful cabinet member but far less successful as a president Carter: a Nobel Prize winner, yet low marks for his presidency
5
Presidential Evaluation: Some Questions 5 IV. Can we objectively compare presidents from different eras? Leadership is truly contextual. Seldom are different presidents facing with the same situations. (Ex) Jefferson and Polk praised for adding vast areas to the territory of the United States, yet recent presidents cannot duplicate those feats.
6
Presidential Election 6 The “chief factors” influencing how people vote in presidential elections Party Orientation (Party ID) Policy Preferences Retrospective judgments on the performance of the incumbent or their political party The way people perceive the integrity, character, and judgment of the candidates
7
Speaking of characters, do they matter? If so, how so? If not, why not? James Barber’s theory of presidential character Important thing for voters in selecting a president not primarily positions on issues and the record of the candidate, but who the candidate is as a person Ex) In 1972 election, George McGovern (active-positive) vs. Richard Nixon (active-negative) The need to screen candidates in the modern world – costs are much higher of choosing wrong!!! Barber successfully predicted the fall of Nixon based on his character. 7
8
James Barber: Presidential Character I “Presidential character” = Not just personality (which is made up of style, world view, and character), but, essentially interacts with the external climate of expectations and creates the dynamics of presidency Style is how the president behaves with regard to rhetoric, people, and work. Sometimes, determined in early adulthood by the “first independent political success.” Richard Nixon’s Senate race in 1950 Nixon called his opponent, Helen Douglas, the “Pink Lady” and won the election and became the VP in 1953. 8
9
James Barber: Presidential Character II Two dimensions of personality Energy that president puts into the job (active/passive) “Does he work hard?” Affect toward the job (positive/ negative) “Does he like the job of presidency?” Creates the “two by two” typology. According to Barber, Active-positives are the best. Active-negatives are the ones to avoid. 9
10
According to Barber, “different characters pursue different goals.” That’s why and how we can choose a better president by understanding presidential character (Barber). Active-positive presidents: they want to achieve results Active-negative presidents: they aim to get and keep power Passive-positive presidents: they are after love http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=X39dGQmBEww (02:05) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=X39dGQmBEww Passive-negative presidents: they emphasize their civic virtue 10
11
Personality and Preference: Explaining Presidential Character 11
12
Barber’s Presidential Psychology 12
13
Psychological approach The lack of fit between (near) great presidents and “active-positive” types? Ex) Washington, Reagan, Eisenhower, Wilson, Lincoln Is personality all that matters? Hoover & the Great Depression Wilson & the World War I LBJ, Nixon & the Vietnam War 13
14
Who gets nominated and elected? I 14 Presidents are usually middle-aged white male Protestant lawyers of European lineage from larger states !!! All but one (JFK) were Protestants. About half have been lawyers and served in Congress Twelve were generals (From Washington to Ike) A presidential candidate must be at least 35 years old, must have lived within the United States for 14 years, and must be a natural-born citizen
15
Who gets nominated and elected? II 15 Vice presidents 7 VP became presidents between 1789 and 1900 Adams, Jefferson, Van Buren, Tyler, Fillmore, Johnson, Arthur 7 VP became presidents between 1901 and 2004 TR, Coolidge, Truman, LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Bush 41
16
Who gets nominated and elected? III 16 Incumbent presidents Won 24 convention renominations between 1836 and 2004 Some pledged to serve a single term (Polk, Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan) Sometimes vulnerable to challenges within their own party Reagan vs. Ford in 1976 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-p-Nuu8hYQ Kennedy vs. Carter in 1980
17
Who gets nominated and elected? IV 17 Department Secretaries Favored only in the congressional caucus system Since 1830s, only 5 cabinet secretaries viable contenders Only Taft (Secretary of War) in 1908 and Hoover (Secretary of Commerce) in 1928 elected to president Governors Have done well in winning presidential nominations 4 in the 19 th century (Polk, Hayes, Cleveland, McKinley) 6 in the 20 th century (Wilson, FDR, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, and Bush 43)
18
Who gets nominated and elected? V 18 Senators & House members Only two in the 20 th century (Harding & JFK) were elected directly from the Senate. 2008 election as an exception = two sitting senators’ race In 1964 and 1972, a sitting senator defeated by a huge margin Voting records and the anti-Washington mood of the voters Only one House member has been elected president = James Garfield in the election of 1880
19
Presidents’ home states: 1877-1932 Ohio and New York as critical states at the turn of the 19 th Century America 19
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.