Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

National Histopathology Service for Transplantation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "National Histopathology Service for Transplantation"— Presentation transcript:

1 National Histopathology Service for Transplantation
Dom Summers Gavin Pettigrew Roberto Cacciola Chairman ladies and gentleman good afternoon, thank you for the opportunity to present some of my work in this session….

2 National Histopathology – the Consortium
NHS-BT James Neuberger, John Forsythe, Rutger Pleough, Claire Williment, Azimah Faiz NHS-BT Trials Unit Dave Collett, Alison Deary Clinical Lead for Organ Utilisation Chris Callaghan NHS England Histopathology – Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London Health Economist Ed Wilson Implementation Design Dr Karla Hemming Lay person representation Surgeons Roberto Cacciola, Gavin Pettigrew, Dom Summers Transplant Nephrologists Nick Torpey

3 Why do we need histopathology?
Exclusion of Malignancy Evaluation of Organ Quality

4 Assessment of Organ Quality
Dramatic change in UK kidney donor profile

5 UK donor demographics almost unique

6 Is the kidney donor pool underutilised?

7 Histopathology assessment of chronic injury
Age associated histological features of injury Correlation with outcome Grade or score the severity of baseline injury

8 The Remuzzi score Four different components to the score Glomerular, tubular, interstitial, vascular Score of 0 to 12. Score from 0 to 3 – Use and implant singly to 6 – Dual transplant >7 – Discard

9 Remuzzi G et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:343-352.
Representative Light Micrographs of Kidney Sections Illustrating the Histologic Scoring Criteria. The Remuzzi score Figure 1. Representative Light Micrographs of Kidney Sections Illustrating the Histologic Scoring Criteria. Panel A shows three sections of a kidney from a 65-year-old male donor of a single transplant (global score, 2). Panel B shows three sections of a kidney from a 64-year-old male donor of a dual transplant (global score, 5). Panel C shows three sections of a discarded kidney from a 65-year-old man (global score, >7). In each panel, the left section mainly shows glomerular changes, the middle section tubular interstitial changes, and the right section vascular changes. Remuzzi G et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:

10 Cambridge Histopathology Service
24 hour availability of consultant renal pathologists (only centre) Routine pre-implantation biopsy on kidneys from donors >65 Biopsy process takes 4-5 hours

11 Cambridge Histopathology Service
Confirmed that score equally applicable to DCD kidneys Implanting single kidneys that score >4 is associated with poor outcome.

12 Cambridge Histopathology Service
Discriminate ‘good’ quality kidneys from within the elderly donor pool Very acceptable outcomes

13 Excess Kidney Discard?

14 Impact on Waiting Times

15 Post-registration outcomes at 1, 3 and 5 years from listing for kidney registrations made from 2002 to 2008 Transplanted Waiting Removed Died Cambridge Under 45 45 to 65 Over 65 1 year 3 years 5 years 1 year 3 years 5 years 1 year 3 years 5 years p < 0.001 UK 1 year 3 years 5 years p = 0.02 p = 0.05 Lisa Bradbury, NHSBT

16 Impact of a National Histopathology Service?
Rapidly exclude malignancy Enable greater use of kidneys from potential donors – particularly elderly DCD Normalise DCD practice throughout UK If increases usage of kidneys from donors >60 years old by 10% ~ 300 additional kidney transplants annually

17

18 However? Increase in cold ischaemic times? Complications of biopsy?
Does it perhaps lead to excess kidney discard? Remains controversial in the US

19 National Histopathology – the Consortium
NHS-BT James Neuberger, John Forsythe, Rutger Pleough, Claire Williment, Azimah Faiz NHS-BT Trials Unit Dave Collett, Alison Deary Clinical Lead for Organ Utilisation Chris Callaghan NHS England Histopathology – Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London Health Economist Ed Wilson Implementation Design Dr Karla Hemming Lay person representation Surgeons Roberto Cacciola, Gavin Pettigrew, Dom Summers Transplant Nephrologists Nick Torpey

20 National Histopathology Service - Logistics?
Digital slide scanners Cambridge 24 hour histopathology BMS at four / five centres Electronic image transfer to histopathologist

21 The Devil is in the Detail
How to accurately assess the impact of a national histopathology service? Just how many extra kidney transplants are performed? What is their outcome? Pre-Implantion Trial of Histopathology In renal Allografts - the Pithia trial

22 Stepped-Wedge Cluster implementation
Histopathology is made available to each kidney centre sequentially, but randomly With 20 centres enrolled; evaluation lasts ~ two years Service evaluation – patient consent not required Powered statistically for a 10% increase in kidney transplant rates from donors >60

23 The Devil is in the Detail

24 What would it cost? £350,000 Preliminary application 23rd March 2016

25 Questions? NHS-BT James Neuberger, John Forsythe, Rutger Pleough, Claire Williment, Azimah Faiz NHS-BT Trials Unit Dave Collett, Alison Deary Clinical Lead for Organ Utilisation Chris Callaghan NHS England Histopathology – Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London Health Economist Ed Wilson Implementation Design Dr Karla Hemming Lay person representation Transplant Surgeons Roberto Cacciola, Gavin Pettigrew Transplant Nephrologists Nick Torpey

26

27 Survival from listing


Download ppt "National Histopathology Service for Transplantation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google