Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF."— Presentation transcript:

1 Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

2 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF 2 General Comments Many new facilities are proposed or in progress with SC solenoids providing transverse focusing –SC solenoids are placed in cryomodules in close proximity to cavities Proposals with both single and multiple solenoids in a cryomodule –In low beta section frequent transverse focusing is required Concerns –Interaction of solenoid field on the cavity Promote a quench if field is too high Trap field in case of a quench –Interaction with solenoid field on environment –Alignment of the solenoid Tuning steering coils to compensate misalignment

3 ISAC-II FRIB ANL IUAC SARAF LNL IFMIF B-ISOL Project-X HIE-I Low Beta Hadron Linacs Existing or Proposed using SC Solenoids CADS 11/5/2012 3TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF ReA3

4 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF 4 Upgrades, Projects and Proposals for Ions ProjectLabSC SolRT quadsParticleStructure ISAC-IITRIUMF  HIQWR UpgradeANL  HIQWR HI-LinacIUAC  HIQWR SARAF-ISOREQ  P, dHWR ReA3MSU  HIQWR FRIBMSU  HIQWR, HWR IFMIFVarious  dHWR Project-XFNAL  H-HWR, spoke C-ADSIHEP, IMP  pHWR, spoke B-ISOLCIAE/PKU  P,d,HIQWR, HWR, spoke HIE-REXCERN  HIQWR (sputter) SPIRAL-IIGANIL  P,dQWR RISPKorea  P, HIQWR, HWR, Spoke

5 Some examples TRIUMF ISAC-II Cryomodules – one 9-Tesla solenoid per cryomodule ANL energy upgrade cryomodule – one 9-Tesla solenoid per cryomodule IUAC heavy ion cryomodule – one SC solenoid per cryomodule 11/5/2012 5TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

6 Others with multiple solenoids 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF6 Project X ANL MSU SARAF

7 Residual magnetic field goals 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF7 f (Hz) Rs (nΩ) Residual field will be 100% trapped in the superconductor Vortices will have normal cores which increase surface resistance by Rmag A reasonable goal is to have Rmag ≤ 3nΩ - must have B<30mG at 100MHz and B<10mG at 1GHz

8 Magnetic Issues 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF8 High field solenoid in a cryomodule Can magnetically pollute the environment Components, including mu metal shield, that are in the environment that can be magnetized will be magnetized by the field from the solenoid Can produce field when at zero current Once a field is energized and while still in the superconducting state the solenoid will have `frozen flux’ even when the current is zeroed. problem if cavities warm above transition Can degrade cavity performance during quench through trapped flux in the quench heat zone

9 Magnetic Pollution 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF9 Possible cures: Choose materials that are not easily magnetized 316LN ss – although this can become susceptible to magnetization after welding or cold working Pay attention to hardware – bolts, nuts, especially near high H zones Isolate the cavity from the environment Add cold mu metal around the cavity Adds to expense and complication of assembly Isolate the solenoid from the enviroment Add an iron return core Add a shield around the magnet OR: Start unpolluted and use the solenoid to erase magnet memory by employing a degaussing cycle before every warm-up

10 Magnetic Pollution – ISAC-II Mapped the internal magnetic field with a fluxgate magnetometer 1.SCB3 after solenoid powered then warmed (no hysteresis cycle) 2.SCB1 before powering the solenoid 3.SCB1 after powering the solenoid and with hysteresis cycle Hysteresis cycle required to reduce memory of solenoid 11/5/2012 10TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

11 Frozen flux 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF11 Possible cures: Isolate the cavity from the environment Add cold mu metal around the cavity Adds to expense and complication of assembly Isolate the solenoid from the enviroment Add a shield around the magnet Practical solution: Add a heater to the solenoid to allow heating above transition to quench the flux if required

12 Frozen Flux Mapping data* for ISAC-II Solenoid  Solenoid is brought to 9 T and a)Ramped to zero with no cycle at 4K b)Taken to zero through hysteresis cycle at 4K c)Ramped to zero and warmed to 20K * Data taken by Accel Frozen flux in solenoid produces a large (20G) field in cavity region when no hysteresis cycle is used. Cycling the magnet does reduce the field at the cavity but only warming the solenoid can eliminate the field. 11/5/2012 12TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

13 Perturbing the cavity performance 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF13 Procedurally the solenoid is only turned after the cavity is cold As long as the broadcast field at the cavity Bsol is much less than Hc1 (B~160mT) then the outer wall of the cavity will act as a Meissner shield and stop the flux from penetrating to the rf side Solenoid can be designed with bucking coils to reduce the fringe field at the cavity Brf Bsol

14 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF14 Bucking coils  Focussing in the SC Linac is provided by superconducting solenoids (B  9T)  End fringe fields controlled with active `bucking’ coils (B cavity  0.03T) Cavity Prototype Solenoid at Accel

15 Quench 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF15 However during a quench the stored energy in the cavity will be dissipated at the quench location and depending on the energy content, the wall thickness and the thermal conductivity the outer wall can be heated to produce a normal hole in the superconducting wall The normal hole will soon cool but the flux will trapped lowering the surface resistance in the hot zone thus lowering the cavity Q Brf Bsol

16 Study at FNAL on Quenches with solenoid background field 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF16 Modeling Quench Propagation in Superconducting Cavity Using COMSOL – FNAL Note TD-11-019 I. Terechkine Superconducting Cavity Quenching in the Presence of Magnetic Field – FNAL Note TD-11-020 T. Khabiboulline, J. Ozelis, D. Sergatskov, I. Terechkine SSR1 CAVITY QUENCHING IN THE PRESENCE OF MAGNETIC FIELD – FNAL Note TD-12-007 T. Khabiboulline, D. Sergatskov, I. Terechkine This was studied in two separate cavity tests at FNAL – one with an elliptical cavity and one with a spoke cavity – *thanks to Yuri Terechkine for pointing out the studies

17 FNAL study 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF17 Study 1: A 1.3GHz cavity with a known quench location was installed in the VTA with a solenoid installed in the bath near the quench location – the cavity was quenched at various solenoid field strengths and the cavity Q was measured Study 2: A 325MHz spoke cavity was placed near a solenoid and resistive heaters were placed at various locations to initiate quenches with a pulse of heat from the bath side – the Q of the cavity was measured as a function of the solenoid field and the position of the quench

18 FNAL study conclusions 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF18 A model was developed linking the reduction in Q and the fringe field from the magnet based on an estimation of the size of the `normal opening’ during the quench A procedure for `annealing’ the quench zone trapped flux was developed by repeated quenching of the zone in the presence of no field – the `normal opening’ was created several times to release the trapped flux anneal

19 FNAL conclusions 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF19 A model is developed that can fit the results and can be extended to other geometries A quench can trap fringe field flux and reduce the Q – the negative effects can be reduced by repeated quenching in zero-field

20 ISAC-II perspective 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF20 In ISAC-II we chose a minimalist strategy – choose non magnetic materials where possible and use procedures to mitigate solenoid effects – no shielding between cavity and solenoid Must do a degaussing of the solenoid before any planned warm-up to erase magnet memory During cryogenic events (1-2 per year) of more than a few hours if cavities warm above transition then the solenoid is degaussed and then heated above transition to release frozen flux 30 min to degauss and 30 min to warm to 25K 60 min to cool everything down Cavities are insensitive to quench degradation since they have a reactor grade jacket which acts as a Meissner shield

21 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF21 Cavity #1Cavity #2Cavity #3Cavity #4 Day 3: Solenoid not hysteresis cycled – trapped flux gives large field near solenoid Cavity Q through warming cycles

22 FRIB experience 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF22 TDCM was constructed to study (among other things) the interaction of the solenoid with the cavities and environment Initial test showed too high background field resulting in reduced Q Tests will be conducted this month after recent improvements

23 TDCM-2 tests at FRIB Using magnetic sensors to estimate magnetization from solenoid K.Saito, 25 Sept 2010 Close to the Cavity A at High Magnetic area (0-2G) On the Magnetized SS bellows (0-20G) Close to the m metal surface (0-30kG) Close to the m metal surface (0-30kG), Slide 23 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF

24 Other issues 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF24 Alignment of solenoids Beam dynamics requirements set the specification of the alignment tolerance (0.2-0.5 mm) In general the alignment of the solenoid dominates that of the cavities in the alignment error budget How to handle for multi-solenoid modules Precise strongback with all solenoids aligned warm Individual alignment for each solenoid Alignment correction Many proposals are incorporating steering coils inside the solenoid For tuning you need one independent diagnostic for each element to be tuned A solution for multi-solenoid cryomodules is to use one cold BPM for each solenoid Development at FRIB and FNAL (among others) Performance is promising

25 Conclusion 11/5/2012 TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF25 Many new projects in progress or proposed will use superconducting solenoids in cryomodules Due to the interaction of residual and fringe fields with cavity performance it is important to pay attention during design and development – and to imagine mitigation strategies of potentially reduced Q during operation Alignment of solenoids in the cryomodule is an important technical issue Many common issues – people making or planning test facilities (ie TDCM) – TTC is an excellent forum to communicate the results to the community

26 Thanks 11/5/2012 26TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF


Download ppt "Bob Laxdal, SRF Department Head, TRIUMF Living with a High Field Solenoid in a Cryomodule 11/5/2012 1TTC - JLab - Bob Laxdal - TRIUMF."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google