Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAndrea Sims Modified over 8 years ago
1
Dave Adamson
2
2009 Design Network launched 2 years ago Had many good ideas Discipline tracks Activity ownership Milestone meetings Promised “Not Static” Based on project teams feedback, Network need further refinement Dave Adamson
3
Established December 2009 Formalize Delivery Network change process Mission Statement: To Solicit, initiate, advocate, review, prioritize and approve changes to all delivery networks Dave Adamson
4
Paul Egbert – R1 Design Nathan Peterson – R1 PM Dave Schwartz – R2 Preconstruction Matt Zundel – R2 PM Patrick Cowley – R2 Design & QC/QA Brent Schvaneveldt – R3 Preconstruction Bill Townsend – R3 Design Jared Dastrup – R4 Design Daryl Friant – R4 PM Carmen Swanwick – Central Structures Jesse Sweeten – Central Preconstruction Craig Hancock – Central ePM Lori Dabling – Central PM Dave Adamson – Central PM Neil Sharp – Consultant Support Staff (Stanley) Dave Adamson
5
Develop network framework Stages & Milestones Meetings (Major Team) Scoping > Geometry > Plan in Hand > PS&E > Advertising ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ Kickoff Geometry Plan in PS&E Comment Scoping Hand Resolution
6
Then put “meat” on framework Worked with Disciplines Developed Deliverables Attached Deliverables to Activities Fit Activities into Stages Dave Adamson Bottom Up Construction Deliverable 1 Deliverable 2 Deliverable 3 Deliverable 4 Activity 1 Activity 2 Scoping Stage Activity 3
7
Just a Template or Guide Not a true “Dependency Diagram” Documentation details deliverable distribution Best described as a “Work Flow” process Dave Adamson
8
Can skip meetings and/or activities Needs of project come first Warning – understand consequences Key deliverables and QC/QA Network flexibility Just because the network shows that you can start an activity doesn’t mean that you should ROW can start just after Scoping Dave Adamson
9
Fewer network activities! (from 156 to 98) QC/QA (Explained later) Milestones (separate from meetings) Comment Resolution Meeting Design Leader Track Additional discipline tracks ROW parcel submittals tracking Individual structure tracking Dave Adamson
10
Back Separate from Stage Meeting PM designates Milestone completion after: Completion of all stage activities Resolution of issues from “end of stage” meeting Planned and Actual milestone dates will be tracked and reported Dave Adamson
11
Back Dave Adamson
12
Back The Design Leader is primarily responsible for all technical coordination and communication necessary to compile the project Plans, Specifications, & Estimate All other management duties and coordination default to the Project Manager unless assigned to the Design Leader through negotiation with the Project Manager Dave Adamson
13
Back 1 st Submittal 2 nd Submittal 3 rd Submittal 4 th Submittal Dave Adamson
14
Back 10 Bridge Activities 4SA….4SJ 10 Minor Structure Activities 4SM….4SV Dave Adamson
15
Network Diagram fits on one page Activity quick-link Table Deliverables lists for each activity Task lists for each deliverable Customizable Network Diagram Activity Numbering system Dave
20
For example - for activity 3G2. “3” - Indicates the activity is to be completed before Plan-in-Hand Stage meeting “G” - Identifies it as Geotechnical discipline track “2” - Is the activity identifier within the stage and discipline track. Some Structures and ROW activities vary from numbering system due to multiple tracks and ePM system constraints Dave
21
Scoping Geometry Plan-in-Hand Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) Advertising Brent & Bill
22
Project Setup Team selected and organized Review existing information ID additional required information Determine Project Scope, Schedule and Budget Determine the design effort and a strategy Negotiate and Set resource budget and schedule Brent & Bill
23
Develop initial roadway model. Recommended Horizontal and Vertical alignments. Identify preliminary cut/fill lines and initial ROW impacts Disciplines: Coordinate to identify potential impacts. Develop preliminary designs and conduct testing. Compile cost estimates. Environmental identifies resources and conducts research. May begin ROW (if appropriate) Brent & Bill
24
Roadway model is finalized Environmental Categorical Exclusion Document is written and approved Permitting process is started ROW design, appraisals and acquisition in progress Utility Design completed Agreements initiated Disciplines Finalize designs Update Estimates Develop preliminary plan sheets Brent & Bill
25
Design Detail plan sheets developed and finalized Final plans produced Project documents finalized Reports Special provisions Cost estimates Summary sheets, etc. ROW acquisition Complete (in a perfect world) Utilities Agreements complete Plans and documents complete Brent & Bill
26
PS&E revisions completed Comment Resolution meeting Project advertisement package is compiled Certifications & Permits Storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) Structures Acceptance ROW Certification Traffic & Safety Certification Utility Certification Environmental Permits Brent & Bill
27
Questions Documentation is found at: www.udot.utah.gov/go/pdn Dave Adamson
28
QC Policy QC/QA Procedure Project Delivery Network QC Checklists UDOT QC Audits
30
Each Deliverable is Checked or Reviewed BEFORE distribution Color Code / Check Print Stamps Documentation - Cover Sheets/Certification QC Checklists Project QA Audits Alternate QC/QA Procedures Form
31
4 Categories of QC Checks Design Calculations Computer Program Input Drawings Project Documents Independent Technical Review Review Comment Resolution Form QA Audits
33
Example: Sample Calculation QC Review
34
Cover Sheets Certification
35
Review Comment Resolution Form Each discipline responsible for their comments Initial Disposition – After all comments compiled, provide initial disposition (response) before end of stage. Final Disposition – After comments are incorporated or further evaluation completed. Distributed with next review package. Verify comment resolutions completed before final disposition distribution.
36
Project QA Audit The QA Reviewer verifies the QC documentation is complete. Performed before each Milestone Meeting Submit QA Audit Form
38
Questions Documentation is found at: www.udot.utah.gov/go/qcqa Dave Adamson
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.