1. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 1 Inter-AS MPLS TE Requirements draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-01.txt IETF 58, Minneapolis 11-13-2003 Raymond Zhang, INFONET JP Vasseur, Cisco Kenji Kumaki, KDDI Paul Mabey, Qwest Nadim Constantine, INFONET Pierre Merckx, Equant Ting-Wo Chung, Bell Canada JL Le Roux, France Telecom Yonghwam Kim, SBC

2. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 2 Updates Updates in -01 based upon items identified in the meeting minutes in Vienna and some additional comments In 5.1.2, we incorporated: –Signal using AS numbers as lose hops or ASBR LSRs and record in the RRO the ASes traversed. –Explicit hops across other transiting AS, mainly e.g. for SP with multi-ASes –Exclude explicit or loose nodes during path setup Rearrange the wordings in 5.1.8 to 5.1.9 – document flows makes more sense. Added section 5.1.10.1. Inter-AS MPLS TE MIB Requirement

3. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 3 Updates In 5.2.2.1 on enforcement and 5.2.2.2 on policy re-write, changed SHOULD to MUST for triggering path error msgs for non-compliance or re-write. Added section 5.2.2.3. Inter-AS Traffic Policing Some minor editorial changes (nits) based upon Bert’s suggestion Updated contact info. for several co-authors. Updated all references to reflect recent reference draft/RFC updates Posted draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-01.txt on 10/26/03

4. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 4 Next Steps One additional point to be incorporated - be more specific on the scope of this draft –The draft is targeted at inter-AS TE requirements for packet- based IP/MPLS networks.

5. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 5 Next Steps This is the fifth revision since Oct/02 and 2 nd revision since it became a WG document. We will repost the document as -02 incorporating the point in the previous slide right after Minneapolis meeting And this -02 of the draft is ready for WG last call

6. 11/13/2003draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req- 01.txt 6 Questions ? And Thanks