1. Fair Compromise in a Morally Complex World

2. Fair Compromise Resource Interpretation is not tied to ex ante determination of AAs; e.g. Apéritif. Assigned Amounts as Natural Resource = Grandfathering  GDP Growth  R% = Reduced Baseline Emission Intensity  Ex Post GDP Global GHG Cap Commit. Period Assigned Amount (Per Capita) =  Global GHG Cap Commit. Period Transfers are resource transfers not to be compared with develop. assistance

3. Fair Compromise 1995 population shares Per Capita China 21% India 16% LDCs 22% EU 7% USA 5% MENA 5% Economies in Transition 7% Rest of non-Annex I 10% Rest of Annex I 9% Annex I: 22% non-Annex I: 78% Grandfathering 1995 energy emission shares China 14% India 4% LDCs 6% EU 13% USA 21% MENA 6% Economies in Transition 17% Rest of non-Annex I 10% Rest of Annex I 9% Annex I: 61% non-Annex I: 39% Le Repas. Distributing a ‘Cake’ in a Morally Ambiguous Context

4. Fair Compromise A ‘Mixed’ Compromise Solution Ck =Ck = C k = Compromise share of Party k w GF GF k GF k = k’s Grandfathering share + w PC PC k PC k = k’s Per Capita share w GF + w PC = 1

5. Fair Compromise Social Preference Score Weightings I

6. Fair Compromise Social Preference Score Weightings II

7. Fair Compromise Per Capita Grandfathering Annex I: 31% non-Annex I: 69% China 20% India 13% LDCs 18% EU 8% USA 9% MENA 5% Economies in Transition 9% Rest of non-Annex I 10% Rest of Annex I 9% Non-Annex I: 78% Annex I: 22%Non-Annex I: 39% Annex I: 61% ¾¼ Preference Score

8. Fair Compromise PAF-Principle Polluter Pays Principle PP-Principle Digestif‘Back to the Present’ Polluter Acts First Principle PA-Principle Polluter Acts Principle