Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon.

Published byWalter Harrison Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon."— Presentation transcript:

1 Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon Kang Emilia Kyung Jin 2013 KOMES Spring Meeting & KIAPS International Workshop

2 Contents  Objective  Implementation of Other Schemes to the UM  Results from UM SCM  Future Plans 2

3 Objective

4 Objective 4 Stage 1 (2011~2013)  Establishment of the Foundation & Development of Source Technology Develop and evaluate radiation parameterization  Developing Test Model Improve radiation parameterization  Developing Operational Model Evaluate, improve, and complete radiation parameterization on the operational model Stage 2 (2014~2016) Stage 3 (2017~2019)  Development of radiation parameterization as a part of physics package for the KIAPS operational global NWP model

5 Objective 5 Stage 1 (2011~2013)  Establishment of the Foundation & Development of Source Technology Develop and evaluate radiation parameterization  Developing Test Model Improve radiation parameterization  Developing Operational Model Evaluate, improve, and complete radiation parameterization on the operational model Stage 2 (2014~2016) Stage 3 (2017~2019)  Evaluate radiation parameterization schemes using single column model

6 Implementation of Other Schemes to the UM

7 7 Radiation Scheme at Each NWP Model Organization UK Met Office NCEPNRLECMWFNCARUCAR Model UMGFSNOGAPSIFSWRFCESM Radiation Scheme Edwards- Slingo , Sun- Edwards- Slingo RRTM ,  Harshvard han RRTMRRTM, RRTMG, New Goddard , Fu-Liou- Gu , CAM, GFDL RRTMG   Implemented to the UM SCM and global model  Offline code

8 Schematic of Radiation Calculation 8 Input data setup (Developmental Testbed Center)

9 UM ES (Edwards and Slingo, 1996; Cusack et al., 1999) WRF Goddard (Chou and Suarez, 1999; Chou et al., 2001) WRF Fu-Liou-Gu (Fu and Liou, 1992; 1993) GFS RRTM (Mlawer et al, 1997) No. of Bands SW 611614 LW 9101216 Gases H 2 O, O 3, CO 2, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12 H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12 H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12, CO, NO, SO 2, NO 2, O 2, CH 3 Cl H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH 4, CO, O 2, CFC11, CFC12, CFC22, CCL4 Gaseous absorption Correlated k-distribution method Cloud and condensate water cloud, ice cloud, snow, rain, and graupel water cloud, ice cloud, snow, and rain Cloud overlap Maximum-Random overlap Calculation of flux Two-stream (clear-sky) mixed-column, maximum-column (cloudy) Two-stream adding Delta 4-stream approx. (SW) Delta 2-stream approx. (LW) Two-stream adding Comparison of Radiation Schemes

10 Overview of Implementation of Other Radiation Schemes to the UM Atmos_physics1 scm_main scm_shell atm_step u_model umshell flumemain ni_rad_ctl UM main program Perform an atmosphere timestep Radiation control SCUM main program Slow physics processes glue_rad r2_swrad3c r2_lwrad3c Radiation timestep? Sunlight? flux_calc Yes Shortwave Longwave Calculate flux glue_rad r2_swrad3c r2_lwrad3c Radiation timestep? Sunlight? flux_calc Yes Shortwave Longwave Calculate flux new_rad r2_swrad3c_wrf r2_lwrad3c_wrf Radiation timestep? Sunlight? flux_calc_wrf Yes Shortwave Longwave Calculate flux New Radiation scheme? Yes No

11 Results from UM SCM

12 12 Single Column Model - SGP site  ARM-2000 SGP IOP (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement – 2000 Intensive Operation Period at the Southern Great Plains) Period: March, 2000 Location: Centered near Lamont, Oklahoma 25°N~45°N, 120°W~80°W (Center of Lat. and Lon.: 36.61°N, 97.49°W)  Configuration of Single Column Model Model run period: 17:30 UTC, March 1, 2000 ~ 17:30 UTC, March 21, 2000 (20 days) Timestep: 900 s Forcing data: 17:30 UTC March 1, 2000 ~ 8:30 UTC March 1, 2000 (every 3 hours)

13 UM ES (Edwards and Slingo, 1996; Cusack et al., 1999) WRF Goddard (Chou and Suarez, 1999; Chou et al., 2001) WRF Fu-Liou-Gu (Fu and Liou, 1992; 1993) GFS RRTM No. of Bands SW 611614 LW 9101216 Gases H 2 O, O 3, CO 2, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12 H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12 H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH4, CFC11, CFC12, CO, NO, SO 2, NO 2, O 2, CH 3 Cl H 2 O, CO 2, O 3, N 2 O, CH 4, CO, O 2, CFC11, CFC12, CFC22, CCL4 Gaseous absorption Correlated k-distribution method Cloud and condensate water cloud, ice cloud, snow, rain, and graupel water cloud, ice cloud, snow, and rain Cloud overlap Maximum-Random overlap Calculation of flux Two-stream (clear-sky) mixed-column, maximum-column (cloudy) Two-stream adding Delta 4-stream approx. (SW) Delta 2-stream approx. (LW) Two-stream adding Run time1m 6s 1m 10s 1m 23s1m 7s Single Column Model - SGP site

14 14  Vertical distributions of cloud fraction from observation, Edwards- Slingo, Goddard, and Fu-Liou-Gu scheme  All four schemes overestimated upper and middle level clouds.

