Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 2 3 Chronology of FOI laws  Sweden1766  Colombia 1888  Finland1951  U.S.A1966  Denmark, Norway1970  France1978  Australia,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 2 3 Chronology of FOI laws  Sweden1766  Colombia 1888  Finland1951  U.S.A1966  Denmark, Norway1970  France1978  Australia,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 pkachare@gmail.com

2 2

3 3 Chronology of FOI laws  Sweden1766  Colombia 1888  Finland1951  U.S.A1966  Denmark, Norway1970  France1978  Australia, New Zealand 1982  Canada1983  So far, 97 countries have passed FOI laws. Global Historical Perspective

4 National Historical Perspective  Article 19(1)(a) of Constitution  Supreme Court Decisions  Struggle by Media  Struggle by Civil Society  First Task Force…..1996  FOI Act  State Acts  New RTI Law pkachare@gmail.com4

5 5 The Real ‘Swaraj’ will come not by the acquisition of authority by a few but by the acquisition of capacity by all to resist authority when abused. – Mahatma Gandhi pkachare@gmail.com

6 The Beginning…  WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved… solemnly resolved… …to secure to all its citizens LIBERTY of thought, expression… …adopt, enact and give to ourselves this Constitution – Preamble to the Constitution of India – Preamble to the Constitution of IndiaContd. pkachare@gmail.com 6

7 Preamble  An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 7pkachare@gmail.com

8  WHEREAS the Constitution of India has established democratic Republic;  AND WHEREAS democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed; 8pkachare@gmail.com

9  AND WHEREAS revelation of information in actual practice is likely to conflict with other public interests including efficient operations of the Governments, optimum use of limited fiscal resources and the preservation of confidentiality of sensitive information; 9pkachare@gmail.com

10  AND WHEREAS it is necessary to harmonise these conflicting interests while preserving the paramountcy of the democratic ideal;  NOW, THEREFORE, it is expedient to provide for furnishing certain information to citizens who desire to have it.  BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty- sixth Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 10pkachare@gmail.com

11 Objectives Practical Mechanism Informed Citizenry Transparency To contain corruption Accountability 11pkachare@gmail.com

12 Jeremy Cronin: Jeremy Cronin:  "Democracy is speaking truth to power, making power truthful, and truth powerful." 12pkachare@gmail.com

13 Information as resource  “Information is a source of learning. But unless it is organized, processed, and available to the right people in a format for decision making, it is a burden, not a benefit.”  William Pollard 13pkachare@gmail.com

14 14 PARADIGM SHIFT An act which will be implemented by the people and acted upon by the government pkachare@gmail.com

15 15  Fait accompli  Disclosure a rule and Secrecy an exception  Transparency means public interest  Public Interest overrides  It is a part of Global Process.  Governance will improve Basic Tenets pkachare@gmail.com

16 16 Important shift  RTI Act is a complete code in itself  Disclosure is a Rule and Denial is an exception  Citizen to implement and Govt. Instrumentality to obey.  To deny any information - Restrictions, conditions and prerequisites imposed and prescribed by law should be satisfied.

17 pkachare@gmail.com17

18 Chapter 1 Preliminary  Section Section  1. ‍ Short title, extent and commencement  2. Definitions 18pkachare@gmail.com

19 Important Concepts RTI Act based on 1. Transparency, 2. Accountability & 3. Containing Corruption Competent Authority Information Public Authority Record IC AA PIO APIO IC AA PIO APIO Right to Information Third Party Appropriate Government Containing Corruption TRANPERANCYTRANPERANCY ACCOUNTABLITYACCOUNTABLITY 19pkachare@gmail.com

20 Competent Authority Duties Rule Making Support to PAs Duties Rule Making Support to PAs Speaker LS & Speakers of LA Chairman Rajya Sabha/ LACs Chief Justice of SC /HCs Administr ator UTs President & Governors 20pkachare@gmail.com

21 21 Public Authority Body, Institution or Authority Established or constituted by Constitution of india Act of Parliament or State Legislature Order or notification of appropriate Govt. And also includes Body owned controlled or substantially financed by appropriate Govt. NGO substantially financed from funds provided by appropriate Govt. 3

22 “Information" (f)"information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, emails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and It includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force; It includes information relating to any private body which can be accessed by a public authority under any other law for the time being in force; 22pkachare@gmail.com

23 Information 2(j) held by or under the control of any public authority 2(j) Include information which the public authority is entitled to access under any other law from a private body. 23pkachare@gmail.com

24 “Right to Information" (j) "right to information" means the right to information accessible under this Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to— (i) inspection of work, documents, records; (ii) taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents or records; (iii) taking certified samples of material; (iv) obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device; 24pkachare@gmail.com

25 Form of information  The Act specifies that  citizens have a right to obtain information in form of printouts, diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes ‘or  in any other electronic mode’ or through printouts and  inspect documents, works and records.  Take samples. 25pkachare@gmail.com

