1. 2. The standards of textuality: cohesion

2. From the sentence to the text Traditional approach to the study of language: sentence as conventional object of study Structuralism (Bloofield, Harris, Chomsky): sentence as the largest unit with an inherent structure (cf. Bloomfield 1933: 170). Language samples were gathered and analysed according to systems of minimal units (phonemes, morphemes, syntagmemes…). Each system of minimal units constitutes a level organized by the opposition of units and their distinctive features, so that each unit was in some way distinct from all others. Whatever fell beyond the scope of the sentence was assigned to the domain of stylistics.

3. Meaning as a secondary aspect, because it includes extra-linguistic aspects Up to the 70s no established methodology that would apply to texts ‘“text linguistics” cannot be a designation for a single theory or method. Instead, it designates any work in language science devoted to the text as the primary object of inquiry’ De Beaugrande - Dressler

4. Historical roots Rhetoric: –training public orators –texts evaluated in terms of their effects upon the audience of receivers; –texts are vehicles of purposeful interaction. Stylistics –style results from the characteristic selection of options for producing a text. literary studies Anthropology –language as human activity; focus on meaning Sociology –analysis of conversation as a mode of social organization and interaction

5. Where TL comes from Rhetoric shares several concerns with text linguistics, notably the assumptions that: –(a) arranging of ideas is open to systematic control; –(b) the transition between ideas and expressions can be subjected to conscious training; –(c) among the various texts which express a given configuration of ideas, some are of higher quality than others; –(d) judgements of texts can be made in terms of their effects upon the audience of receivers; –(e) texts are vehicles of purposeful interaction.

6. Both Rhetoric and TL concerned with: “How are discoverable structures built through operations of decision and selection, and what are the implications of those operations for communicative interaction?” as opposed to “What structures can analysis uncover in a language?”, (traditional linguistic)

7. many aspects of texts only appear systematic in view of how texts are produced, presented, and received.

8. «When we move beyond the sentence boundary, we enter a domain characterized by greater freedom of selection or variation and lesser conformity with established rules. For instance, we can state that an English declarative sentence must contain at least a noun phrase and an agreeing verb phrase, as in that perennial favourite of linguists: The man hit the ball. But if we ask how that might fit into a text, e.g.: [a] The man hit the ball. The crowd cheered him on. [b] The man hit the ball. He was cheered on by the crowd. [c] The man hit the ball. The crowd cheered the promising rookie on. it is much harder to decide what expression for the ‘man’ should be used in a follow-up sentence (e.g. ‘him’ vs. ‘this promising rookie’), and in what format (e.g. active vs. passive).

9. TEXT An extended structure of syntactic units (Werlich 1983) A communicative occurrence (deBeaugrande-Dressler 1981) Any passage, spoken or written, of whatever length, that does form a unified whole. […] A text is a unit of language in use (Halliday-Hasan 1976) The concept of texture is entirely appropriate to express the property of 'being a text'. A text has texture and this is what distinguishes it from something that is not a text (deBeaugrande-Dressler 1981).

10. Standards of textuality For Werlich: coherence and completion (W 23-25) For De Beaugrande –Dressler: seven standards, which serve as constitutive principles of textual communication. Most important ones: cohesion and coherence. It is to be noted that the two elements of this conceptual distinction taken together correspond broadly to Werlich's coherence.

11. “A text will be defined as a communicative occurrence which meets seven standards of textuality..... (dB-D)

12. standards of textuality: cohesion coherence intentionality acceptability informativity situationality intertextuality.

13. From text linguistics to discourse analysis Text-internal criteria –Cohesion –Coherence Text-external criteria –Intentionality –Acceptability –Informativity –Situationality –Intertextuality Discourse analysis “pure” text linguistics

14. 1. Cohesion how the components of the surface text, i.e. the actual words we hear or see, are mutually connected within a sequence. The surface components depend upon each other according to grammatical forms and conventions, such that cohesion rests upon grammatical dependencies....

15. Cohesive elements in de Beaugrande-Dressler’s model (integrated with Halliday-Hasan’s model)  use of pro-forms/reference personal / demonstrative pronouns premodifiers (such)  grammar dependency network, at phrase, clause and sentence level morphology tense/aspect comparative reference text conjunctives (inter-sentence); paratactic conjunctives; hypotactic conjunctives  ellipsis  substitution Lexical and textual cohesion  recurrence  partial recurrence  Parallelism  Paraphrase  collocation  hyponymy / meronimy  synonymy / antonimy  functional sentence perspective  information structure  focus - thematic structure  intonation

16. 2. Coherence concerns the ways in which the components of the textual world, i.e. the configuration of concepts and relations which underlie the surface text are mutually accessible and relevant....

17. Cohesion and coherence cohesion = connectivity of the surface coherence = connectivity of underlying content

18. When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, [...That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government. […] experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.