3. The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

4. it The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

5. it that The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

6. it that in The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

7. it that in of The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

8. it that in of. The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

9. it that in of. as The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

10. it that in of. as or The 7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

11. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

15. The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

19. The Appendix does not include the transcripts.

20. It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

21. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:

24. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:

26. The provisions in Section 604 state:

29. The provisions state:

30. The provisions in Section 604 state:

32. Section 604 provides:

34. The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:

35. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides....

38. This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides....

40. This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides....

43. This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides....

45. This memorandum summarizes German trade law. The first part provides....

46. The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides....

47. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

50. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

53. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree:

54. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

55. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

58. Please let me know if you have any questions.

60. If you have any questions, please let me know.

62. Please let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification.

64. The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

65. PASSIVE VOICE The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

66. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

67. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

68. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

69. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

70. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

71. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

72. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

73. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

74. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

75. Google has a similar feature that allows chat histories to be saved by a user.

80. Google has a similar feature that allows a user to save chat histories.

82. Google has a similar feature that allows chat histories to be saved by a user.

83. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

84. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being NOMINALIZATIONS The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

85. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being NOMINALIZATIONS to be verbs The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

86. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being NOMINALIZATIONS to be verbs of The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

87. PASSIVE VOICE to be verbs am is was were are been be being NOMINALIZATIONS to be verbs of ion The 3 Signs for Spotting Dull Sentences

88. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

92. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.

94. I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

95. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

99. French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”

103. French law does not define “inventor.”

104. French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

105. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

110. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.

112. By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

114. Pursuant to Rule 26(B)(1), California has adopted a liberal philosophy concerning the scope of discovery. This general philosophy allows for a broad scope of discovery that encompasses any request that “appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

117. Pursuant to Rule 26(B)(1), California has adopted a liberal philosophy concerning the scope of discovery that encompasses any request that “appears reasonably calcu- lated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

122. Pursuant to Rule 26(B)(1), California has adopted a liberal philosophy that encom- passes any request that “appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

124. Pursuant to Rule 26(B)(1), California allows any request that “appears reasonably calcu- lated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

127. Under Rule 26(B)(1), California allows any request that “appears reasonably calcu- lated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

130. Rule 26(B)(1) allows any request that “appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

131. Pursuant to Rule 26(B)(1), California has adopted a liberal philosophy concerning the scope of discovery. This general philosophy allows for a broad scope of discovery that encompasses any request that “appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

133. A court would be unlikely to return a buyer’s earnest money with no evidence of actual harm caused by the amendment.

135. With no evidence of actual harm caused by the amendment, a court would be unlikely to return a buyer’s earnest money.

137. I love chocolate cake, but it’s fattening.

138. I love chocolate cake, but it’s fattening. It’s fattening, but I love chocolate cake.

140. To effect the rescission, a party must give notice of the rescission and return any consideration received under the contract.

145. To effect the rescission, a party must give notice and return any consideration received.

148. To rescind, a party must give notice and return any consideration received.

151. To rescind, a party must give notice and return any consideration.

152. To effect the rescission, a party must give notice of the rescission and return any consideration received under the contract.

154. As the retreat was beginning, I happened to get a letter in the mail from a friend of mine in America who is a wildlife filmmaker for National Geographic.

158. As the retreat was beginning, I happened to get a letter from a friend in America who is a wildlife filmmaker for National Geographic.

160. As the retreat was beginning, I got a letter from a friend in America who is a wildlife filmmaker for National Geographic.

164. As the retreat was beginning, I got a letter from a friend who is a wildlife filmmaker for National Geographic.

165. As the retreat was beginning, I happened to get a letter in the mail from a friend of mine in America who is a wildlife filmmaker for National Geographic.

167. In fact, the law in these cases indicates otherwise.

171. The law indicates otherwise.

173. The law states otherwise.

175. In fact, the law in these cases indicates otherwise.

176. This agreement shall be subject to termina- tion at the election of either party.

179. This agreement shall be [may terminate] [elect to] either party.

181. This agreement shall be [may elect to terminate] either party.

185. Either party may elect to terminate this agreement.

187. Either party may terminate this agreement.

188. This agreement shall be subject to termina- tion at the election of either party.

190. In fact, though his strength pervaded every action of his, it seemed but the advertise- ment of a greater strength that lurked within.

194. Though his strength pervaded every action, it seemed but the advertisement of a greater strength that lurked within.

197. Though his strength pervaded every action, it seemed but to advertise a greater strength that lurked within.

201. Though his strength pervaded every action, it seemed but to advertise an even greater strength lurking within.

203. In fact, though his strength pervaded every action of his, it seemed but the advertise- ment of a greater strength that lurked within.

205. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

221. This memorandum is being provided... our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

231. Our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

232. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

233. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à- vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

234. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à- vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

242. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

247. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

250. Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).

253. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

256. NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

258. This memorandum is being provided in connection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.