Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the."— Presentation transcript:

1 Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the reauthorized ESEA AYP Update

2 Determining AYP Adequate Yearly Progress NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP): 1.Test participation (95%) 2.Graduation or attendance (90% of state average or growth) 3.Reading 4.Mathematics

3 Data must be disaggregated by the following subgroups (for test participation, reading, and mathematics): Determining AYP Adequate Yearly Progress  All students 40 Subgroups:  Economically disadvantaged students 40  American Indian/Alaska Native 40  Asian/Pacific Islander 40  Black, not of Hispanic Origin 40  Hispanic 40  White, not of Hispanic Origin 40  Students with disabilities (SwD) 50  Students with limited English proficiency (LEP) 40 Minimum cell size

4 Determining AYP Adequate Yearly Progress If minimum cell size IS reached... Hispanic LEP SwD As/ Pac.Black Am. In. District School ALL STUDENTS Eco Dis. White

5 Determining AYP Adequate Yearly Progress If minimum cell size IS reached... Hispanic As/ Pac.Black Am. In. School Eco Dis. White LEP District ALL STUDENTS SwD Eco Dis. White

6 Determining AYP Adequate Yearly Progress School District State

7 Proficient by 2013-14 = 100% % Proficient/Advanced Adequate Yearly Progress Accelerated annual gains beginning 2010-11 Wisconsin 61% 37% 0 20 40 60 80 100 2001-02 2002-032003-042004-052005-062006-072007-082008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-132013-14 Reading Mathematics 2004-05

8 The identification… Adequate Yearly Progress Missing AYP two consecutive years in: Test Participation Other Indicator Reading Mathematics Schools: SIFI Districts: DIFI

9 1 0 0 0 Test Participation Grad./Att. ReadingMathematics Adequate Yearly Progress schools 34 3 17 26 Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04 (as of November 2004) 51 schools and 1 district identified for improvement districts

10 Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04 (as of November 2004) Number of SIFI Schools by School Level 051015202530 Elementary Mid/Combo. High 25 17 9

11 Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04 (as of November 2004) SIFI Schools by Percent Free/Reduced Lunch 020406080100 Elementary Mid/Combo. High 43% 91% 93% State average= 20% State average= 30% State average= 40%

12 Adequate Yearly Progress Wisconsin SIFI/DIFI Data 2003-04 (as of November 2004) School improvement levels Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4 19 6 13 3 6 (Improved) 4 2

13 11 7 24 Test Participation Grad./Att. ReadingMathematics Adequate Yearly Progress schools 57 26 24 73 108 schools and 30 districts missed AYP districts Wisconsin AYP Data 2003-04 (as of November 2004)


Download ppt "Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google