Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities ………….1the federal funds market.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities ………….1the federal funds market."— Presentation transcript:

1 the analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities ………….1the federal funds market ………….4 sustainable cartels assignment six

2 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |1 the federal funds market time line FED commits funds F G with resulting market demand r ( F ) = [90 – 0.5 F G ] – 0.5( F 1 + F 2 ) ● this initial commitment of funds by FED basically “reduces” the market size left for the two banks market demand for funds is initially r ( F ) = 90 – 0.5 F ● where F is the total funds supplied to the market by the players F = F 1 + F 2 + F G the two banks form a cartel and supply together an amount F B r ( F G,F B ) = [90 – 0.5 F G ] – 0.5 F B ● the solution to this game follows the same logic as the solution without the FED ► What is cartel’s offer?  Marginal revenue. The cartel behaves as a monopolist (choosing F B ) that faces the demand r ( F ) = [90 – 0.5 F G ] – 0.5 F B. The marginal revenue is easy to find: MR B ( F B ) = [90 – 0.5 F G ] – F B  Profit maximizing condition. The condition for monopolist MR B ( F B ) = MC B ( F B ) with a zero marginal cost gives [90 – 0.5 F G ] – F B = 0  Cartel’s offer. From the profit maximizing condition: F B = 90 – 0.5 F G

3 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |2 the federal funds market ► What is FED’s offer?  There are two cases we consider - uninformed FED : the FED believes the two banks compete Cournot, thus the FED expects that, given FED’s supply F G the two banks will supply F 1 ( F G ) = 60 – F G /3 and F 2 ( F G ) = 60 – F G /3 - informed FED : the FED believes the two banks cooperate into a cartel, thus the FED expects that, given FED’s supply F G the two banks will supply together F B = 90 – 0.5 F G ► Uninformed FED  We saw in this case that the FED will supply F G = 120. However, the actual (and definitely not expected by FED) reaction from the banks is to supply F B = 90 – 0.5 F G = 30 with a resulting FFR of r ( F ) = 90 – 0.5( F G + F 1 + F 2 ) = 90 – 0.5(120 + 30) = 15.  Each bank’s profit is half of the cartel’s profit:  1 =  2 = 1/2  [ r(F B )  F B ] = 1/2  [15  30] = 225  Obviously the FED misses the target of 10 for the FFR because it does not anticipate correctly banks’ behavior.

4 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |3 the federal funds market ► Informed FED  The FED believes the two banks cooperate into a cartel, thus the FED expects that, given FED’s supply F G the two banks will supply together F B = 90 – 0.5 F G with a resulting FFR of r ( F ) = 90 – 0.5( F G + F 1 + F 2 ) = 90 – 0.5( F G + 90 – 0.5 F G ) = 45 – 0.25 F G  With a target of FFR * = 10 the FED solves the equation 45 – 0.25 F G = 10 with solution F G = 140  Each bank supplies: F 1 = F 2 = 1/2  [90 – 0.5 F G ] = 1/2  [90 – 0.5  140] = 10  Each bank’s profit is  1 =  2 = r(F)  F 1 = r(F)  F 2 = 10  10 = 100  Obviously the FED gets the target of 10 for the FFR because it does anticipate correctly banks’ behavior.

5 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |4 sustainable cartels ► TASK I: Cournot non-Cooperative Solution. Given the market demand P ( Q ) = 12 – Q, with Q = q 1 + q 2, the residual demands, marginal revenues and reaction functions are:  firm 1: residual demand P 1 ( q 1 | q 2 ) = (12 – q 2 ) – q 1 marginal revenue MR 1 ( q 1 | q 2 ) = (12 – q 2 ) – 2 q 1 reaction function (12 – q 2 ) – 2 q 1 = 0 gives q 1 ( q 2 ) = 6 – 0.5 q 2  firm 2: residual demand P 2 ( q 2 | q 1 ) = (12 – q 1 ) – q 2 marginal revenue MR 2 ( q 2 | q 1 ) = (12 – q 1 ) – 2 q 2 reaction function (12 – q 1 ) – 2 q 2 = 0 gives q 2 ( q 1 ) = 6 – 0.5 q 1  The two reaction functions are q 1 ( q 2 ) = 6 – 0.5 q 2 q 2 ( q 1 ) = 6 – 0.5 q 1 with Cournot non-cooperative solution q 1 ( nc ) = 4, q 2 ( nc ) = 4 P ( nc ) = 4,  1 ( nc ) = 16,  2 ( nc ) = 16

6 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |5 sustainable cartels ► TASK I: Cournot Cooperative (Cartel) Solution. Given the market demand P ( Q ) = 12 – Q, with Q = q 1 + q 2, the marginal revenue for a monopolist serving this market is: marginal revenue MR ( Q ) = 12 – 2 Q with Cournot cooperative solution Q ( c ) = 6, q 1 ( c ) = 3, q 2 ( c ) = 3 P ( c ) = 6,  1 ( c ) = 18,  2 ( c ) = 18 ► TASK I: Best Deviation to Cartel Solution. If firm 1 plays the cooperative (cartel) solution, i.e. q 1 ( c ) = 3, then firm 2’s best reaction to this is given by q 1 ( q 2 ( c )) = 6 – 0.5 q 2 ( c ) = 4.5 The results of the deviation are: q 1 ( c ) = 3, q 2 ( d ) = 4.5 P ( d ) = 4.5,  1 ( d ) = 13.5,  2 ( d ) = 20.25

7 microeconomic s the analytics of constrained optimal decisions assignment 6 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities  2016 Kellogg School of Management assignment 6 page |6 sustainable cartels ► TASK II:  Alternative 1. Given a discount rate r, firm 2 makes a profit (from deviating in the first period and then playing the non-cooperative Cournot solution) of  Alternative 2. Given a discount rate r, firm 2 makes a profit (from never deviating) of Firm 2 will prefer Alternative 2 to Alternative 1 if: that is ► Solution : whenever r < 0.89 firm 2 will not deviate (the discount rate is ”too small” which means “the future counts” and it’s better to be patient and wait for getting higher profits in the future).


Download ppt "The analytics of constrained optimal decisions microeco nomics spring 2016 the oligopoly model(I): competition in quantities ………….1the federal funds market."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google