Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation."— Presentation transcript:

1 Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation @mattmcspirit VIR312

2 Compete to Win I - Core VirtualizationII - Private Cloud Private Cloud Choices Private Cloud Comparisons On Demand

3 Plus with Private Cloud… It’s cloud, dedicated to you Pooled ResourcesSelf-ServiceElasticUsage Based ControlCustomizable

4 Hypervisor VM Management Automation Service Mgmt. Self-Service Monitoring vSphere Hypervisor vCenter vFabric Application Director vCenter Orchestrator VMware Service Manager vCloud Director vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Hyper-V Virtual Machine Manager Orchestrator Service Manager App Controller Operations Manager ProtectionData Recovery 2.0Data Protection Manager

5 Hypervisor VM Management Automation Service Mgmt. Self-Service Monitoring vSphere Hypervisor vCenter vFabric Application Director vCenter Orchestrator VMware Service Manager vCloud Director vCenter Ops Mgmt. Suite vFabric App Perf Mgr, vFabric Hyperic Hyper-V Virtual Machine Manager Orchestrator Service Manager App Controller Operations Manager ProtectionData Recovery 2.0Data Protection Manager System Center 2012

6 All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

7 Comparison Focus All about the App

8 Constructing, Delivering & Consuming Apps Maintaining, Managing & Monitoring Apps Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

9 demo Agile Service Delivery

10 Standardized VM Templates Roles & Features Application Layers VM Templates 2.0: Service Templates Deployment into clouds Role-based Self Service Controlled Consumption Construction, Delivery & Consumption

11 Application Construction, Delivery & Consumption CapabilityMicrosoftVMware Request Private Cloud Resources YesUnproven 1 Role-Based Self-Service YesYes 2 Standardized Templates YesYes 3 Template Granularity: Roles / Features YesNo Template Granularity: Application Layer YesYes 4 Service/Multi-Tier Templates YesYes 4 Deployment Across Heterogeneous Clouds YesNo 1.VMware vCloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service Manager 2.Requires vCloud Director, available at additional cost 3.Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options. 4.Whilst VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, vFabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vfabric/VMware- vFabric-Application-Director-Datasheet.pdfhttp://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vfabric/VMware- vFabric-Application-Director-Datasheet.pdf

12 demo Reducing Time to Resolution

13 Centralized Maintenance Extends beyond the private cloud Integrated Service Management Powerful, relevant automation Deep application insight Connecting Dev-Ops Maintenance, Management & Monitoring

14 1.VMware, with Update Manager, can patch ESXi Hosts, and with the vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus, can manage physical hosts, and guest OS’s from a patching perspective. Customers would require VMware Hyperic to perform any kind of monitoring of the physical infrastructure. Both of these additional products are licensed per VM and come at considerable expense. 2.Would require vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus and VMware Hyperic to manage any physical systems. 3.vCloud Request Manager deprecated with customers encouraged to upgrade to the unproven VMware Service Manager, with no guarantees of integration with other vCenter Management Components. 4.VMware's vCenter Orchestrator has a limited set of plug-ins, of which the vast majority are VMware centric. No mention of plug-ins for other enterprise management systems and tools such as those from HP, IBM, BMC etc. 5.VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. vCenter Operations will monitor hosts, vFabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. vFabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications 6.Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to vCloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE. VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric- hyperic/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/service-manager/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/labmanager/overview.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric- hyperic/overview.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/service-manager/overview.html http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/labmanager/overview.html Application Maintenance, Management & Monitoring CapabilityMicrosoftVMware Centralized Patching & Maintenance YesYes 1 Non-Virtualized Infrastructure Management YesYes 2 Integrated Service Management YesUnproven 3 Heterogeneous Automation YesVMware Centric 4 Deep Application Insight YesMultiple Tools 5 Integrated Dev-Ops YesNo 6

15 Granular Workload Protection Physical or Virtual Generic Data Source Protection Centralized, Role- Based Management Backup to Tape Low-Cost Disaster Recovery Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

16 1.VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection for the workloads within the virtual machine, simply focusing on the VM itself as the protection unit and offers no protection of physical machines 2.VMware Data Recovery 2.0 is not extensible by 3 rd parties 3.VMware Data Recovery 2.0 appliances are unaware of one another, leading to potentially duplicated backups, or missed backups. 4.VMware Data Recovery 2.0 offers no protection to tape media. Disk only 5.VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager provides a solution for disaster recovery, it comes at significant additional cost, which rises for each VM that is protected. VMware Information: http://www.vmware.com/products/data-recovery/overview.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/site-recovery-manager/features.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/data-recovery/overview.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/site-recovery-manager/features.html Protection of Key Applications & Workloads CapabilityMicrosoftVMware Granular Workload Protection YesNo 1 Physical & Virtual Protection YesNo 1 3 rd Party Integration YesNo 2 Centralized Role-Based Management YesNo 3 Tape Backup YesNo 4 Low Cost Disaster Recovery YesNo 5

