1. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Schematic description of the problem Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Mass transfer variation with permeability and porous layer thickness (RaT = 106, N = 10, Pr = 10, A = 2) Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Heat transfer variation with permeability and porous layer thickness (RaT = 106, N = 10, Pr = 10, A = 2, Le = 100) Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Flow structure around the first Nu number minimum: 5 × 10−8 < Da < 5 × 10−7; Δψ = 0.1 (RaT = 106, N = 10, xp = 0.1, Le = 100, Pr = 10, A = 2). For comparing the flow structures, the streamlines have been plotted using the maximum value of the ψmax for all cases (ψ = 0 at the walls and Δψ = 0.1) Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Heat transfer variation with permeability for different Lewis numbers (RaT = 106, N = 10, xP = 0.1, Pr = 10, A = 2) Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Heat transfer variation with permeability for different buoyancy ratios (RaT = 106, xP = 0.1, Pr = 10, Le = 100, A = 2) Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Geometric configuration of the problem Figure Legend:

8. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Marginal stability curves: comparison between the 1Ω and the 2ΩDB approaches for d ̂ =df*/dm*=0.08 and d ̂ =0.10 (Da = 7.4410−6) Figure Legend:

9. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Influence of the stress jump coefficient β for d ̂ =0.10 Da = 10−5, ɛ = 0.39 Figure Legend:

10. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Critical solutal Rayleigh number versus the thermal Rayleigh number, for three values of the depth ratio d ̂ Figure Legend:

11. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Wave number versus the thermal Rayleigh number, for three values of the depth ratio d ̂ Figure Legend:

12. Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Thermosolutal Natural Convection in Partially Porous Domains J. Heat Transfer. 2012;134(3):031013-031013-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005147 Influence of the thermal diffusivity ratio ɛ T for d ̂ =0.8 and different thermal Rayleigh numbers Figure Legend: