1. Michael Hopkins, P.E., Assistant Chief, DAPC Andrew Hall, Permit Manager, DAPC

2. Newburgh Steel Works, Cleveland circa 1893 Case Western Reserve Historical Society

3.  Statistics on current installation permit status  Installation Goals for 2011  Statistics on current operating permit status  Operating Permit Goals for 2011

5.  Reviewed data from Stars2 from November 2009 through October 2010  Looked at issuance of installation permits including GPs, PBRs, PTIs, PTIOs  Looked at the current workload of installation permits

6.  690 PBR accepted  13.5 days average processing

7.  8 % install permits issued were GPs  Issued 42 GP  29.7 days average processing

8.  506 Installation permits (GP & Non)  Included 1152 EUs  ~2 EU per Installation Permit  117.5 avg OEPA days  140.5 avg Total days

14.  Reduce workload to “no backlog” level  Reduce number of “old” permits  Meet 14-day Completeness review goal  Continue timely processing of CO reviews  Further develop high priority “high communication” process  Process Section Manager identified high priority permits using “high communication” process

15.  Tracked through Stars2 Report  Mgmt Reports…  Permits Status…  DO/Laa: select one  Types: PTI & PTIO  Reasons: Initial Installation & Chapter 31 Mod & Not Yet Assigned

16. DO/Laa Current Installation Workload* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaCurrent Workload“Old” Permits*2011 Goal 01 – CDO19230 02 - NEDO28430 03 - NWDO622230 04 - Toledo305 05 - SWDO305 06 - SEDO392030 07 - Portsmouth11610 08 - RAPCA7010 13 - Cleveland151 14 - HAMCO12015 15 - Canton9310 16 - Akron9110 Total21759200 *As of November 26, 2010, Old = DO/Laa/CO workflow >180

17.  Continue current practice of limited review and rapid turn-around (CO goal)  Develop guidance concerning when the “high communication” process is to be used, the processed used and a revised fee procedure (CO goal)  Develop guidance concerning processing of “old” permits

19.  NSR Permits: Number of applications rec’d for Initial Installation/CH31Mods are variable but follow historic trends  Title V Permits: fixed number  FEPTIO: fixed number  PTIO: fixed number or decrease

20. Input + Generation – Output – Consumption = Accumulation  Input: applications received  Generation: splitting of applications  Output : permits issued  Consumption : facility shutdowns  Accumulation : permit buildup within the system

21. DO/Laa Title V Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaTitle V Facilities2010 Finals Issued2011 Goal 01 – CDO55111 02 - NEDO1051221 03 - NWDO1272025 04 - Toledo2665 05 - SWDO1513 06 - SEDO81016 07 - Portsmouth1423 08 - RAPCA3266 13 - Cleveland48010 14 - HAMCO60812 15 - Canton2104 16 - Akron2435 Total61959121 *Final Title V permits issued as of November 26, 2010

22.  Initial Title V  Renewal Title V (Expired or Extended)  Sig Mod (9 month goal)  MPM (90 day goal)  APA  Off Permit Change  See TOPs Report, STARS2 Management Reports

23. DO/Laa FEPTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaFEPTIO Facilities2010 FinalFEPTIO2011 Goal 01 – CDO117523 02 - NEDO116223 03 - NWDO143129 04 - Toledo2305 05 - SWDO2405 06 - SEDO123025 07 - Portsmouth601 08 - RAPCA76215 13 - Cleveland56111 14 - HAMCO126625 15 - Canton2615 16 - Akron69714 Total90525181 *PTIO Renewal with “Draft/Final Issuance” as of Nov. 26, 2010

24. DO/Laa PTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals** DO/LaaPTIO Facilities2010 PTIOs2011 Goal 01 – CDO9203092 02 - NEDO9202992 03 - NWDO76916877 04 - Toledo238424 05 - SWDO1351014 06 - SEDO518952 07 - Portsmouth6617 08 - RAPCA4484745 13 - Cleveland6693767 14 - HAMCO7916979 15 - Canton271227 16 - Akron4463345 Total6191439619 *As of Nov. 26, 2010 ** Based on 10-yr Renewal Cycle

25.  Report Tree (Permit Classification): to identify facility classifications  Expiration Report: identify expired permits within selected time frames  Workload Trend Report: shows month-by- month permit applications rec’d/permits issued

26.  Questions?