3. Barrow County Schools AYP Results 2008-2009

4. 2008-2009 AYP Results 2002-20038 out of 13 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP 2003-200411 out of 13 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP 2004-200512 out of 13 schools met AYP System met AYP 2005-200614 out of 14 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP 2006-200710 out of 14 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP 2007-20086 out of 14 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP 2008-200911 out of 14 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP

5. 2008-2009 AYP Results State of Georgia 79.1% of Schools Met AYP 89.8% of Elementary Schools Met AYP 75.3% of Middle Schools Met AYP 47% of High Schools Met AYP

12. AYP Determination Steps Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient on each assessment for all groups. Check percent proficient on each assessment for all groups. Check for progress on additional indicator. Check for progress on additional indicator. elementary school: attendance middle school: attendance high school: graduation rate

13. Analysis of Barrow County Elementary School AYP Results 95 % Participation Math Reading/ELA Attendance AES BES BRES CLES HES KES SES YES Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

14. Analysis of Barrow County Middle School AYP Results 95 % Participation Math Reading/ELA 2 nd Indicator RMS WMS WBMS HMMS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

15. Analysis of Barrow County High School AYP Results WBHS AHS 95 % Participation Math ELA Graduation Rate Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes

16. Analysis of Barrow County System AYP Results System 95 % Participation Math ELA Second Indicator Yes No Yes Yes

17. System Did Not Meet AYP 50.4% of SWD met standards on the Math CRCT. Benchmark is 59.5% 69.8% of ED students and 59.6% of Black students met or exceeded standards on the Math EGHSGT. Benchmark is 74.9% WHY?

18. Highlights ELLs Met AYP in all areas. SWD improved from 44.9% to 50.4% on the Math CRCT ELLs improved from 58.6% to 68.9% on the Math CRCT EDs improved from 66% to 72% on the Math CRCT All students met AYP attendance goals. The graduation rate improved from 72.5% to 75.5%.

19. State Required Interventions for Schools No schools are on on the Needs Improvement List 1 st Year of Not Meeting AYP: No Intervention 2 nd Year of Not Meeting AYP: Supplemental Services (in the same content area)

20. State Required Interventions for Systems Our system is not on the Needs Improvement List 1st Year of Not Meeting AYP: No Intervention 2 nd Year of Not Meeting AYP: Develop and submit LEA Improvement Plan (in the same subject for 2 consecutive years at both elementary/middle and high school levels)

21. Questions and Answers