1. RIO RANCHO PUBLIC SCHOOLS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS ADOPTION 2015-2016 MIDDLE SCHOOL ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING INTERVENTION Meeting 4 January 26, 2016 C and I: LaJuana Coleman, Jeanette Gonzales

2. GOALS  Evaluate instructional materials using IMET rubric and finalize ranking of materials available

3. Why Are We Here?  Finding the BEST Instructional Materials

4. ❖ Presume positive intentions. ❖ Come from a place of strength. ❖ Understand that those who work, learn. ❖ Look for solutions, not blame. ❖ Focus on systems, not people. ❖ Be honest. ❖ Recognize that everyone has expertise. ❖ Challenge ideas, not people. ❖ Share talk time. ❖ Respect our professional learning environment. Group Norms

5. Instructional Materials Adoption Procedures  Be Present  Be Engaged  Be Open  Be willing to Share

6. Where Are We Headed? Meeting DateMeeting Time September 22, 20158:30-3:30 October 29, 20158:30-3:30 November 19, 20158:30-3:30 January 26, 20158:30-3:30 February 23, 2015 (Publisher Presentations)8:30-3:30 March 23, 2016 (Parent, Community, RRPS Staff Review) 12:00 PM- 7:00 PM (Open House) April 7, 2016 (if needed)8:30-4:00

7. Agenda  1. Welcome, Norms, Review Goals and Purpose, Review Commitments and PARCC Data  2. Finish reviewing materials in groups with IMET rubric  3. Groups develop brief presentation to share out their significant findings based on their rubric topic for each publisher.  Lunch  4. Meet by Instructional Material/Publisher - all criteria represented  5. Meet by grade level and school level  6. Expert group members rank publisher based on their criterion  7. Check in on status of evaluation – rank publishers  8. Close with next steps

8. 5 Levels of Certainty:  1. Opinion  2. Experience  3. Local Evidence  4. Preponderance of Evidence  5. Mathematical Certainty

9. Taught Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum CCSS Written Assessed

10. Instructional Materials Priority Document

11. Reflection

12. Poll Everywhere Results  Based on the information that you currently have – please rank – 1-6 – 1 is highest and 6 is lowest. 1. Common Core Literature 2. Collections 3. My Perspectives 4. Pathways to College and Careers 5. Spring Board 6. Mirrors and Windows

13. GROUP ASSIGNMENTS Groups for Reviewing MS ELA Instructional Materials Group 1: Questions and TasksGroup 2: Speaking and ListeningGroup 3: Range and Quality of Texts Erin LuceroLuis VivirosCarlos Garcia Michelle ShortMandi KaufmanJill Beeman Arayna ArmijoMariah ChavezKristin Oliver Joann WondraTammy ThomasAngela Cobb Group 4: Scaffolding and SupportGroup 5: LanguageGroup 6: Writing to Sources & Research Kimm PlateroJulie PierceBeth Cramer Ashley GarzaDale FelicianoJay Tharinger BJ HartfordBetty ScheppmannCourtney Quinones Jennifer Molina

14. Understanding the IMET rubric  Part 1: Understanding and Meeting the Non-Negotiables  Part 2: Alignment Criterion (1-7)  Part 3: Grade level Instructional Materials Tool

15. Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool (IMET)  This ELA/Literacy IMET is designed to help educators determine whether or not instructional materials are aligned to the Shifts and major features of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). The substantial instructional Shifts (www.corestandards.org/other-resources/key-shifts- in-english-language-arts/) at the heart of the Common Core State Standards are:  Complexity: Regular practice with complex text and its academic language  Evidence: Reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence from text, both literary and informational  Knowledge: Building knowledge through content-rich non-fiction

16. Non-Negotiable 1:  Texts are worthy of student time and attention; they have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade, according to both quantitative and qualitative analyses of text complexity.

17. Non-Negotiable 2:  At least 80% of all questions in the submission are high-quality text-dependent and text-specific questions. The overwhelming majority of these questions are text-specific and draw student attention to the text.

18. ELA Instructional Materials Scoring Rubrics by Topic and Grade Level 1. Range and quality of texts 2. Questions and tasks support student learning 3. Writing to sources and research 4. Foundational Skills 5. Language 6. Speaking and listening 7. Scaffolding and supports

19. Core Instructional Materials Programs TitlePublisherType Pathways to College and Careers Expeditionary Learning and Wiley Press Text and Digital Mirrors and Windows EMC PublishingText and Digital CollectionsHoughton MifflinText and Digital Spring BoardThe College BoardText and Digital MyPerspectivesPearsonText and Digital Common Core Literature PearsonText and Digital System of CoursesPearsonAll Digital Study SyncMcGraw HillAll Digital

20. Reading Intervention Programs TitlePublisherType Language!Voyager Cambium Common Core Coach and Waggle Triumph Read 180Scholastic InsideNational Geographic

21. Group Review  Review the description and guiding statements for your group’s assigned criterion.  Review your evaluations of each publisher  Develop a brief 2-3 minute presentation for each publisher of your significant findings  Attempt consensus but if no consensus report as such

22. Lunch: 1 hour 10 minutes 22

23. Publisher Review Group 1: Pathways Group 2: MirrorsGroups 3: Collections ErinMichelleArayna LuisMandiMariah CarlosJillKristin KimmAshleyKimm JulieDale BethJayCourtney JoannTammyAngela BJJenniferBetty

24. Publisher Review Group 4: Spring Board Group 5: My Perspectives Groups 6: Common Core Literature ErinAraynaMichelle MandiMariahLuis KristinCarlosJill Ashley Kimm JulieDaleJulie JayCourtneyBeth TammyJoannAngela BJBettyJennifer

25. Grade Level Discussion  In your grade level groups, share out your significant findings  Look for common ground  Look for areas of disagreement

26. School Level Discussion  In your school groups share your significant findings  Look for common ground  Look for areas of disagreement  Remember – you will be ultimately voting by school block

27. Publisher Rankings Tallied by Criterion  Go back to your Expert Group and have final discussions and each member rank the publishers for YOUR criteria.

28. Closing Comments…  All minutes and handouts will be posted for all staff to review  Additional readings may be required in preparation for future meetings  Items to bring to each meeting  Copy of CCSS-ELA  Readings and resources provided during committee meetings  Rubrics  Next meeting February 23, 2016 – Publishers Presentations