1. 2016 ANNUAL WORKSHOP Promotion & Tenure and Continuing Status April 12, 2016, Saguaro Hall 101, 8:00-9:30 AM For further information, visit http://facultyaffairs.arizona.edu/promotion 1

2. Agenda  Introductions  Preparing for Promotion Reviews  The Promotion Review Process  The Promotion Dossier  Peer Reviews of Teaching  Student Evaluations of Teaching  Continuing-Status Reviews Promotion Resources Handout 2

3. Cynthia White, Co-Chair, P&T Committee Kitt Farrell-Poe, Chair, Continuing-Status Com. Thomas Miller, Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs Ingrid Novodvorsky, Director, Teaching, Learning & Assessment, Office of Instruction and Assessment Rebecca Pérez, Asst. Director, Instructional Data, OIA 3 Introductions

4. Department Heads Should Use annual reviews to help candidates set goals. Help candidates prioritize service commitments. Help limit new teaching preparations and align teaching and research interests. Specify criteria and expectations. Be precise on areas needing improvement. Help candidates articulate their goals and needs. Keep good records. The Promotion Process Starts Where the Hiring Process Ends 4

5. Candidates Should Review and discuss promotion criteria. Share your writing with colleagues. Talk to senior faculty about how they assess impact, national standing, and quality. Keep an eye out for external reviewers. Use annual reviews to Discuss your program of work, Set limits and priorities, and Solicit frank assessments. Solicit peer review / classroom observations 5

6. Requesting Delays in Reviews Submit requests at least one semester before the review. 1. Birth or Adoption 2. Personal Reasons such personal health or family and partner care 3. Adverse Professional Circumstances that are beyond a candidate’s control 4. Prestigious External Commitments that take time away from research 6

7. The Promotion Review Process University P&T Committee Co-chair Cynthia White 7

8. The Promotion Review Process  External Reviews  Department Committee/Department Head  College Committee/College Dean  University Committee/Provost Dossiers are due in the Provost’s Office January 15, 2016

9. Protect the Process to Ensure Fair Reviews Follow the Guide to the Promotion Process. Consult with your dean or the Provost’s Office on procedural variations or questions. Base decisions on department and college criteria. Make sure formats are followed. External and internal reviewers cannot be collaborators. Use Collaborator Letters from those who are not. Have committee members sign and date letters. Explain votes, recusals and abstentions. 9

10. Selecting External Reviewers Solicited by the Department Head or the Committee Chair—if they are not collaborators External Reviewers MUST be independent and at the rank the candidate is being promoted to. Only head or committee chair should contact reviewers. No more than half can come from candidate’s list. Document the selection process. Use the standard template for requesting letters. Include all solicited letters. Put external reviews before collaborator letters. Submit brief bios of external reviewers, not CVs. 10

11. 1.Summary Data Sheet 2.Candidate’s Workload Assignment 3.Departmental and College Criteria (not full guide) 4.Curriculum Vitae and List of Collaborators 5.Candidate Statement 6.Teaching Portfolio 7.Evaluation of Teaching: Separate letter on teaching required. 8.Service and Outreach Portfolio (Optional in P&T Reviews) 9.Membership in Graduate Interdisciplinary Programs Documentation for Interdisciplinary Candidates 10.Letters from Outside Evaluators and Collaborators 11.Recommendations from Internal Reviewers The Promotion Dossier Refer to the Guide for tips on preparing dossiersGuide 11

12. Section 2: Workload Assignment Use percentages and define meaning –40% teaching, which means... –40% research, which means... –20% service, which means... Describe duties, do not praise achievements. Use the template provided in the dossier.template provided in the dossier Electronic signatures are acceptable. Prepared by the Department Head The Workload Assignment should be kept current and accurate 12

13. Sections 4 & 5: Documenting and Discussing Your Achievements Follow the required CV format exactly. Get models for CVs and Candidate Statements. Keep records of service and teaching contributions. Use the Candidate Statement to  Characterize your research and teaching goals, methods, and results;  Connect with teaching and service dossiers; and  Thereby demonstrate the impact of your work. 13

14. Goals:  Guiding Principles  Learning  Motivation  Interpersonal dynamics Methods:  Curricular design  Modes of instruction  Context  Management Using Your Candidate Statement to Represent Your Teaching What do you teach, and how do you organize it? How do you help students learn it? How do you assess their progress? Assessment and Impact:  In-class student feedback  Peer assessments  TCE reports  Letters from students  Broader contributions 14

