Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.

Published byDaniel Harris Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis."— Presentation transcript:

1 Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis

2 Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) Derby High School Results 2007 - 2011 Year Math % Goal Math % Proficient Science % Goal Science % Proficient Reading % Goal Reading% Proficient Writing% Goal Writing% Proficient 2007 Class of 2009 15.359.52069.114.765.13478.3 2008 Class of 2010 21.461.219.864.22174.335.287.6 2009 Class of 2011 24.26721.468.422.864.140.287.6 2010 Class of 2012 26.668.126.774.326.681.952.577.2 2011 Class of 2013 16.2 42.623.369.921.765.249.381.7 Average20.759.622.269.121.370.142.282.4

3 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test District Comparisons by District Reference Group (DRG)

4 District Math Goal Math Proficient Science Goal Science Proficient Reading Goal Reading Proficient Writing Goal Writing Proficient Derby 16.242.623.369.921.765.249.381.7 Male 2555.631.676.331.671.15078.9 Female 6.328.114.362.99.758.148.584.8 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Results Derby High School Sub-Group Disaggregate

5 District Math Goal Math Proficient Science Goal Science Proficient Reading Goal Reading Proficient Writing Goal Writing Proficient Derby 16.242.623.369.921.765.249.381.7 Black Results Not Presented For groups <20Results Not Presented For groups <20 Hispanic Results Not Presented For groups <20Results Not Presented For groups <20 White 21.152.628.282.128.274.464.184.6 Asian American Results Not Presented For groups <20Results Not Presented For groups <20 American Indian Results Not Presented For groups <20Results Not Presented For groups <20 2011Connecticut Academic Performance Test Results Derby High School Sub-Group Disaggregate

6 District Math Goal Math Proficient Science Goal Science Proficient Reading Goal Reading Proficient Writing Goal Writing Proficient Derby 16.242.623.369.921.765.249.381.7 Free/Reduced Lunch 7.726.913.353.315.457.739.375 Not Eligible 21.452.430.281.425.669.855.886 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Results Derby High School Sub-Group Disaggregate

7 What are we going to do about it? *Organized Curriculum *Engaging Instruction *Formalized Benchmarks *Aims Web *CMT *Study Island *Freshmen Academy *Modified Block

Download ppt "Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis."

Similar presentations

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card 2008-9 Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.

FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.
North Mason School District September 2, 2010. ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.

North Mason School District September 2, ◦ District 4 th and 5 th grade Reading scores are above statewide scores. ◦ District 4 th grade Writing.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard 1 2013 Status: Approaching 331.2 (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets 339.5 (2011) 336.1.

1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Drop Out Rates in Minnesota Principles of Urban Education (EDU 600) Augusto Vargas Paul Menard Samsam Metropolitan State University 9-9-2013.

Drop Out Rates in Minnesota Principles of Urban Education (EDU 600) Augusto Vargas Paul Menard Samsam Metropolitan State University
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.

Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?

DATA PRESENTATION February 5, 2008 ARE WE IMPROVING? WAS 2007 BETTER THAN 2006?
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year 2014-2015.

10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
261 2008-09 End of Year Report_060409 DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District 2008-09 Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)

End of Year Report_ DataSet 1 Lodi Unified School District Year-End Benchmark Assessment Results (Student Achievement Monitoring)
Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.

Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.
2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.

2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.
2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.

District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, 2008-09 Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.

Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/20071. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 

Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
College Comparisons. Mean Total Score by College (Possible Score Range 400 to 500) SSD = Total Scores for Colleges of Business, Education, Health and.

College Comparisons. Mean Total Score by College (Possible Score Range 400 to 500) SSD = Total Scores for Colleges of Business, Education, Health and.
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.

Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
 Student supports and interventions  Dropout prevention  Literacy  Transitions – to and from high school  Senior year  Teacher quality and professional.

 Student supports and interventions  Dropout prevention  Literacy  Transitions – to and from high school  Senior year  Teacher quality and professional.
2014-2015 MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.

MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google