Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPatrick Lawrence Modified over 8 years ago
1
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Schematic diagram of the experiment system: 1—compressed nitrogen cylinder; 2—manometer; 3—valves; 4—pressure maintaining valve; 5—rotameter; 6—Plexiglass square tank; 7—tripod; 8—lasers; 9—photodiodes; 10—sampling detector; 11— computer; and 12—CCD camera Figure Legend:
2
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Calibration curve of bubble terminal velocity in 93% Glycerin solution (uncertainty of data: ±2.1%) Figure Legend:
3
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Master curve of shifted CD based on 1.0% PAM (uncertainty of data: ±8.6%) Figure Legend:
4
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Master curve with shifted E based on 1.0% PAM (uncertainty of data:±6.9%) Figure Legend:
5
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Effect of bubble volume on bubble terminal velocity (uncertainty of data: ±7.8%) Figure Legend:
6
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Relationship between CD/Ar0.683 Eo−0.0931 and Re Figure Legend:
7
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Comparison between measured and predicted CD Figure Legend:
8
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Experimental Investigation for Bubble Rising in Non-Newtonian Fluids and Empirical Correlation of Drag Coefficient J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(2):021305-021305-7. doi:10.1115/1.4000739 Validity on present model in 93% glycerin solution Figure Legend:
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.