Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story."— Presentation transcript:

1 Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story

2 Indicator 1 Graduation Rate State Target: 80%; State Average: 56.3% 47.5% 37.8% Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma. 05-0606-0707-08 45.8% 08-09 43.9% 09-10 44.3% 10-11 42.0%

3 Indicator 2 Drop Out State Target: 6.0%; State Average: 8.0% 8.3%9.7% Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school. 05-0606-0707-08 6.8% 08-09 8.4% 09-10 11.7%

4 Indicator 3 Assessment Participation & Performance/Reading 07-0808-0909-1010-11 99100 9673 92 GradeState Target 3-895 1095 0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor) GradeState Target 3-843.2 1038.5 07-0808-0909-1010-11 24.139.845.642.0 22.223.325.720.3 Participation Performance

5 Indicator 3 Assessment Participation & Performance/Math GradeState Target 3-877.2 1068.4 07-0808-0909-1010-11 39.8 56.061.461.0 27.839.351.951.6 0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor) GradeState Target 3-895 1095 07-0808-0909-1011-12 99 100 84737694 Performance Participation

6 Indicator 4 Suspension/Expulsion Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater. State Target: 7%; State Average: 2.3% 06-07 0.3% 0% 07-0808-09 1.0% 09-10 n/a

7 Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21 served in regular, separate, or public, private, home or hospital settings.

8 Indicator 5 Least Restrictive Environment Amount of Removal State Target Regular64.6% Separate15.7% 05-0606-07 55.452.3 24.122.6 07-0808-0909-1010-11 50.161.859.658.6 20.018.517.515.9

9 Indicator 6 Preschool LRE No data or targets set at this time

10 Indicator 7 Early Childhood Outcomes Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in positive social-emotional skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and skills, and use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. A.% Substantially improvement by age 6 B.% Functioning at age 6 SkillsState Target State Average NHCS 08-09 NHCS 09-10 A. Social/EmotionalTBD88.9%86.0%90% B. Social/EmotionalTBD57.0%41.0%47% A. Com/LiteracyTBD89.0%82.0%77% B. Com/LiteracyTBD54.1%52.0%56% A. Approp. BehaviorTBD88.3%87.0%86% B. Approp. BehaviorTBD67.9%58.0%60%

11 Indicator 8 Parent Involvement Percent of parents with a school age child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities. State Target: 40%. 08-09 43.0%

12 Indicator 9 Disproportionality Spec Ed Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. State Target 0% NHCS 0%

13 Indicator 10 Disproportionality by Category NHCS data indicate disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. State target: 0% NHCS – 0%

14 Indicator 11 90 Day Timeline Percent of children referred for whom a referral was received and placement determined within 90 days. State Target: 100% 45% 77% 05-0606-0707-0808-09 90%67% 09-10 95%

15 Indicator 12 Part C to Part B Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive special education and related services by their third birthday. State Target: 100% 74% 78% 05-0606-0707-0808-09 96%88% 09-10 100%

16 Indicator 13 IEPs and Postsecondary Goals Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the child to meet the postsecondary goals.

17 Indicator 13 IEPs and Postsecondary Goals 6% 24% 05-0606-0707-08 35% 100% Corrected within a year State Target: 100% 08-09 64% 100% 09-10 71% 100%

18 Indicator 14 Post-School Outcomes Percent of youth who had IEP’s, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or, both, within one year of leaving high school. State Baseline Data: 75% NHCS Baseline: 70%

19 Indicator 15 General Supervision Part 1 Percent of noncompliance identified and corrected within one year. State Target: 100% 100% 05-06 06-07 100% 07-08 100% 08-09 100% 09-10 100%

20 Indicator 15 General Supervision Part 2 Percent of compliance rate of Internal Record Review. State Target: 100% 25% 05-06 06-07 66% 07-08 91% 08-09 81% 09-10 90%

21 What’s the Plan (PreK-12)? Training in Intensive Scientific, Research-based Reading and Math instruction (Language!, Corrective Reading, Number Worlds) KU Content Literacy Continuum (Secondary Pilot) Superintendent’s Graduation-Dropout Task Force Response to Instruction (RTI) K-8 & Preschool Play Based Assessment Add School-wide Positive Behavior Support Sites Intensified training, tools and monitoring practices in implementation and compliance

22 IDEA 2004 – 34 CFR 300.604 Meets Requirements (NHCS status – 08-09 & 09-10) Needs Assistance – Direct the use of funds Needs Intervention – Withhold funds Needs Substantial Intervention – Recover Funds What are the consequences?

23 Questions?


Download ppt "Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google