15 Single Column Model - SGP site 15  Mean fluxes (W/m 2 ) ESRRTMGoddardFLG LW UP TOA200.2211.9214.9226.7 LW DN SFC305.2305.8287.5292.9 LW UP SFC357.1358.1355.0360.7 SW UP TOA141.7148.1116.7125.0 SW DN SFC137.2148.8179.0180.5 SW UP SFC23.325.331.036.1

16 Single Column Model - SGP site  Comparison of heating rate profile

17 17  Difference of SW heating rate from Edwards-Slingo method Single Column Model - SGP site

18  Comparison of cooling rate profile

19 19  Difference of LW cooling rate from Edwards-Slingo method Single Column Model - SGP site

20 20  Heating rate, cooling rate, and temperature profile for clear sky showed similar patterns with small differences  Temperature profile in the troposphere was very similar between four schemes.  Vertical profile of (a) heating rate, (b) cooling rate, and (c) temperature for clear sky (a) (b) (c)

21 Summary and Future Plans  Radiation schemes were evaluated using single column model.  Each scheme showed differences in fluxes and heating/cooling rate mainly due to the differences in the prediction of cloud amounts.  Evaluate radiation schemes thoroughly using single column model, offline code, and KIAPS 3D framework  compare fluxes and heating/cooling rate between measurement, single column model, offline code, 3D model  evaluate sensitivity of gases, clouds, aerosols, etc.  Develop or improve radiation parameterization scheme through extensive evaluation

Download ppt "Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Comparison of Radiation Schemes Using a Single Colum Model Joonsuk Lee Jung-Yoon."

Similar presentations

© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation Parametrisation Current development work with the UM James Manners, visit to Reading University on 19 th February.

© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation Parametrisation Current development work with the UM James Manners, visit to Reading University on 19 th February.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.

Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
3) Empirical estimate of surface longwave radiation Use an empirical estimate of the clear-sky surface downward longwave radiation (SDLc) to estimate the.

3) Empirical estimate of surface longwave radiation Use an empirical estimate of the clear-sky surface downward longwave radiation (SDLc) to estimate the.
Links Between Clear-sky Radiation, Water Vapour and the Hydrological Cycle Richard P. Allan 1, Viju O. John 2 1 Environmental Systems Science Centre, University.

Links Between Clear-sky Radiation, Water Vapour and the Hydrological Cycle Richard P. Allan 1, Viju O. John 2 1 Environmental Systems Science Centre, University.
Evaluating the Met Office global forecast model using GERB data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading.

Evaluating the Met Office global forecast model using GERB data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre, University of Reading.
EUMETSAT 2006 Helsinki Exploitation of GERB/SEVIRI data for evaluation of the Met Office global forecast model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental.

EUMETSAT 2006 Helsinki Exploitation of GERB/SEVIRI data for evaluation of the Met Office global forecast model Richard Allan, Tony Slingo Environmental.
GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.

GERB/CERES Meeting 2006 Exeter Evaluation of clouds and radiation in the Met Office global forecast model using GERB/SEVIRI data Richard Allan, Tony Slingo.
METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.

METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.
Shortwave Radiation Options in the WRF Model

Shortwave Radiation Options in the WRF Model
An Evaluation of the Surface Radiation Budget Over North America for a Suite of Regional Climate Models Student: Marko Markovic Director: Colin Jones Université.

An Evaluation of the Surface Radiation Budget Over North America for a Suite of Regional Climate Models Student: Marko Markovic Director: Colin Jones Université.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.

3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
Comparison of the CAM and RRTMG Radiation Schemes in WRF and coupled WRF-CMAQ models Aijun Xiu, Zac Adelman, Frank Binkowski, Adel Hanna, Limei Ran Center.

Comparison of the CAM and RRTMG Radiation Schemes in WRF and coupled WRF-CMAQ models Aijun Xiu, Zac Adelman, Frank Binkowski, Adel Hanna, Limei Ran Center.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.

WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation developments Latest work on the radiation code in the Unified Model James Manners, Reading collaboration meeting.

© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation developments Latest work on the radiation code in the Unified Model James Manners, Reading collaboration meeting.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.

The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu Department of Atmospheric Science University of Washington.
Cloud-Climate Feedbacks as a Result of Solar Cloud Absorption in the SKYHI General Circulation Model Carynelisa Erlick, Atmospheric Sciences, Hebrew University.

Cloud-Climate Feedbacks as a Result of Solar Cloud Absorption in the SKYHI General Circulation Model Carynelisa Erlick, Atmospheric Sciences, Hebrew University.
Implementation of the Updated Goddard Longwave and Shortwave Radiation Packages in WRF Toshi Matsui, Wei-Kuo Tao, and Roger Shi representing Goddard Mesoscale.

Implementation of the Updated Goddard Longwave and Shortwave Radiation Packages in WRF Toshi Matsui, Wei-Kuo Tao, and Roger Shi representing Goddard Mesoscale.
ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. 2 Improve the performance of general circulation models (GCMs) used for climate research and prediction.

ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. 2 Improve the performance of general circulation models (GCMs) used for climate research and prediction.
Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Shashi K. Gupta, Paul W. Stackhouse Jr.*, Taiping Zhang, and J. Colleen Mikovitz.

Climate Science Branch, Science Directorate NASA Langley Research Center Shashi K. Gupta, Paul W. Stackhouse Jr.*, Taiping Zhang, and J. Colleen Mikovitz.
The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.

The Radiative Budget of an Atmospheric Column in Tropical Western Pacific Zheng Liu 1 Thomas Ackerman 1,2, Sally McFarlane 2, Jim Mather 2, University.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google