Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArron Cunningham Modified over 8 years ago
1
AAA – 19 YEARS of EXPERIENCE WITH EVAR Hugo F Londero MD, FSCAI Sanatorio Allende – Córdoba - Argentina
2
AAA – 19 YEARS of EXPERIENCE WITH EVAR Parodi initial experience Second Phase: Modular Grafts Third Phase: Design improvement Actual indications
3
Transfemoral Intraluminal Graft Implantation for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. JC Parodi, JC Palmaz and HD Barone. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:491-9
4
2011: Aorto-Aortic stent graft implant - 2013: 12 mm AAA diameter increase Type 3 endoleak
5
2011: Aorto-Aortic stent graft implant - 2013: 12 mm AAA diameter increase Type 3 endoleak
6
Parodi ´s Device – Phase 3
7
AAA – 19 YEARS of EXPERIENCE WITH EVAR Parodi initial experience Second Phase: Modular Grafts Third Phase: Design improvement Actual indications
8
Stentor-Mihalle / Vanguard I-II (No longer available)
9
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle 5 cases Vanguard l-ll 38 cases
10
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Prosthesis Migration: Type l Endoleak Treatment: Cuff implantation Late Complications: Persistent Type I proximal leak
11
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Iliac Stump Dislocation Stent Graft Dislocation
12
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Iliac Stump Dislocation Stent-Graft Dislocation New aneurysmal sac Intraoperative Findings Explanted Endo-graft
13
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Limb Thrombosis Graft Limb Thrombosis Intraoperative Findings Explanted Endo-graft
14
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Limb Thrombosis Suture Breakages
15
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Suture Breakage of the Stent Frame Suture Breakages Stent-Graft Disruption Cuff Implantation inside the Stent Graft
16
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up: 11.9 ± 10 months – Related complications Late Complications: Prosthesis Migration Suture Breakages
17
Favaloro Foundation: Initial Experience 1995-1999 Stenthor-Mihalle ® 5 cases Vanguard l-ll ® 38 cases Follow up 11.9±10 months – Late related complications Total Incidence1023 % Type l Persistent Endoleak24,6 % Type ll Endoleak (Retrograde)12.3 % Type lll Endoleak (Stump Dislocation)12.3 % Graft limb Thrombosis36.9 % Acute Popliteral Occlussion1 2.3 % Suture Breakages of the Stent Frame12.3 % Prosthesis Migration12.3 %
18
AAA – 19 YEARS of EXPERIENCE WITH EVAR Parodi initial experience Second Phase: Modular Grafts Third Phase: Design improvement Actual indications
19
Endologix MedtronicGore Cook
20
DREAM Trial: Long Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. (De Bruin JL et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1881-9)
21
EVAR I Trial: Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms The United Kingdom EVAR trial Investigators (N Engl J Med 2010;362:1863-71)
22
Clinical effect of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endografting: 7 years concurrent comparison with open repair. Cao P et al. J Vasc Surg 2004ñ 40,5:841-8 1119 pacientes (534 EVAR – 585 OR) – seguimiento hasta 7 años Free of reinterventions
23
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Contralateral Iliac-limb Mal-position
26
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Retrograde Disection Type I leak -. Balloon expansion. Retrograde disection.
27
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Type I Endoleaks : Balón Expandable Stent
28
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Endoleaks Tipo Il: Selective embolization
29
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Delayed (5 years) Non Cover Right Common Iliac Aneurysm Rupture
30
Delayed (5 years) Non Cover Right Common Iliac Aneurysm Rupture
31
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience 2009 Endologix prosthesis with a Proximal Fre-flow Cuff and Distal Extension
32
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience 2014 - Endologic Stent Graft components dislogement
33
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Balloon expandable knitted dacron covered stent deployed between the main body and proximal extension.