15. Section 6: The Teaching Portfolio The Candidate Statement sets up the Portfolio. Instructional materials stay in the department. List all courses taught in period in rank. List the funded and pending awards and grants. Document advising and mentoring. Describe development activities. Provide your committee with full TCE forms, student comments, and the TCE summary sheet. Only the TCE summary goes forward. 15

16. Section 7: Evaluating Teaching & Advising A peer review letter on teaching is required in addition to the general department letter: Assess instructional materials. Include observation of teaching. Review student assessments of teaching. Discuss other instructional contributions. Consult Peer Review of Teaching Protocol, which is available at http://oia.arizona.edu and now supports departmental templates.Peer Review of Teaching Protocolhttp://oia.arizona.edu Summarize TCE reports and obtain independent student comments. Summary sheet for TCEs goes forward with dossier. 16

17. TCE Consultation & Support Services Assistance to faculty accessing & interpreting TCEs. Consultation with heads or committees on Using ratings in annual and performance reviews and Revising TCEs to assess curricula and student support. Contact: Rebecca Pérez, Assistant Director, Instructional Data Office of Instruction and Assessment rperez@email.arizona.edu and 520-626-0536 rperez@email.arizona.edu 17

18. What Do TCEs Measure? Student experiences, perceptions, feelings, self-reflections on their effort and learning, self assessment on performance and expected grade, self efficacy, etc. TCEs can measure students’ perceptions of instructor and course effectiveness in support of their program completion and perceived learning. What Do TCEs NOT Measure? Student learning and grades

19. 8: Service and Outreach Portfolio This section is an option for P&T candidates, but all candidates should discuss the impact of their service. This section is required for continuing status reviews that include educational outreach. In P&T reviews, these materials remain in departments. Consult our Inclusive View of Scholarship ResourcesInclusive View of Scholarship Resources What to Include?  Technical reports, research studies, and presentations  Articles for popular publications and instructional materials, What to include in the dossier to document impact?  Letters from community collaborators noting impact  Letters from university collaborators noting rigor and innovation  News reports on service contributions  Adoptions of programs and materials by other institutions 19

20. Additions to Dossiers? Up to February 1, additions may be made (for example, a major grant or publication). However, the addition must be requested by an administrator or committee chair. Additions require re-review at earlier levels. Candidate must be informed. Candidate must be given chance to respond if the information is negative (such as poor teaching evaluations). 20

21. The Provost’s decision may be appealed, as detailed in UHAP 3.3.02.e and UHAP 4A.3.02. Appeals to the President must be made in writing within 30 days of the Provost’s decision. Access to redacted dossier is provided following the Provost’s Office protocol. Appeals of Promotion Decisions The President’s decision is final, except in cases of discrimination or unconstitutional violations of due process. 21

22. Continuing Status Reviews University Continuing Status Committee Chair Kitt Farrell-Poe 22

23. Distinctive Aspects of Continuing-Status Reviews CS duties may not fit neatly into the categories of teaching, research & service. Thus, the job description and allocation of time are even more important. Work with your supervisor to align your duties with your unit’s guidelines for promotion, and Make sure to document your contributions to publications and grants. Finally, develop an assessment plan to demonstrate the impact of your activities. 23

24. Your Job Description Sets Your Baseline Explain your contributions in non-technical terms Include all job descriptions and note changes. Often job descriptions include statements of duties that are used to assess position effectiveness. Duties should be divided into four categories:  Research/Scholarship/Creative Activity,  Outreach/Service,  Teaching/Educational Outreach,  Program Development can be used to include administrative activities that may not otherwise be evaluated for CS&P. 24

25. Workload areasCALS CuratorLibrarianResearcher Research/scholarly/ creative activity 30%10%40%10%65% Classroom teaching25% Outreach education / extension 50%70%30% Program Development 20% 80% Service10% Specify your Duties Accurately 25 If you list Other Activities, list and specify the duties

26. Document Your Impact Use the Candidate Statement and Service/Outreach Portfolio to discuss how your work affects others. Specify what external reviewers need to understand. Enlist outside reviewers who do related work. Provide the brief bios to your head or committee chair. Describe your relationship to them. Discuss soliciting collaborator letters to document the impacts of your work. 26