1. 1 The US CMS upgrade: Support of R&D activities D. Bortoletto The CMS review process for upgrade activities US-CMS support of R&D activities The US- CMS upgrade R&D budget process FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

2. 2 CMS Upgrade R&D US-CMS CB Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 27/February/2009

3. 3 US-CMS Upgrade CERN LHC upgrade plan Phase 1 LHC upgrades L=2-4 ×10 34, 25 ns bunch crossing No changes to IR inside CMS and short downtime Phase 2 (to be decided) L =8-10×10 34, 25 or 50 ns bunch crossing Possible changes to IR inside CMS and long shutdown Prolonged operation at maximum Phase 1 luminosity CERN DG plan January 2008 Delay of at least one year is now foreseen because of the 2008 incident Integrated luminosity Phase 1  650 fb -1 Phase 2  5000 fb -1 Prolonged Phase 1  2000 fb -1 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

4. 4 Upgrade scope System Phase 1 Phase 2 Pixel New Pixel Detector (1 or 2 iterations?) Tracker FEDs? New Tracking System (incl Pixel) HCAL Electronics + PD replacement HF/HE? ECAL TP (Off Detector Electronics) ? EE? Muons ME4/2, ME1/1,RPC endcap, Minicrate spares, some CSC Electronics Electronics replacement Trigger HCAL/RCT/GCT to  TCA Complete replacement Some of these fall in between FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

5. 5 Documents Phase I Upgrades Phase 2 Upgrades Concept mid 2008 LOI/TP mid 2009 TDR Early 2010 Strawman Mid 2009 TP Mid 2010 TDR > 2012 Pixel ME4 Pixel ME4 HCAL Trigger HCAL Trigger Likely TP > 2011 Not before End 2009 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

6. 6 CMS upgrade organization Technical coordination R&D Proposal Review FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

7. 7 CMS call for R&D proposals In September 2007 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

8. 8 Template for R&D proposals Proposal: name/title Submitted date Abstract (< 1 page) Description of the R&D proposals activity intended to be approved as CMS Upgrade Project. Contact Person (Project Leader/responsible): XXXX YYYYYY Introduction (3-5 pages) Detailed project description Participating Institutions (< 1 page) Detailed list of institutions and peoples. Topic(s) and goal(s) of the R&D proposal (< 4 pages) The description of the proposed R&D activity should also indicate the areas covered, according with the structure of the activity matrix. Should be specified also the activity in collaboration with industrial partner and eventual connection with CMS institution(s) Relation to other WG and R&D activities (< 2 pages) How the proposals relate to already existing R&D activities. Specify technical issues and challenges. (Indicate also collaboration outside CMS). Schedule (< 2 pages) R&D activity schedule. List of milestones and of the intermediate steps needed to achieve the final goal(s). A table or project schedule should be produced and attached to the document. Detail of milestones accomplishment should be specified in terms of year quarters. Resources and resource table FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

9. 9 R&D proposals approved in 2007 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009 R&D on Novel Powering Schemes for the SLHC CMS Tracker RWTH Aachen, contact: Lutz FeldSep-07Approved7.01 Research and Development for CMS tracker in SLHC era Fermilab, Helsinki, Karlsruhe, Louvain, Padova Rochester Sep-06Approved6.01 Redesign of the Phi and Eta Trigger Track Finders for SLHC Vienna and U. A. Madrid GroupsSep-07Approved7.02 Redesign of the Global Trigger and Global Muon Trigger for SLHC Vienna GroupSep-07Approved7.03 SLHC Calorimeter Trigger R&D ProgramUniversity of WisconsinOct-07Approved7.04 CSC Level-1 Track-Finder Trigger upgradeFlorida, Rice, UCLAOct-07Approved7.05 Study of suitability of magnetic Czochralski silicon for the SLHC CMS strip tracker Fermilab, Helsinki, RochesterOct-07Approved7.06 R&D for Possible Replacement of Inner Pixel Layers With Aims for an SLHC Upgrade Alice Bean, Timothy Bolton, Aaron Dominguez, Wolfram Erdmann, Cecilia Gerber, Roland Horisberger, Angel Lopez Oct-07Approved7.07 R&D in preparation for an upgrade of CMS for the Super-LHC University of Bristol Brunel University Imperial College London Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Oct-07Approved7.08 Upgrade of CMS Barrel Muon Detector CIEMAT,Universidad de Cantabria,Torino, Bologna, It Padova, Bari, Pavia, Napoli, RWTH Aachen, Madrid, Legnaro, Frascati, Vienna Oct-07Approved7.09 CSC Endcap Muon UpgradesContact Person: Jay HauserOct-07Approved7.10 The Versatile Link Common Project CERN, Strasbourg, Oxford University, Southern Methodist University Nov-07Approved7.12 3D detectors for inner pixel layersDaniela Bortoletto/Simon KwanDec-07Approved7.13 CMS HCAL Calorimeter Electronics UpgradeDrew Baden, University of MarylandDec-07Approved7.14 Proposal for US CMS Pixel Mechanics R&D at Purdue and Fermilab in FY08 Daniela Bortoletto, Simon Kwan, Petra Merkel, Ian Shipsey, J.C. Yun Dec-07Approved7.15

10. 10 R&D proposals approved in 2008 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009 R&D for Thin Single-Sided Sensors with HPK Contact Person: Marcello MannelliJan-08Approved8.01 Materials, technologies and simulations for silicon sensor modules at intermediate to large radii of a new CMS tracker for SLHC Hamburg, Karlsruhe, Louvain, Vienna, VilniusMar-08Approved8.02 Development of pixel and micro-strip sensors on radiation tolerant substrates for the tracker upgrade at SLHC Contact Person: M. de PalmaApr-08Approved8.03 Power Distribution System Studies for the CMS Tracker Fermilab, Iowa, Mississippi (Contact Person: Simon Kwan) Jun-08Approved8.04 US CMS detector upgrades for PHASE 1 of the LHC luminosity upgrade US CMS (Contact Persons: Daniela Bortoletto, Joel Butler) Jul-08Approved8.05 Proposal for Cooling R&D for the Upgrade(s) of the CMS Tracker Antti Onnela, Hans Postema, Paola Tropea (CERN) Jul-08Approved8.06 Proposal for a First Level Trigger based on Tracking Lyon, Bari, Florence, Pisa, Barcelona, Boston, Minnesota, Brown (Contact: Fabrizio Palla) Nov-08Approved8.07

11. 11 R&D proposals submitted in 2009 1.Proposal for Quartz Plate Calorimeter as Upgrade to CMS Hadronic Endcap Calorimeters Iowa, Fairfield, Fermilab, Mississippi, Trieste (Contact: Yaser Onel) January, 2009 Approved 09.01Proposal for Quartz Plate Calorimeter as Upgrade to CMS Hadronic Endcap Calorimeters 2.Proposal for the Hadron Forward Calorimeter HF Upgrade Phase I Iowa, Fairfield, Fermilab, Maryland, Mississippi, Trieste (Contact: Yaser Onel) January, 2009 Approved 09.02Proposal for the Hadron Forward Calorimeter HF Upgrade Phase I 3.Proposal for Phase II Tracker and Trigger Planes based on Vertically Integrated Electronics Boston, Brown, CERN, Cornell, Davis, FNAL, Riverside, Rochester, Santa Barbara, Texas A&M, Vanderbilt (Contact: Ron Lipton) May, 2009 Approved 09.03Proposal for Phase II Tracker and Trigger Planes based on Vertically Integrated Electronics 4.EMC immunity studies for CMS Tracker Upgrade ITA- Aragon, IFCA - Cantabria (Contact: Fernando Arteche) June, 2009 Under Review 09.04EMC immunity studies for CMS Tracker Upgrade 5.Prototyping stacked modules for the L1 track trigger Aachen, Bristol,CERN, Brunel, Cornell, DESY, Imperial, Padova, Perugia, Torino, Karlsruhe, Lyon, Rice, Rutherford, Strasbourg, U.C. Santa Barbara, Vienna (contacts: Geoff Hall & Anders Ryd) August 2009 Under Review 09.05Prototyping stacked modules for the L1 track trigger 6.Proposal for R&D for GaAs or GaInP Photodetectors for SLHC ECAL Endcap Calorimeters University of Virginia and LightSpin Technologies, Inc. (Contact: Brad Cox) October 2009 Under Review 09.06Proposal for R&D for GaAs or GaInP Photodetectors for SLHC ECAL Endcap Calorimeters 7.US CMS Plans for Phase 1 SLHC Upgrade US CMS (Contact: Joel Butler) October 2009 Under Review 09.07US CMS Plans for Phase 1 SLHC Upgrade FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

12. 12 CMS review process guiding principles Identify and support R&D that matches CMS upgrade goals Avoid duplication of R&D efforts Facilitate R&D collaborations between different regions Organize financial collaborations between different regions to achieve the R&D goals (example recent submission of R&D sensor with Hamamatsu supported by US, CERN, Italy, Germany) CMS has established an Upgrade Project Office to guide the infrastructure issues of the upgrade plan, which are crucial given the constraints on power, cabling, and cooling affecting the detector. The office will oversee large scale mechanics, cooling, etc (for example already playing a role to establish if CO 2 cooling is feasible etc.) FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

13. 13 CMS Review of approved proposals The CMS upgrade peer review chair has just started a review process to evaluate the progress of proposals that were approved in 2007 The process requires: Submission of a status report A formal presentation to the upgrade management board followed by questions/discussion The first reviews will take place at the Nov. 20 and Jan. 21 Upgrade MB meetings FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

