1. Vision Process Periodic Review based on changes in any decision factors (technology, health effects, land use) On-going Dialogue about how to make site an asset to the community Continued discussion to build consensus on end use

2. Vision Process Bring everyone to the table at the site level Develop consensus about End Use Vision Identify the “show stoppers” and take them off the menu –Does the timing make sense? –Does it have community acceptance? –Does it pass a subjective Cost-Benefit check? –Does it pass a regulatory gut check? –Does it open Pandora’s box / unravel the fabric? –Does it have political support?

3. Vision Process Identify places where risks aren’t addressed or can be addressed better Things that can be handled within existing regulatory framework MOVE AHEAD Things that require a fundamental change in approach APPLY CRITERIA AND/OR COMMENCE A NATIONAL DIALOGUE w/STAKEHOLDERS

4. CRITERIA Benefits/Value Added Opportunity to Enhance Cleanup Timing / Where the process stands Tribal Treaty Rights/ Risk Assessment Sustainability & LR Mgmt Goals Robust LT Stewardship Consistency Stability of site’s future mission Compliance with “spirit of the law” in addition to the law Reliance on regulatory policy Technology readiness Consideration of Trade-offs to enhance the overall end state Does end state support the end use? Environmental Justice Impacts Worker Impacts ST Vs LT Risk Security of Transportation Practicality Financial Strategy / Plan that supports the cleanup in the ST & LT Site Landuse/ Exposure Point of Compliance/Groundwater Holistic Approach

5. Things that Need Clarification What is joint understanding of Stewardship/sustainability Understanding what DOE s going to do to secure LT sustainability Definition of Risk