34
EVAR II Trial: Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysm in Patients Physically Ineligible For Open Repair-The United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2010;362:1872-80
35
DREAM Trial: Long Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. (De Bruin JL et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1881-9)
36
EVAR I Trial: Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms The United Kingdom EVAR trial Investigators (N Engl J Med 2010;362:1863-71)
37
Clinical effect of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endografting: 7 years concurrent comparison with open repair. Cao P et al. J Vasc Surg 2004ñ 40,5:841-8 1119 pacientes (534 EVAR – 585 OR) – seguimiento hasta 7 años Global Survival
38
Randomized Trial comparing EVAR vs. Surveillance in small AAA (CAESAR - PIVOTAL)
39
AAA – 19 YEARS of EXPERIENCE WITH EVAR Parodi initial experience Second Phase: Modular Grafts Third Phase: Design improvement Actual indications
40
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at high surgical risk must be carefully selected for EVAR, avoiding severe co-morbidities that significant reduce life expectancy and including patients with Surgical Impairments that not compromise the life expectancy Patients at normal surgical risk and moderate limited life expectancy, due to the age or systemic diseases, are good candidates for EVAR There are not evidences that small aneurysms could be beneficiate with EVAR.
41
Thank you very much !
42
A AA Endovascular Treatment Indications: High Surgical Risk Aneurysms Normal Surgical Risk Aneurysms Low Anatomical Risk Aneurysms
43
EVAR 2 Trial : Non Surgical High Risk Candidates AAA ≥ 5.5 cm. 338 randomized patients MEDICAL TREATMENT N=172 ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT N=166 END POINTS: Global Mortality Aneurysm Related Mortality Health Realated Quality of life Postoperative Complications Hospital costs Endovascular Repair of Aortic Aneurysm in Patients Physically Ineligible For Open Repair-The United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2010;362:1872-80
44
EVAR 2 TRIAL – CRITICS: Low Adherence to protocol (20% Cross over to EVAR) High Hospital Mortality (9%) 6 ruptures waiting for treatment High Risk is not synonym of moribund LESONS LEARNED: The patients at high surgical risk must be carefully selected for EVAR: Avoid severe co-morbidities that significant reduce life expectancy Include patients with Surgical Impairments that not compromise the life expectancy
45
A AA Endovascular Treatment Indications: High Surgical Risk Aneurysms Normal Surgical Risk Aneurysms Low Anatomical Risk Aneurysms
46
DREAM Trial 6 years evolution: Patients suitable for EVAR or Surgery AAA ≥ 5.0 cm. 86.5 - 91.9% ASA Class I ó II 351 randomized patients SURGICAL TREATMENT N=178 ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT N=173 END POINTS: Global Mortality AAA related mortality Complications and re-interventions Long Term Outcome of Open or Endovascular repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. De Bruin JL et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1881-9
47
EVAR 1 Trial –5-10 years Evolution : Patients suitable for EVAR or Surgery AAA ≥ 5.5 cm. 1082 randomized patients SURGICAL TREATMENT N=626 ENDOASCULAR TREATMENT N=626 END POINTS: Death Graft Related Complications Re Interventions Resources Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms The United Kingdom EVAR trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2010;362:1863-71
49
Clinical effect of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endografting: 7 years concurrent comparison with open repair. Cao P et al. J Vasc Surg 2004ñ 40,5:841-8 1119 pacientes (534 EVAR – 585 OR) – seguimiento hasta 7 años AAA realted mortality
50
Note: References should be 12pt Arial bold with the Journal title in Italics Surveillance Group – Aneurysm Repair: CAESAR: 76/178 patients (43%) met criteria to be converted to surgery PIVOTAL: 112/362 Patients (30.9%) underwent aneurysms repair EVAR ------- Surveillance Pivotal Trial: Aneurysm repair
51
Rupture Increased risk: Females: Brown LC et al. Ann Surg 1999;230”289-96 Fillinger MF et al.J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1243-52 Fillinger MF et al. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:724-32 Arterial Hypertension: Brown LC et al. Ann Surg 1999;230:289-96 Cronenwett JL et al. Surgery 1985;98:472-83 Sterpetti AV et al. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:175-78 Foster JH et al. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:1-9 Szilagyi DE et al. Arch Surg 1972;104:600-06 Smokers: Brown LC et al. Ann Surg 1999;230”289-96 Fillinger MF et al.J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1243-52 COPD (FEV 1 -Bronquiectasis): Fillinger MF et al.J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1243-52 Cronenwett JL et al. Surgery 1985;98:472-83
52
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience
53
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Contralateral Iliac-limb Mal-position Endologix Powerlink® bifurcated stent graft (25/100 mm) Proximal extension stent graft (28/75 mm) 34/80 mm proximal extension stent graft Final angiogram. Residual disection
54
Sanatorio Allende: Second Generation Endograft Experience Contralateral Iliac-limb Mal-position Oclusión de arterias renales - Embolización Planeada
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.