Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArabella Burns Modified over 8 years ago
1
Dividing Up the Work / production workshop / february 2009 Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Copyright © 2009 The Regents of the University of Michigan
2
U-M process dScribes your process
3
convert people OER curriculum materials c into Producing OER. Who are these people?
4
U-M OER life cycle. Authoring Clearing Editing Archiving Publishing various techniques & tools OERca software authoring tools Open.Michigan & eduCommons DSpace (?)
5
Publishing U-M OER. http://michigan.educommons.net/medical-school/ http://open.umich.eduhttp://open.umich.edu/
6
Publishing U-M OER.
11
cost access to faculty scale refresh rate How it’s being done, elsewhere. Traditional OCW/OER publication model Staff Centric Retroactive Challenges
12
OER production challenges: cost scale access to faculty content delivery metadata refresh rate active vs. retroactive publishing defining OER as a service What we have experienced.
13
how else can we do this?
14
U-M process dScribes your process
15
goals: scalable sustainable participatory approach: automate and simplify a complex process leverage capacity of institutional technologies and talents dScribe publishing model
16
and a team of U-M OER specialists... for use by students, educators and self-learners... Motivated students... collaborate with faculty... to gather, review, edit, and publish course materials... worldwide.
17
digital & distributed Scribes motivated students who: organize, clear, tag course materials are familiar with technology and software learn about intellectual property & copyright engage with content in new ways “dScribes”
18
dScribe Publishin g Process roles dScribe2 dScribe instructor faculty transfers course material to dScribe dScribe attends training course led by dScribe2 dScribe identifies & documents potential IP issues Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan OER team reviews & clears IP issues clear IP BY: Garin Fons, Pieter Kleymeer characters by Ryan Junell dScribe makes necessary edits to course material Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan faculty reviews material: publish to U-M OER site Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan publish to OER site faculty & dScribe2 connect: license material as OER faculty & dScribe2 recruit dScribe
19
dScribe cast of characters dScribeFacultydScribe2
20
license material That’s easy!
21
Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for this course I’ll do it! select a dScribe
22
copyright open resources dScribe training course fun! decision trees
23
transfer material Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michigan
24
Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michigan Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michig an vet material OERca: Content & Decision Management Software
25
OERca
26
Modeling workflow
27
Content Processing Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michig an review material Where does this image come from? OERca: Content & Decision Management Software
28
Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michigan edit material
29
final review Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michigan Looks good!
30
publication open.michiga n Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michig an
31
dScribe Publishin g Process roles dScribe2 dScribe instructor faculty transfers course material to dScribe dScribe attends training course led by dScribe2 dScribe identifies & documents potential IP issues Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan OER team reviews & clears IP issues clear IP BY: Garin Fons, Pieter Kleymeer characters by Ryan Junell dScribe makes necessary edits to course material Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan faculty reviews material: publish to U-M OER site Class #1 Agenda: find dScribe for open.michi gan publish to OER site faculty & dScribe2 connect: license material as OER faculty & dScribe2 recruit dScribe
32
benefits to students: master course content learn about copyright and copyleft establish unique connection w/ faculty potential to get course credit collaborate w/ other dedicated classmates make resources available to everyone dScribe publication model
33
benefits to faculty: students in course know best! establishing unique connection w/ students quality assurance of materials obtain user feedback on content >> improve content dScribe publication model
34
issues we have noted: difference between student quality and faculty quality of work limited expertise in subject area limited time to devote to OER production difficult to obtain the right balance of incentives for participation and production dScribe publication model
35
U-M process dScribes your process
36
We were made by Ryan Junell
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.