1. Talking about the Scholarship Repository June 21, 2016 Charlotte Roh, University of San Francisco

2. Learning Objectives You should be able to  Demonstrate understanding of the main reasons why libraries support institutional repositories (background/history). 30 min  Answer questions about the Scholarship Repository. 30 min  Present on the Scholarship Repository. 30 min

3. What is the institutional repository?  Simple answer: It’s a place where USF can upload and view their scholarship.  Who is the audience?  Faculty and librarians  Graduate students  Undergraduates  Affiliated organizations  California and beyond …so basically, everyone.

4. Why do libraries support institutional repositories?

5. https://www.polleverywhere.com/free_text_polls/5FKKEjsZWqSflmM

6. The Problem https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/ apr/24/harvard-university-journal-publishers- prices http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2016/04/the_l awsuit_against_sci_hub_begs_the_question_why_are_academic_journals.ht ml

7. The Result http://arstechnica.co.uk/science/2015/11/entire-editorial-staff-of- elsevier-journal-lingua-resigns-over-high-price-lack-of-open-access/ The Right to Research Coalition was founded by students in the summer of 2009 to promote an open scholarly publishing system based on the belief that no student should be denied access to the articles they need because their institution cannot afford the often high cost of access.

9. Summary 1.Too expensive. 2.Barriers to research. 3.Technology enabled different models!

10. Why libraries and institutional repositories? Preservation Digital archive protocols Permanent URLs Academic libraries as secure institutions Access Scholars without subscription budgets International readers Practitioners and the public audience Impact Open access means higher citation rates Download counts can be included to support tenure and promotion Altmetrics can be counted within the university Future Use Available to future generations of scholars Non-exclusive license to university preserves author rights as well New/Old Roles for Libraries Trusted members of the academic community Committed to long-term preservation and access Know how to do metadata and search

11. Who We Are The University of San Francisco — a premier Jesuit university — is a reflection of the inclusive, inspirational, innovative city that surrounds it. We provide students from all backgrounds an education that is intensely personal and intellectually demanding. For us, reason, religion, science, and spirituality are complementary. Our students see the world with a sense of awe and wonder, and with a curiosity for answers to the world’s most complex questions. Our Core Values At USF, it’s about more than giving graduates a personal advantage. It’s about inspiring them to go forth and set the world on fire, to create a more humane, just, and sustainable world. To go forth and set the world on fire, to create a more humane, just, and sustainable world.

12. Learning Objectives You should be able to  Demonstrate understanding of the main reasons why libraries support institutional repositories (background/history). 30 min  Answer questions about the Scholarship Repository. 30 min  Present on the Scholarship Repository. 30 min

13. Common responses to the Scholarship Repository? https://www.polleverywhere.com/free_text_polls/K B5ljoBatFMC5lG

14. Responses to Scholarship Repository  What is it?  I don’t have time for this.  I already use Academia.edu.  This hurts my publisher.  Everyone who needs to read my work can find it already.  Nobody uses this. / Everyone uses Google.  This is great! I definitely plan on using it.

15. What is it? It’s what everyone is using to make their work publicly accessible!  Directory of Open Access Repositories: http://www.opendoar.org/countrylist.php http://www.opendoar.org/countrylist.php  Digital Commons: http://network.bepress.com/http://network.bepress.com/

16. I don’t have time for this. The scholarly work of USF is its intellectual wealth of the institution. Just hand us your CV and we’ll do the work for you. The Scholarship Repository includes  Faculty publications, presentations, conference papers, posters, handouts and educational materials  Data from research centers and outreach programs  Material from conferences, workshops, talks, and other events  Journals - faculty, graduate, and undergraduate

17. I already use Academia.edu. http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/2015/12/a-social-networking-site-is-not-an-open-access-repository/ Also see http://libguides.udayton.edu/ecommons/othermediahttp://libguides.udayton.edu/ecommons/othermedia

18. This hurts my publisher. Brian Nosek, a professor at the University of Virginia and director of the Center for Open Science, says, “Academic publishing is the perfect business model to make a lot of money. You have the producer and consumer as the same person: the researcher. And the researcher has no idea how much anything costs.” Schmitt, Jason. “Can’t Disrupt This: Elsevier and the 25.2 Billion Dollar A Year Academic Publishing Business.” Medium Dec 22, 2015 Also, see previous slides.

20. Everyone who needs to read my work can find it already. “The OA advantage is greater for the more citable articles, not because of a quality bias from authors self-selecting what to make OA, but because of a quality advantage, from users self- selecting what to use and cite, freed by OA from the constraints of selective accessibility to subscribers only. It is hoped that these findings will help motivate the adoption of OA self- archiving mandates by universities, research institutions and research funders.” - Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, Gingras Y, Carr L, et al. (2010) Self- Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636.

21. Nobody uses this. Everyone uses Google.  The price of journal databases  Global social justice  Author rights  Preservation for long term access (Google is not an archive.)  ….What else?

22. Learning Objectives You should be able to  Demonstrate understanding of the main reasons why libraries support institutional repositories (background/history). 30 min  Answer questions about the Scholarship Repository. 30 min  Present on the Scholarship Repository. 30 min

23. Outreach Questions  Who is the audience?  What are their needs?  What do you want the audience to do?  Why?  What are the challenges?  How can you address them?

24. Action points for faculty Negotiate your contracts with publishers Publish in open access journals Make your work available through the USF Scholarship Repository or other subject repositories Pass an open access policy at the department, college, or institutional level

25. How does this work? 1.We look up each published work on SHERPA/RoMEO and on publisher websites. SHERPA/RoMEO 2.If a policy can’t be found, we ask publishers for permission. 3.We upload the items that are permissible to upload. 4.We ask faculty to give us pre-print or post-print versions of their work to upload.