26 INSPECTION OF WORK as implied in section 2 (j)(i) of RTI Act 2005  Inspection of work -  the act of inspecting or verifying a work,  or a check on work performance  or product quality made in accordance with the provisions of the RTI Act 2005 to view facts, ground reality or truth "spot checks may ensure a high level of performance " 26pkachare@gmail.com

27 Inspection  a formal or official examination  the act of examining something closely (as for mistakes, impropriety, irregularity, illegality and so on)  The act of inspecting.  Official examination or review;  a formal or official examination;  a formal systematic questioning ;  the work of inquiring into something thoroughly and systematically  a detailed critical inspection 27pkachare@gmail.com

28 Inspection  whether work/decition is within norms  whether there is irregularity  whether there is deception  whether substandard material /misleading is used  whether all Govt. norms are observed or not  whether models, trial pits etc, displayed or rules and procedures followed.s 28pkachare@gmail.com

29 Example 1  If one would like to know whether a particular structure is legal or illegal, there are say two ways to draft the query for seeking information on the same: One Way: Please inform me whether the structure XXXX is legal or illegal? (Question / answer format and as such in a way out of the ambit of RTI Act)  Another Way: Please provide me with a certified photocopy of the permission granted for structure XXXX. (Information sought in document (material /tangible) form and as such within the ambit of the RTI Act) 29pkachare@gmail.com

30 Example No. 1  Now suppose if the structure XXXX is illegal, then the PIO will have to respond saying that photocopy of the permission cannot be provided, because no permission has ever been granted for the structure XXXX, which means that the structure is illegal. Hence, both the queries seek the same information but the second one achieves the same purpose while at the same time remaining within the ambit of the RTI Act. 30pkachare@gmail.com

31 Drafting queries for seeking information is the most skillful part of drafting a RTI application.  RTI Act is for seeking information in material form (e.g. Documents, CDs, Sample of Material used etc.) in possession of a Public (Government) Authority.  RTI Act is not for asking questions to a Public Authority e.g. Is this correct? What you have done is fair or unfair? etc. 31pkachare@gmail.com

32 32 2 (n) "third party" means a person other than the citizen making a request for information and includes a public authority. Third party First Party Requester of information Second Party Requester of information Third Party Individual, NGO, Company, another Govt, Public Authority

33 “Record" (i) “Record" includes— (a) any document, manuscript and file; (b) any microfilm, microfiche and facsimile copy of a document; (c) any reproduction of image or images embodied in such microfilm (whether enlarged or not); and (d) any other material produced by a computer or any other device; 33pkachare@gmail.com

34 34pkachare@gmail.com

35 Incident of Scant respect for RTI Incident of Scant respect for RTI  A citizen was told that a VAO in Madurai district insisted people visiting him remove footwear before entering his room. I  Irked, by this, he sought a response through the Right to Information Act and wrote to the VAO and other officers up the ladder in the district and at the State level. 35pkachare@gmail.com

36 RTI querry by a Citizen  Is there any rule that visitors to government offices shall not wear footwear, but leave them outside the premises while meeting the bureaucrats. If so, is there any G.O to this effect…. These were a few questions raised by an RTI activist in Madurai. 36pkachare@gmail.com

37 Response by VAO & Tahasildar  The activist was told that a VAO in Madurai district insisted people visiting him remove footwear before entering his room. Irked, the activist sought a response through the Right to Information Act and wrote to the VAO and other officers up the ladder in the district and at the State level.  Swiftly, he got a response from the VAO concerned that there was no such rule or any Government Order. The jurisdiction Tahsildar also wrote back stating that there is no G.O. 37pkachare@gmail.com

38 Response by Collector & State  However, the Personal Assistant (General) to the Madurai District Collector replied in a typical government format.  “The Act clearly spelt out the steps on how information shall be obtained in 2 (f) of the RTI Act of 2005. Since, your query does not fit into it, the information you had asked for shall not be disseminated by this office…”  A State officer, attached with the Public Information Department in Chennai, had a similar response. 38pkachare@gmail.com

39 Citizen Perception  While appreciating the VAO and Tahsildar, the RTI activist, K. Hakeem, said that it is usually the lower-level officers who refuse information under RTI. In this case, the response from high offices shows scant respect to the RTI and info seeking public.  Source: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ta mil-nadu/scant-respect-for- rti/article7882140.ece http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ta mil-nadu/scant-respect-for- rti/article7882140.ece http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ta mil-nadu/scant-respect-for- rti/article7882140.ece  The Hindu dated 16/11/2015 39pkachare@gmail.com

40 Area serious of Concern  How to sensitize this mentality ? 40pkachare@gmail.com


Download ppt "1 2 3 Chronology of FOI laws  Sweden1766  Colombia 1888  Finland1951  U.S.A1966  Denmark, Norway1970  France1978  Australia,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google