1. CAEP Standard 4: Program Impact Emerson Elliott, CAEP Dana Leon-Guerrero, CAEP CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdates@CAEPupdates Dra. Canny Bellido, Coordinadora CAEP-UPRM Capacitación CAEP UPRM Rincón PR, Mayo 28, 2014 Dra. Canny Bellido, Coordinadora CAEP-UPRM Capacitación CAEP UPRM Rincón PR, Mayo 28, 2014

2. Overview of Standard 4 4.1 Impact on P-12 Student Learning and Development 4.24.2Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness 4.34.3SatisfactionofEmployers 4.44.4SatisfactionSatisfactionofofCompleters Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Standard 4: Program Impact

3. Phase-in Strategy Facing challenges and seizing opportunities Transition Period (2014 & 2015 visits)- Present plans (self- study) and progress toward implementation (annual report) Two years post-standards required (2016 & 2017 visits) - Present plans and evidence of implementation (self-study) Two years post-standards required (2016 & 2017 visits) - Present plans and evidence of implementation (self-study) Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Standard 4: Program Impact

4. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates The provider demonstrates the impact of its completers on P-12 student learning and development, classroom instruction, and schools, and the satisfaction of its completers with the relevance and effectiveness of their preparation.

5. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates The provider documents, using multiple measures, that program completers contribute to an expected level of student-learning growth. Multiple measures shall include all available growth measures (including value-added measures, student- growth percentiles, and student learning and development objectives) required by the state for its teachers and available to educator preparation providers, other state-supported P-12 impact measures, and any other measures employed by the provider. Standard 4: Program Impact 4.1 Impact on P-12 Student Learning and Development

6. Question Are completers contributing P-12 student learning? totoanan expectedlevelofof Evidence State teacher evaluations Provider studies Pre-service progress and exit, including “Teachers of Record” Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates SESSION Value-Added Measures Friday 3-4pm Standard 4: Program Impact 4.1 Impact on P-12 Student Learning and Development

8. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates The provider demonstrates, through structured and validated observation instruments and student surveys, that completers effectively apply the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions that the preparation experiences were designed to achieve. Standard 4: Program Impact 4.2 Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness

9. 4.2 Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness Question Are completers applying dispositions effectively? knowledge,skills,andand Evidence Structured observations – Validated instrument – Trained reviewers (including external to the EPP) Student surveys Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates SESSION Reliability and Validity Friday 3-4pm Standard 4: Program Impact 4.2 Indicators of Teaching Effectiveness

10. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Standard 4: Program Impact 4.3 Satisfaction of Employers The provider demonstrates, using measures that result in valid and reliable data and including employment milestones such as promotion and retention, that employers are satisfied with the completers’ preparation for their assigned responsibilities in working with P-12 students

11. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation Question Are employers satisfied with completers' preparation? Are employers retaining and promoting completers? Evidence M easures that result in valid and reliable data Data on employment milestones, such as promotion and retention CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates SESSION Reliability and Validity Friday 3-4pm Standard 4: Program Impact 4.3 Satisfaction of Employers

12. Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates Standard 4: Program Impact 4.4 Satisfaction of Completers The provider demonstrates, using measures that result in valid and reliable data, that program completers perceive their preparation as relevant to their responsibilities they confront on the job, and that the preparation was effective

13. Questions Do completers think their preparation effective? isisrelevantrelevantandand What specific aspects of their preparation? Evidence M easures that result in valid and reliable data Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation CONNECT WI TH CAEP | w w w.CAEPnet.org | Tw itter: @CAEPupdatesw w w.CAEPnet.org |@CAEPupdates SESSION Reliability and Validity Friday 3-4pm Standard 4: Program Impact 4.4 Satisfaction of Completers