Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Leader+ Steering Committee Meeting 12 March 2008 in Brussels / Belgium Leader+ Transnational Cooperation database Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Leader+ Steering Committee Meeting 12 March 2008 in Brussels / Belgium Leader+ Transnational Cooperation database Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory."— Presentation transcript:

1 Leader+ Steering Committee Meeting 12 March 2008 in Brussels / Belgium Leader+ Transnational Cooperation database Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory Contact Point European Commission

2 The European Leader+ Website http://ec.europa.eu/leaderplushttp://ec.europa.eu/leaderplus Main menu:  Contact details of all Leader+ actors (in ‘Who’s who’)  Documents of the European Leader+ events  Leader+ country data sheets  Publications in pdf-format (Magazine and Flash News)  Publication materials/communication package  Library / Archives / FAQ etc. Interactive Tools:  Monitoring Indicators database  Leader+ Infobank  LAG Database  Database of transnational cooperation projects  Partner Search Tool: Instrument for encouraging transnational cooperation  European database of Leader+ good practices  Leader Competence Pool  Events calendar  Subscription form for publications

3 Number of LAGs under Leader+

4 Selected theme under Leader+  Natural and cultural resources most popular – 34%  New know-how and new technologies least popular – 13%

5 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ (based on data from January 2008) Total of 383 registered projects Origin of projects ?  The highest numbers of projects are coming from:  UK (15%)  France (15 %)  Finland (12 %)  Germany (12 %)  Italy (11 %) * concerns projects where a national LAG is a lead partner

6 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ (based on data as at 1 January 2008) LAGs’ involvement in the leadership :  The most active LAGs: Ireland, Sweden, Finland and UK  Why?

7 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Who are the partners?:  A t least 464 LAGs are involved in cooperation, with an average 4 per project  Approximately 15% of them are not Leader+ LAGs:  LAGs financed under previous Leader programmes  Partnerships financed under national programmes (PRODER, POMO)  Other bodies involved in the cooperation:  Tourism and development agencies, associations (environmental, educational, heritage), local and regional authorities, universities and research institutes.

8 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Where do the partners come from?  All EU-15 MS  New Member states: Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Slovenia, Malta, Cyprus and Romania  Azerbajdjan, Brazil, Canada, Georgia, Lebanon, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Morocco, Mozambique, Norway, Switzerland, Russia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkey etc…

9 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ On which themes do they cooperate?  Predominant theme: best use of natural and cultural resources  Two next most popular themes chosen: quality of life, use of new know-how and new technologies  Least popular: adding value to local products

10 Transnational cooperation under Leader+: comparison between LAG theme and TCP theme  Natural and cultural resources is most popular in both cases  Use of new know-how and new technologies is more popular when part of a TCP – Why?

11 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Which intervention fields ?  Best use of natural and cultural resources:  Nature and environment (waste management, protection, biodiversity, technology)  Culture and education (training, awareness raising, religion, art, museums and history)  Tourism (tourism concept, booking structures, eco-tourism, tourism trails)

12 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Which intervention fields ?  Use of new know-how and new technologies:  Marketing and promotion (tourism products, local products, natural and cultural sites) through common web sites and booking structures  Professional training NB. Theme is more popular as Action 2 than Action 1 project.

13 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Which intervention fields ?  Improving the quality of life:  Culture and education (languages, links with new inhabitants, events)  Training (professional and life-long training aimed at SME, focused on local resources)  Raising awareness on subjects linked with environmental protection / nature (sustainable tourism)

14 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Which intervention fields ?  Adding value to local products:  Economy (cooperation between SME / producers)  Marketing (e-commerce)  Food quality and brand development  Crafts  Tourism

15 Transnational cooperation with NMS under Leader: the challenges  LAG selection procedures have been terminated only recently in 3 NMS (PL, LV, EST), 4 other NMS (CY, SK, SL, MT) do not provide financial support for cooperation at all  Very short time for implementation of projects  Low budget assigned per LAG  Little previous experience  Structures which could assist are still under development

16 Transnational cooperation under Leader+EU-15: some examples  Magazine 2: Austria + Germany: Training for cultural guides and regional museum management. 3 LAGs  Important project aspects: -Strong basis for cooperation based on linking history and culture with tourism and employment -Visit to Italy where similar project already implemented -Clarification of approval procedures at national level -Agreement of leading LAG and its financial role -Agreement between LAGs re. areas of competence and responsibility -Understanding of need to prepare for market entry: publicity materials, web-site etc.  Provides a sustainable basis for future cooperation and a ‘best practise’ example

17 Transnational cooperation under Leader+EU-15: some examples  Magazine 3: France + Germany: EURO LAND ART: 2 LAGs  Important aspects: -Common project idea provides the regions with a modern and creative image -Idea developed together: importance of setting up early meetings project goals, and a clear steps and responsibilities -Need for site visits in both regions and adapt the project to reflect the different cultural differences: common branding on marketing materials; publicity for each partner in each country -Create awareness by showing both differences and similarities of each region by involving local actors: chefs; writers; and naturalists etc. -Project served two regions with very similar: languages; culture; natural resources and economic needs. -Evaluation and general analysis to decide to continue

18 Transnational cooperation under Leader+EU-15: some examples  Magazine 4: France + Spain: GRUS: ornithological tourism network: 15 LAGs (incl. non-Leader+)  Important aspects: -Based on a Leader II project: but a more focussed target group -Based on common zones of special interests: awareness of nature conservation required for all participating LAGs -Language barriers and cultural differences had to be overcome -Development of: common tourist packages/management systems to be later adapted for different sites -Exploitation of new technologies for common use

19 Transnational cooperation under Leader+ Thank you for your attention !


Download ppt "Leader+ Steering Committee Meeting 12 March 2008 in Brussels / Belgium Leader+ Transnational Cooperation database Martin Law, Team Leader, Leader+ Observatory."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google