Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLambert Blake Modified over 8 years ago
1
Key ingredients in global hydrological response to external forcing Response to warming => Increased horizontal moisture fluxes => Poleward expansion of the subtropics Response to differential warming of the 2 hemispheres => tropical rainbelts move to warmer hemisphere
2
White areas => less than two thirds of the models agree on the sign of the change Percentage change in precipitation by end of 21st century: PCMDI-AR4 archive
3
PCMDI/IPCC % increase in midlatitude maximum in poleward flux of vapor vs global mean temperature
4
Precipitation and evaporation “Aqua_planet” climate model (no seasons, no land surface) Instantaneous precip (lat,lon) Time means
5
One can see effects of poleward shift of midlatitude circulation And increase(!) in strength of Hadley cell
6
Equilibrium 2x 21st century A1B 20th century
7
r 2 =0.72 r 2 =0.85
8
Sarah Kang, Princeton Model A: Frierson et al 2006 -- idealized moist GCM (no clouds -- water water vapor feedback) Model B: AM2 Aqua planet/slab ocean
9
Idealized GCM with different convection schemes
10
A parameter in the convection scheme is varied continuously in each model Idealized GCM: Modified Betts-Miller relative humidity to which one relaxes when convecting AM2: Relaxed Arakawa Schubert minimum allowed entrainment rate
11
Compensation at equator AM2 Idealized GCM
12
AM2 IGCM AM2 IGCM
13
AM2 IGCM
14
For the idealized GCM: A simple energy balance model with diffusion of moist static energy, fitting the diffusivity to the symmetric control, predicts compensation of 20-30% The tropical precipitation response is determined by 1)The degree of compensation 2)The gross moist stability Increasing RH decreases gross moist stability but not compensation
15
Solid: idealized GCM precip response at 7S Dashed: fit assuming degree of compensation and gross moist stability Increasing RH
16
Fraction of rain in ITCZ that falls as “large-scale” precip in AM2
17
Compensation at equator Latitude of precip max => Interesting benchmark for GCMs
18
In AM2 Degree of compensation strongly dependent on Entrainment limiter Why? Cloud feedback and water vapor feedback
20
Single realization of CM2 (greenhouse gases; aerosols, solar, volcanoes, land use)
21
Mean of 8-member ensemble
22
Range of SRES scenarios
23
Sahel summer rain: (1980-2000) minus (1960-1940) (mm/month) 8 member ensemble
24
Observed annual mean precipitation trend 1950-2000 Simulated annual mean precipitation trend in CM2 1950-2000
25
+2K SST perturbation: annual mean precip GFDL CM2 NCAR CCSM
26
QUMP: 129 different mixed layer models (courtesy of Matthew Collins, Hadley Center) % Sahel precip response to 2xCO2 CM2.0
27
NA Ind Regress: P(%) = I * Ind + N * NA = U * Ind + N * (NA – Ind) ( U = I – N ) Ind => Stabilization of troposphere? NA => ITCZ displacement? Moisture supply?
28
Regressing observed rainfall vs observed Ind and NA => P = - 0.12 Ind + 0.38 (NA - Ind)
29
1954 1940 1975 1985 1919 Observed evolution of Ind and NA - Ind, 11yr running means
31
SW override experiments (Jian Lu) Want to study how change in absorbed SW at surface affects precip But: take two realizations of same model and override absorbed SW of one with the absorbed SW from the other => big difference So: change in precip dP due to 2K increase in SST = dP due to change in SST with fixed uncorrelated SW (small) +dP due to change in uncorrelated SW (wrong sign) +dP due to difference in effects of correlation at different SSTs
32
+ Decorrelation at 2K - Decorrelation in cntrl + d(uncorr SW); fixed SST + dSST; fixed uncorr SW
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.