1. EVALUATION OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL REGION OFFICE WELL NETWORK FOR THE S AN J OAQUIN R IVER H YDROGEOLOGIC R EGION 2015 DWR G EOLOGY AND G ROUNDWATER C ONFERENCE

2. San Joaquin River Hydrogeologic Region Subbasins include: Modesto Turlock Merced Delta-Mendota Chowchilla Madera

3. Exceptions M ADERA /C HOWCHILLA S UBBASINS O AKDALE ID/S TANISLAUS T RIANGLE

4. SCRO Well Network Initiated in the 1950s Network updated through 1991 Verbal well owner permission No known previous analysis of network conducted

5. Previous SJRHR Well Network Designation # of wells Delta-Mendota 111 Los Banos-Grande71 Modesto-Turlock79 Oakdale ID68 Turlock ID202 Eastside WD19 Merced Bottoms86

6. Investigation 429 F IELD D ATA S HEET W ELL C OMPLETION R EPORT

7. Revisions Eliminated most wells where a log containing construction information could not be located. Wells with limited construction information were retained in few instances. Some wells without construction information were retained to maintain coverage if no others available.

8. Limitations Age of Well Completion Reports Non-standard format Difficult to read

9. Limitations cont. Illegible

10. Limitations cont. Missing details: Location Screened intervals Cased depths

11. Revised SJHR Well Run Designations Designation: # of wells Delta-Mendota 69 Modesto 27 Turlock West 38 Turlock East 24 Merced 42

12. Delta-Mendota D ELTA -M ENDOTA /L OS B ANOS -G RANDE D ELTA -M ENDOTA

13. Modesto O AKDALE I RRIGATION D ISTRICT M ODESTO

14. Turlock T URLOCK I RRIGATION D ISTRICT T URLOCK W EST

15. Turlock M ODESTO -T URLOCK T URLOCK E AST

16. Merced M ERCED B OTTOMS M ERCED

17. CASGEM Conformity Monitoring network being updated to CASGEM monitoring entity requirements. Eliminated duplicate wells measured by monitoring entities. Intended to compliment the CASGEM monitoring entity network for the subbasin.

18. Goals Three wells per quarter township density. – Appropriately spaced – Representing the major aquifers Renew written permission for existing wells and receive well owner permission for expansion.

19. SLDMWA & DWR Well Run D ELTA -M ENDOTA G ROUNDWATER S UBBASIN

20. STRGBA CASGEM & DWR Well Run M ODESTO G ROUNDWATER S UBBASIN

21. TGBA CASGEM & DWR Well Run T URLOCK G ROUNDWATER S UBBASIN

22. M ERCED G ROUNDWATER S UBBASIN MAGPI & DWR Well Run

23. Madera-Chowchilla Monitoring Group M ADERA & C HOWCHILLA G ROUNDWATER S UBBASINS

24. San Joaquin Hydrogeologic Region Monitoring Network S UBBASIN # OF WELLS Delta Mendota 236 Modesto81 Turlock 121 Merced89 Chowchilla 49 Madera 116

25. Region Network by Well Type CASGEM/C ONSTRUCTION DETAILS V OLUNTARY /M ISSING D ETAILS

26. Recognized Data Gaps Eastern margin of the Modesto, Turlock, and Merced subbasins: Thin alluvium/shallow bedrock Low population density Well clusters around artificial recharge zones (lakes, rivers)

27. Recognized Data Gaps Western Merced and Central Delta-Mendota subbasins: Wetlands and low lying areas Wildlife refuges, hunting clubs Sparse well coverage

28. Data Gap Study Reviewed Wellma database Eliminated from count: – Boring logs – Duplicates and multi- records – Test/Monitoring Wells – Cathodic Protection Wells – Sparging, vapor extraction, heat exchange, & remediation wells

29. Well Completion Report Count by Township

30. Area of Concern Corcoran Clay Large number of irrigation wells screened through the regional confining layer. Clustered in western Turlock and Modesto subbasins.

31. Distribution of Region Wells to Corcoran Clay

32. Next Phase Begin filling gap areas and updating permissions. Complete review for Tulare Lake HR and make revisions. Continuing monitoring in remote basins and expand into unmonitored basins.

33. Challenges Difficult to locate wells Falling water levels Dry or destroyed wells

34. Challenges Loss of access – Locked gates – Well houses – Wildlife Uncooperative well owners

35. Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) Requires GSAs to stabilize groundwater across the groundwater basins to January 1, 2015 levels. Most likely require GSA expansion of current monitoring networks. CASGEM status unknown until regulations finalized. Monitoring network will be adjusted once GSP submitted for each basin. Possible future role as verification of groundwater level information submitted by GSAs.

36. Questions?