Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySheila Kelly Modified over 8 years ago
1
Tornado Events Associated With Supercells and Quasi- linear Convective Systems Sara Jupin EAS4480 4/28/2011 Sara Jupin EAS4480 4/28/2011
2
Introduction Supercell: thunderstorm characterized by the presence of a mesocyclone. Quasi-linear Convective System (QLCS): line of thunderstorms that form along or ahead of a cold front. Both can produce tornadoes, however Supercell tornadoes are the most common, and often the most dangerous. Issuing warnings for QLCS tornodoes is more problematic. Don’t have the strong precursor signatures seen with SC tornadoes. Objective: Compare data between SC and QLCS data in order to increase future knowledge of QLCS tornadoes. Supercell: thunderstorm characterized by the presence of a mesocyclone. Quasi-linear Convective System (QLCS): line of thunderstorms that form along or ahead of a cold front. Both can produce tornadoes, however Supercell tornadoes are the most common, and often the most dangerous. Issuing warnings for QLCS tornodoes is more problematic. Don’t have the strong precursor signatures seen with SC tornadoes. Objective: Compare data between SC and QLCS data in order to increase future knowledge of QLCS tornadoes.
3
Methodology GA, AL, TN, MS tornado events from 11/15/2007-4/25/2010. Probability of detection for QLCS vs. SC tornado events. T-test and F-test to determine if effects of SC vs. QLCS tornadoes are statistically significant. Magnitude, Deaths, Injuries, Property Damage(K), Path Length(Miles), Path Width(Yards), and Lead Time (Hours). Determine any correlations between factors for each type of event. GA, AL, TN, MS tornado events from 11/15/2007-4/25/2010. Probability of detection for QLCS vs. SC tornado events. T-test and F-test to determine if effects of SC vs. QLCS tornadoes are statistically significant. Magnitude, Deaths, Injuries, Property Damage(K), Path Length(Miles), Path Width(Yards), and Lead Time (Hours). Determine any correlations between factors for each type of event.
4
Background Info Supercells 65 events (71%) 59 warned, 6 unwarned POD: 0.91 Deaths: 0.82 Injuries: 7.08 Damage Cost: 16,521 Path Length: 15.38 Path Width: 588.23 Lead Time: 3:05 Supercells 65 events (71%) 59 warned, 6 unwarned POD: 0.91 Deaths: 0.82 Injuries: 7.08 Damage Cost: 16,521 Path Length: 15.38 Path Width: 588.23 Lead Time: 3:05 QLCS’s 26 events (29%) 21 warned, 5 unwarned POD: 0.81 Deaths: 0.23 Injuries: 1.88 Damage Cost: 1,975 Path Length: 8.11 Path Width: 326.35 Lead Time: 3:11 QLCS’s 26 events (29%) 21 warned, 5 unwarned POD: 0.81 Deaths: 0.23 Injuries: 1.88 Damage Cost: 1,975 Path Length: 8.11 Path Width: 326.35 Lead Time: 3:11 91 Total Events
5
Student’s T-test Results Null hypothesis: means of the two distributions are identical
6
F-Test Results Null hypothesis: variances of the two distributions are identical
7
Correlation Results
8
Conclusions SC vs. QLCS results were not statistically significant at 5% convidence interval. Majority of the data did not have identical means or variances. Not enough evidence in the correlations to suggest a difference between SC vs. QLCS causality. Tornadoes from SC and QLCS have different results. Therefore, need to research how atmospheric conditions are different between the two. Very long and tedious task. SC vs. QLCS results were not statistically significant at 5% convidence interval. Majority of the data did not have identical means or variances. Not enough evidence in the correlations to suggest a difference between SC vs. QLCS causality. Tornadoes from SC and QLCS have different results. Therefore, need to research how atmospheric conditions are different between the two. Very long and tedious task.
9
Sources NWS verification website MATLAB NWS verification website MATLAB
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.