1. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 Schematics of (a) conventional and composite TEDs with (b) constant and (c) variable cross-sectional area interconnectors Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 Thermal and electrical resistance networks of (a) conventional and composite TE leg with (b) constant and (c) variable cross- sectional area interconnectors Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 Thermal interface conditions Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 The comparison of present model results with numerical simulations P 0,max of conventional TED for different (a) thermal and (b) electrical contact resistance values Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 The response of conventional TED's (a) internal resistance (b) junctions temperature difference and (c) heat input for different electrical and thermal contact resistances and TE leg heights Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 The response of conventional TED's (a) power output and (b) efficiency for different electrical and thermal contact resistances and TE leg heights Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 Effects of hot and cold side convective heat transfer coefficients on conventional TED's (a) hot junction temperature, (b) cold junction temperature, (c) temperature difference, (d) total internal resistance, (e) power output, and (f) thermal efficiency Figure Legend:

8. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 The thermoelectric performance of composite TED for various semiconductor slice thickness and convective heat transfer coefficient values Figure Legend:

9. Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Convective Heat Transfer and Contact Resistances Effects on Performance of Conventional and Composite Thermoelectric Devices J. Heat Transfer. 2014;136(10):101401-101401-11. doi:10.1115/1.4028021 Influence of interconnector size on the performance of composite TEDs for various leg heights Figure Legend: