Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

October 5, 2011. Central Repository - Responsibilities Law Enforcement Prosecutor Courts Collection and Dissemination 2,500,000+ Tenprints 20,000+ Latent.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "October 5, 2011. Central Repository - Responsibilities Law Enforcement Prosecutor Courts Collection and Dissemination 2,500,000+ Tenprints 20,000+ Latent."— Presentation transcript:

1 October 5, 2011

2 Central Repository - Responsibilities Law Enforcement Prosecutor Courts Collection and Dissemination 2,500,000+ Tenprints 20,000+ Latent AFIS Assigned by AFIS Differentiated by Role SID Numbers 12,000 + Registered Sex Offenders Sex Offender Registry Criminal Arrests Certification Papers Juvenile Offender File Internet CD-Rom Charge Code Manual

3 Arrest Data Prosecutor Action DOC Court Action Missouri Criminal Records Repository Arrest data from 499 agencies Prosecutor and Court actions at state level from 435 agencies Municipal reporting from 138 agencies Data received from 8 correctional facilities

4  Records Quality Index (RQI)  The Records Quality Index was developed by Structured Decisions Corporation (SDC) in conjunction with the Bureau of Justice Statistics to measure state progress in improving records quality over time.  The RQI is based on a small set of key outcome and process measures which characterize the performance of large-scale criminal history record systems.

5  Records Quality Index (RQI)  In 1997, Missouri’s RQI was calculated to be 39  At that time the National Records Quality Index (a weighted average) was calculated to be 62  56% of Missouri criminal history records were judged to have final dispositions attached

6

7

8  Missouri Police Chief’s Association  Missouri Sheriff’s Association  Missouri Office of Prosecution Services  Missouri Office of the State Court Administrator  Missouri State Highway Patrol  Missouri Department of Corrections Working with Policy Makers and Stakeholders

9 Understanding the Circle of Life

10 Arresting Agency Prosecuting Attorney Court DOC Submits to CJIS: Fingerprints Name/Alias Names Date of Birth SSN OCN Arrest Charge DOA OLN Central Repository CJIS submits back to Arresting Agency: OCN/ SID/FBI # Failure to Appear/ Warrant Issued Arresting Agency submits to PA: SIDOCN NameDOB Arrest ChargeDOA SSNOLN PA Submits to CJIS: SID OCN Name Arresting Agency Charges Filed/Nolle SSN DOA PA Submits to Court: SID OCN Name DOB Charges Filed SSN DOA OLN Court Submits to CJIS: SID OCN Name DOB Disposition SSN Court Submits back to Entering Agency: SID OCN Name DOB Charges Filed SSN OLN Court Submits to DOC: SID OCN Name DOB Sentence SSN DOC submits to CJIS: SIDOCN NameDOB Event DateSSN Entering Law- Enforcement Agency: Enters Warrant Information into MULES/NCIC The Circle of Life Moves us all!

11 WHY DO I HAVE TO DO THIS? Arrest, charge and disposition of misdemeanors and felonies to be sent to Highway Patrol. 43.503 RSMo 43.500 – 43.650 RSMo  Mandates reporting to MCRR  Defines OCN (Offense Cycle Number)  Reporting procedures  Defines reportable offenses

12 Child, Elder and Disabled Care Licensing and Employment Certifications and Permits With Fingerprints – 12,000 By Name – 57,000 State Agency and Private Record Checks Per Month Who Uses Criminal History?

13 Improvements to Law-Enforcement Reporting

14 WHY DO I HAVE TO DO THIS? PART II ALL Felony Offenses, Class A Misdemeanors (except general driving and wildlife violations) Comparable ordinance violation having all the essential elements of a statutory felony or class A misdemeanor RSMo 43.506

15 Livescan Devices  Missouri currently has 235 livescan devices in use at 214 different agencies throughout the state.  In 2006 DPS, SEMA, MOPCA, MOSA, and MSHP worked together on a homeland security grant which resulted in purchasing 125 portable livescan devices for Police and Sheriff’s Departments. With an additional 23 devices purchased and installed in 2007 and 2008.  There are currently only 15 counties throughout the state that do not have livescan capabilities.

16 Livescan County Map Sheriff Department Devices Police Department Devices Counties with Livescan Device

17 Criminal Fingerprint Cards Received at the Central Repository 192,084 175,365 201,099 172,997 122,055 87,738 51,805 38,789 33,905 37,152

18

19  The prosecuting attorney (including the municipal prosecuting attorney) shall notify the central repository of his or her decision to not file a criminal charge on any charge referred to such prosecuting attorney or circuit attorney.  All records shall include  the state offense cycle number.  the charge code for the offense.  the ORI of the prosecutor. RSMo 43.503

20  In 2006 the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services (MOPS) began implementing the Karpel Case Management System (KCMS) in county prosecutor offices throughout the state.  This system allows the electronic reporting of prosecutor actions directly to the repository via weekly FTP.

21  The KCMS program can electronically receive arrest/referral information from local law- enforcement.  In addition KCMS can electronically submit initial misdemeanor and felony filings to the court’s automated Justice Information System (JIS).

22  Currently 82 of the 115 county prosecutor offices utilize KCMS.  Electronic prosecutor reporting has increased from 7,396 actions in 2000 to 80,595 actions in 2010 due to KCMS implementations.

23

24 WHY DO I HAVE TO DO THIS? PART IV  Court clerks (including municipal court clerks) shall report a record of  all charges filed  including all those added subsequent to the filing of a criminal court case  amended charges  all final dispositions of cases that the central repository has a record of an arrest. RSMo 43.503

25  As of April 2008, all of Missouri’s state courts have completed conversion to the Justice Information System (JIS), an automated court case management system administered by the Office of the State Court Administrator (OSCA).  Like KCMS, JIS allows the electronic reporting of court actions directly to the repository via weekly FTP.

26  In August of 2010, OSCA completed the implementation of an automated process to report prosecutor charge filings and amendments to the repository on behalf of prosecutors.  To accommodate this process, OSCA developed an interface with KCMS to electronically receive criminal case filing data from prosecutors.

27

28 WHY DO I HAVE TO DO THIS? PART V  The Department of Corrections shall report to the central repository a record of  Receipt, escape, execution, death, release, pardon, parole, commutation of sentence, granting of executive clemency, legal name change, or discharge of an individual who has been sentenced to the department’s custody. RSMo 43.503

29  In February of 2008 the Missouri Department of Corrections implemented an interface with the Central Repository for all custody information.  Like both KCMS and JIS, this interface allows the electronic reporting of custody events directly to the repository via weekly FTP.

30  Records Quality Index (RQI)  As of 2008 Missouri’s RQI is 191, up from an RQI of only 39 in 1997.  66% of criminal history records are now judged to have final dispositions attached.  72.15% of arrests within past five years have final dispositions attached.

31

32  Includes a re-write of six core Missouri systems:  Computerized Criminal History System (CCH)  Missouri Sex Offender Registry System (MOSOR)  Missouri Uniform Law Enforcement System (MULES)  Record Management System (RMS)  Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)  Mobile System

33  Will be National Fingerprint File Compliant (NFF)  Planning enhanced Prosecutor, Court, and Corrections interfaces to include daily or real- time reporting.  Will Expand the sharing of “Circle of Life” information to all criminal justice stakeholders.

34  Municipal courts interfaces with large municipalities using REJIS and InCode Case Management systems are in the planning stages.  Both the Office of the State Court Administrator and the Missouri Department of Corrections will be implementing new systems within the next three years, offering further opportunities for improvement.

35


Download ppt "October 5, 2011. Central Repository - Responsibilities Law Enforcement Prosecutor Courts Collection and Dissemination 2,500,000+ Tenprints 20,000+ Latent."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google