1. Distribution of the faculty’s age (Japanese BS)

2. Elder or experienced ? Due to Government regulation ( experienced faculty >elder one) PQ requirement more than 30 % (experienced business people > elder) No growth in BS industry in size of each BS (natural aging)

3. Japan’s tradition?

4. Still male society? Big association with age distribution Particularly difficult to employ experienced female faculty

5. How many non—Japanese faculty? Very few ! How many Asian-based faculty ? Very,Very few !

6. New agenda Asian century has come but are we, Japanese business schools ready for the Asian century ? Few prepared well ! Globalization imperatives from Government and business society in Japan but how many non- Japanese faculties will be enough ? how to develop Japanese young faculty for the Asian century there in Japan?

7. My Agenda Many insist on importance of Asian Management. But How to organize research collaboration team in search of we call “Asian Way of Management by young faculties who are deeply embedded in the American business school traditions and experiences ? How to provide with better academic incentive for young faculty to invest in Asian Management research ?

8. For Japanese BS For 5 years we will be happy if AAPBS arrange CFE projects(initiatives), hopefully with “younger” faculties. Many experienced Japanese faculties who could give lectures (2 weeks to 2 months) in English in Asia b-school. Many experienced Japanese technology professors could be good candidates in Asia’s B-schools.

9. CFE Not competitive faculty enclosure ! More support to invite younger faculties and students for their Asian market research. More demand side( importer’s side) than supply side ! Better portfolio for each Asian B-school upon her development stage ( West + East) Effective reallocation of human capital and professors in BS across the borders within Asia

10. finally Not globalized Japanese BS, but Asian BSs in Japan And CFE by AAPBS will be a important first step for Asian BSs. 多謝！ Thanks!