Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byIra Brooks Modified over 8 years ago
1
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 16: Internet III (Net Neutrality) Copyright © 2007
2
Spring, 2007CTL2 What is “Net Neutrality” Many different players comprise the I-net Fiber Backbone, Cable, DSL, Wireless, ISPs Some provide other services over same layers Voice, video, leased lines, propriety networks Many different services over the I-net WWW, VoIP, IPTV, P2P, ATM, VPN I-net suppliers want to prioritize services To guarantee Quality of Service in some cases I-net users don’t want to be de-prioritized They want NET NEUTRALITY
3
Spring, 2007CTL3 Quality of Service How delivered & assured Tiered (priority) services Higher throughput (broader pipes) Dedication pathways (proprietary networks) How priced? Metered telecommunications Wireline & wireless telephony Cable & satellite video Unmetered Broadcast Why shouldn’t the Internet be metered like these other services, based on cost recovery? Users of broadcast don’t “consume” scarce resources
4
Spring, 2007CTL4 Arguments in favor of Metering “Bellhead” perspective I-net carriers incur traffic sensitive charges Borne by the network (hardware & network layers) Application and content layers are “free riders” All-you-can-eat users impose network externalities QoS can solve network congestion Allocation by market pricing of scarce resources Vs. socialist economy (common sharing of expenses) Broadband replacing TS pricing & investment Same telcos own the PSTN and I-net backbone Should capture rents now going to content providers
5
Spring, 2007CTL5 Arguments Against Metering Nethead” perspective Network costs already built into access pricing Backbone providers charge ISPs, who charge users Tiering destroys leveling effect of I-net Exacerbates the digital divide QoS impedes, rather than promotes, innovation Service & content providers now compete by innov. Violates layering and end-to-end principles Price discrimination at TCP/IP level Impedes free speech function of I-net Skews “marketplace of ideas”
6
Spring, 2007CTL6 Regulating Network Neutrality Legacy telecom networks Govt-mandated neutrality a traditional feature FCC AT&T/BellSouth commitment to net neutrality Condition for merger approval (28 Dec 2006) Investigation into IP blocking by LEC Congress COPE ( Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006 ) [HR 5252]HR 5252 Passed House, fillibustered in Senate
7
Spring, 2007CTL7 Digital Divide Defined Differential access to the knowledge economy and advanced telecom services Broadband access & bandwidth Only rich nations/consumers widely deploy b-band Functionality I-net architecture favors developed world IPN space; English-language domain names Importance I-net / b-band contribute to econ development Social networking and democratization effects
8
Spring, 2007CTL8 Solving the Digital Divide Computing Affordable hardware: 1 laptop/child program Connectivity Regulatory subsidies (universal service?) IPv6; IDN Content Cultural & language accessibility Capacity ICT literacy
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.