17 Comparison Focus Cross Platform from the metal up

18 Fabric Hypervisor OS Management Application Frameworks

19 demo Heterogeneous Management

20 1.VMware vCenter manages VMware ESX and ESXi only. Would require additional 3 rd party technologies to manage alternative hypervisors. 2.VMware do not produce any operating systems, and support is therefore focused not on the guest operating system itself, but instead, on the VM Tools and hardware. 3.A number of enterprise management tools integrate with vCenter, however VMware’s management tools, and orchestration tools lack broad interoperability with other systems. 4.vFabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from other management tools, and only vFabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense. VMware Information: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/home.html, http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter- orchestrator/plugins.html,http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/plugins.html. http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/home.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter- orchestrator/plugins.html,http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/plugins.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/ Cross-Platform Infrastructure Management CapabilityMicrosoftVMware Multi-Hypervisor Management YesNo 1 Comprehensive Guest OS Support YesYes 2 3 rd Party Management Integration YesLimited 3 Multiple Application Frameworks YesSpring 4

21 Comparison Focus Foundation for the Future

22

23 Scalability, Performance & Density Security & Multitenancy Flexible Infrastructure High Availability & Resiliency Host: 320 LP | 4TB Host: 1024 VMs VM: 64 vCPU | 1TB VM: 64TB VHDX Cluster: 64 | 4000 Virtual Fiber Channel 4K Disk Support ODX QoS Extensible Switch: PVLANS ARP/ND Spoofing DHCP Guard Monitoring Mirroring DVMQ | SR-IOV IPsec Task Offload BitLocker Live Migration Storage Migration Shared-Nothing LM Network Virtualization Incremental Backup Hyper-V Replica NIC Teaming Cluster: 64 | 4000 Secure Clustered Storage Enhanced CSV 3 Level Availability Priority & Affinity Hyper-V: A More Complete Virtualization Platform

24 Comparison Focus Cloud on your terms

25 Microsof t Private Cloud System Center 2012 Microsof t Public Cloud

26 vClou d vCloud Connector

27 Comparison Focus Costs of the Cloud

28 15:1 VM to Host Ratio 34 Hosts 2 CPU w/ 16 Cores Windows Server licensing additional Comprehensive Management 68 CPUs of Windows Server Datacenter

29 68 CPUs Hyper-V Server $0 68 CPUs System Center 2012 $122,638* Total Cost $122,638 Provides complete infrastructure management including: Application Performance Management, Self-Service, Backup & Application Protection, IT Service Management & Service Catalog, Orchestration and much more… * System Center Pricing: http://download.microsoft.com/download/1/1/1/11128EC7-2BE7-480C-9D46-4ECECA9E481A/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20Datasheet.pdfhttp://download.microsoft.com/download/1/1/1/11128EC7-2BE7-480C-9D46-4ECECA9E481A/System%20Center%202012%20Licensing%20Datasheet.pdf

30 68 CPUs vSphere ENT+ $237,660 1 vCenter $4,995 1 vCOPS ENT $97,500 2 vFabric APM $180,000 3 vFabric AD $125,000 4 vCloud Director $75,000 5 Costs, without S&S in excess of $720,155 yet lacks service management, workload protection, in-guest management, and costs grow with density due to per-VM licensing 1.vSphere Enterprise Plus CPU & vCenter Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html 2.vCenter Operations Management Suite Enterprise pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/buy.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/buy.html 3.vFabric Application Performance Manager Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-application-performance-manager/buy.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-application-performance-manager/buy.html 4.vFabric Application Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-appdirector/how-to-buy.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/application-platform/vfabric-appdirector/how-to-buy.html 5.vCloud Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-director/buy.htmlhttp://www.vmware.com/products/vcloud-director/buy.html

31 Summary Closing Thoughts

32 All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

33 Breakout Sessions: VIR312 - Compete to Win, Part 1: Core Hypervisors (Online) WSV317 - Building a Private Cloud in 75 Minutes (Online) WSV329 - Architecting Private Clouds Using Windows Server 2012 (Online) MGT305 - Application Management in Private and Public Clouds (Online) MGT320 - Microsoft System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012: Zero to Cluster to Cloud (Online) MGT328 - Automating Datacenter Using Microsoft System Center 2012 (Online) MGT330 - Private Cloud Service Delivery and Automation with Microsoft System Center 2012 (Online) MGT333 - System Center 2012: Managing Heterogeneous Environments with a Microsoft Private Cloud Hands-on Labs: MGT71-HOL, MGT41-HOL, MGT42-HOL, MGT53-HOL, MGT54-HOL Demos: MGT01-TLC (App), MGT04-TLC (Infra), MGT05-TLC (Services) Find Me At…the Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V Stand

34 Talk to our Experts at the TLC #TE(sessioncode) DOWNLOAD Windows Server 2012 Release Candidate microsoft.com/windowsserver Hands-On Labs DOWNLOAD Windows Azure Windowsazure.com/ teched

35 Connect. Share. Discuss. http://northamerica.msteched.com Learning Microsoft Certification & Training Resources www.microsoft.com/learning TechNet Resources for IT Professionals http://microsoft.com/technet Resources for Developers http://microsoft.com/msdn

36 Required Slide Complete an evaluation on CommNet and enter to win!

37

38

39


Download ppt "Compete to Win | Part II: Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Matt McSpirit | MCSE | MCITP | VCP Senior Product Marketing Manager Microsoft Corporation."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google