1. Committee on Information Technology Performance Sub-Committee Fire Department AVL Project January 2009

2. Project Team Summary Project Manager – Michelle Geddes, DEM Project Manager – Capt. Robert Kuzma, SFFD Project Engineer – Alan Tse, DEM Mobile Environment Engineers – John Leung, DT and Ray Ramirez, DT Project Sponsor – Mitch Sutton, DEM Vendors: Tiburon, Trimble, Deccan, and BCS

3. Technology to Improve Service Delivery and Performance Measures

4. AVL Data – Dec. 2007 Current AVL System

5. New AVL Hardware Evaluation Dec. 2008 Testing New AVL Hardware

6. Project Scope Summary Implement AVL System for Fire Department Implement GPS Technology in all Fire Department Vehicles Enhance Mobile Application for all Fire Department Vehicles – In Vehicle Mapping – Wireless software updates – Enhanced CAD details and queries

7. System Overview EWDN Architectural Block Diagram Radio-IP Server 911 Dispatch Deccan Field Units MobileCOM, Maverick Mapping, Trimble GPS DRU MARVLIS AVL Server CAD/MobileCOM Distribution Server Impedance Monitor and AVL Playback

8. Project Budget Summary Fiscal YearAmountDescription FY07-FY08$364,650.00Tiburon MobileCOM Server Hardware and Software FY08-FY09 (1)$302,529.00MARVLIS AVL Server, Software, XML CAD Interface, Implementation Services and 1Y Maintenance FY08-FY09 (2)$832,887.30Tiburon MobileCOM MDC Software (Qty. 150), Maverick In-Vehicle Mapping, GPS Hardware, Install Services Total$1,500,066

9. Project Schedule Summary *Original schedule estimated completion mid-2009

10. Risks & Opportunities Risks: – Schedule delay of Enhanced Wireless Data System Migration Highlights and Opportunities: – Fire Dept. performed significant field testing of in- vehicle hardware, which allowed us to procure a more cost effective GPS/AVL/MDC solution – Able to procure in-vehicle mapping licenses for all Fire Dept. units

11. ProjectStatusTrendIssueCorrective Action Scope Schedule Cost Overall Slide 11 Overall Status GG YY GG GG Heavily reliant on EWDN Project Schedule Track and monitor progress with Dept of Technology and SFPD

12. Slide 12 Project Status Legend Scope Green Project scope (deliverables) completely defined. No scope change. Yellow Change within 10% of original scope Red Change over 10% of original scope. Need re-baseline. Schedule Green Project schedule completely defined. On track for scheduled completion Yellow Within 10% of scheduled completion Red Over 10% scheduled completion. Need re-baseline. Cost Green Completion within budget Yellow Completion within 10% of budget Red Completion over 10% of budget. Need re-baseline.

13. Slide 13 Overall Project Rating Legend ColorDefinition Green Less than 20% likelihood that an adverse event will occur that impacts scope, time or cost. Yellow 20% to 50% likelihood that an adverse event will occur that impacts scope, time or cost. Red Greater than 50% likelihood that an adverse event will occur that impacts scope, time or cost.