14. 14 US CMS R&D Organization US-CMS R&D Work is integrated as much as possible with the CMS Upgrade R&D project which is led by an international upgrade management group. Activities are established through upgrade proposals, reviewed by CMS internal referees, and endorsed by the upgrade management board The CMS review does not explicitly recommend budget levels, or prioritize proposals. US-CMS has to deal with a limited budget and therefore we have to take into account many other issues before supporting an approved proposal with funds FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

15. 15 US-CMS call for proposal Solicitation of proposals to support US-CMS R&D activities is initiated through the sub-systems or directly from the Pis (usually in May-June) The proposals received are assembled in the supporting documentation posted at: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/particle/us_cms We would like to have all proposals to be reviewed by CMS before providing support HCAL (D. Baden) Strips (Incandela & Demina)* DAQ (V. O’dell) ECAL (B. Hirosky)Pixels (S. Kwan)*Simulation (H. Chaung) EMU (J. Hauser)Trigger (W. Smith)*Data Links (D. Bortoletto) * Are also L2 managers FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

16. 16 Request of information The information requested: 1) R&D Topic 2) People involved, percentage of time and job category (e.g. engineer, technician, etc.) 3) Breakdown of costs between materials, travel, salary 4) Major accomplishments in FY09 (can make reasonable extrapolation to end of FY09) 5) List of goals for FY10 The request does not only aim at soliciting new proposals but also to evaluate if groups already receiving R&D funds are accomplishing their goals A formal review of the progress will also be implemented in US-CMS Ad hoc reviews have been already performed to evaluate the most expensive efforts ( one was done last week for the CO2 cooling) FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

17. 17 FY09 Proposed budget FY08 FY09 Requested Budget FY09 proposed Budget% HCAL285,000758,500455,5000.20 ECAL50,000267,000120,0000.05 EMU15,000270,000260,0000.12 STRIP183,000513,374332,2540.15 PIXEL670,0001,561,808862,0560.38 TRIGGER0288,268278,2680.12 DAQ0180,00048,0000.02 SIMULATION100,000465,062120,0000.05 DATA LINKS428,540210,9200.09 TRAVEL50,0000.00 total1,353,0004,732,5522,686,9981.19 Joel’s guidance was 2,250,000 Preliminary budget was presented to L2 managers + USCMS management in a meeting in July 2008

18. 18 FY09 Budget FY09 budget finalized in October to start the SOW process Joel’s guidance increased to $ 2.5 M SystemFY08FY09 HCAL285,000488,000 ECAL50,000 49,000 EMU15,000260,000 STRIP183,000234,816 PIXEL670,000842,072 TRIGGER0269,268 DAQ0 40,000 SIMULATION100,000 90,000 DATA LINKS226,844 TRAVEL50,000 TOTAL1,353,0002,500,000 Difficult choices were made to meet the budget guidance Focus on Phase 1 needs and critical Phase 2 issues: Phase 1: 83 % Phase 2: 17% Small Mid year bump (  200k) was given to upgrade activities: Diamond R&D HCAL and ECAL beam test activities Track trigger effort FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

19. 19 US-CMS upgrade R&D R&D activities currently limited by budget not by lack of interest Many excellent groups interested in participating in upgrade both Phase 1 and Phase 2 Over 20 groups receive funding for R&D SystemGroupArea HCAL/EMU/TRACKERFNALSiPm/ME42/ Pixel cooling/Optolinks HCALIowaFE/mechanics HCALPrincetonSiPm/Decoding HCALMarylandBackend/trigger HCALBostonSiPM/ HCAL/ECALMinnesotaBackend/trigger/Opto-links ECALVirginiaBackend/trigger/new photodetectors ECALCaltechRad-hard Crystals EMUWisconsinME4/2Chambers EMUTAMUSoftware/trigger EMURiceTrigger EMUFloridaTrigger EMUOSUME1/1 FE TRIGGERWisconsinHCAL/ECAL TRACKERUCSBMechanics TRACKERRochesterSensor/Beam test TRACKERBrownSensor/Beam Test TRACKERCornellSensors/trigger TRACKERPurdueSensors/mechanics/Layout TRACKERPIRESensors/ ROC/ Interconnections SOFTWAREUCR,Vanderbilt,.. Tracker Straw-man/trigger PIRE (Partnership in International Research and Education): Nebraska, Kansas, Kansas State, Puerto Rico, UIC

20. 20 R&D Budget evolution The R&D for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is complex Phase 1 will continue ramp up in FY10 and FY11. Then it will decrease as construction funds will start. R&D funding will not decrease because at that point Phase 2 R&D is needed to prepare for the TDR SystemFY08FY09FY10FY11 Phase 11,123,0002,075,000 Phase 2230,000425,000 TOTAL1,353,0002,500,0003,500,0004,150,000 FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009

21. 21 Conclusions The detector R&D for the LHC luminosity upgrade is requiring strong support US CMS is providing limited and targeted funding to support R&D that matches the phase 1 and phase 2 upgrade determined by CMS FNAL UPGRADE Meeting Daniela Bortoletto FNAL 29/October/2009