Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession."— Presentation transcript:

1 2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession

2 2012 Compensation Study Results  Summary of Results  Overview of the Process  Benefit Results  Salary Results

3 RESULTS Summary  Below Market  Salaries  Retirement Plan Design L7  Above Market  Employee Contributions – Insurance  Insurance Plan Design – Deductibles/Copays  Holidays  Leave Maximum Accruals & Pay-Out  Sick Leave Buy-Back Program  Equal Market  Retirement – Defined Benefit Plan  Tuition  Leave Annual Accruals

4 Compensation Study Overview  Determine Comparators  Job Description Review  External Equity  Internal Equity

5 MunicipalGeneral Industry & Other Determine Comparators  Arnold (pop 20,808)  Ballwin (pop 30,404)  Chesterfield (pop 47,484)  Creve Coeur (pop 17,833)  Lake St. Louis (pop 14,545)  Manchester (pop 18,074)  O’Fallon (pop 80,860)  St. Charles City (pop 65,794)  St. Charles County (pop 360,485)  St. Peters (pop 52,575)  SLACMA  SLAPCA  Occupational Employment Statistics (DOL & BLS)  Duckett Creek

6 Job Description Review & Update  123 Job Descriptions were reviewed  Five Levels of Review  Employee  Supervisor  Department Director  Human Resources  Final Department Director  Focus of Review  Essential Duties & Responsibilities  Skills & Qualifications  Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act  Compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act

7 Job Description Review & Update  Standard Elements Added for Performance Review  Customer Service  Policy Compliance  Cooperation  Employee Development  Performance Management  Purchasing  Budgeting

8 External Equity Process  Benefit Survey  General Industry Data – BLS Employee Contributions & Copays  Health Insurance Plan Design  Spousal Surcharge  Salary Survey  General Industry Data – DOL and BLS  Positions Matched to Job Description NOT Title

9 Internal Equity Process  Market Minimum Salary Grade Established  Minimum of Municipal Comparators  Median of DOL for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area Less 20%  Remove the High/Low  Place in Closest Grade  Grade Placement Internal Review  Director Positions Reviewed by Mayor and Acting City Administrator  Positions below Director Level Reviewed by Directors

10 Benefit Review History  Medical Insurance  Contributions and Plan Design  Dental Insurance  Contributions and Plan Design  Vision Insurance  Life Insurance  Long Term Disability  Flexible Spending Accounts  Employee Assistance Program  Retirement  Tuition Assistance  Sick Leave Buy-Back – Included in Union Agreement  Sick Leave Pay-Out  Leave Accruals

11 Areas of Special Interest  Spousal Surcharge  Not Substantiated by Market Review  Self Funded Program  6 Comparators – Self-Funded  Average Stop Loss Level $130,000 – Wentzville $75,000  2 Comparators – Insurance Pool  2 Comparators – Fully Insured  LAGERS Retirement Program  7 of 9 Comparators Offer LAGERS (Defined Benefit)  1 Offers a Lower level Plan Design than Wentzville  6 Offer a Higher Level Plan Design than Wentzville  2 of 9 Comparators Offer 457 b Plan (Defined Contribution)  Note the funding levels average 8% of salary  1 Comparator Did not Report  General Industry  Funding levels average 6% of salary – no limit on employee contribution

12 Benefit Results 2012 COMPENSATION STUDY SUMMARY OVERALL MARKET COMPARISON FACTOR WENTZVILLE CURRENT COMPARE TO WENTZVILLE MARKET +INCREASE/-DECREASE TO MEET MARKET PEPM BASE SINGLE HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$0> $38 BASE FAMILY HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$10> $225 ENHANCED SINGLE HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$60> $62 ENHANCED FAMILY HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$160> $264 SINGLE DENTAL CONTRIBUTION$0> $4 FAMILY DENTAL CONTRIBUTION$5> $30 SINGLE VISION CONTRIBUTION$0> $6 LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE ONLY$0= FSA ALLOWED$1,500< $2,830 DEPENDENT CARE ALLOWED$5,000= EAP$0= LAGERS$0= TUITION ASSISTANCE MAX$2,500= SICK LEAVE BUY-BACK$0 3 comparators offer an incentive SICK LEAVE PAY-OUT720 hours 4 comparators offer a similar program SPOUSAL SURCHARGE$0= INDIVIDUAL DEDUCTIBLE$0> $1,000 FAMILY DEDUCTIBLE$0> $2,000 INDIVIDUAL OUT OF POCKET MAX$1,500= FAMILY OUT OF POCKET MAX$3,000> $3,500 OFFICE VISIT COPAY$25= SPECIALIST COPAY$25> $40 EMERGENCY ROOM COPAY$150> $250 URGENT CARE COPAY$50=

13 Salary Review History - Matrix  Salary Matrix  Grade Established for Each Position  Minimum – New Hire Rate  Midpoint – Average Market Value for Experienced Individual  Maximum – Highest Achievable Salary w/o Promotion

14 Salary Review History – Current Pay Plan  Annual Market Pay Adjustments  Given Across the board Annually Based on Budget  Employees on progressive discipline DO Not Receive Increase  Promotion  Individuals Promoted receive Minimum of new Grade or 0-7% per grade increased  Individuals Serving Temporarily Receive Increase to Minimum  New Hires  Starting pay from Minimum to Midpoint – CA Approval  Special Adjustments – NEVER UTILIZED  Increase Outside of Annual Adjustment or Promotional Increase  Requires Written Documentation of Superior Performance  Requires Consensus of ALL Department Directors

15 Salary Review History  2010 Last Study Implemented  Market Adjustment  Recommended 2.5%  Budgeted 1.5%  No Grade/Range Adjustment  Internal Equity Adjustments  Recommended 2.5%  Budgeted 0%  Adjustments to Minimum  Implemented  2011  Average Comparator 2.01%  Budgeted 0%  No Grade/Range Adjustment  2012  Average Comparator 1.7%  Budgeted 0%  No Grade/Range Adjustment

16 Salary Results  Grade Minimum Established  Average Grade Minimum for Comparators was Established  Position Match – 5 or more comparators  Position Non-Match – Less than 5 comparators  The High and Low were removed from the data  Range Placement Review  Human Resources Review – External Equity  Positions with Match were placed in the closest Grade either up or down  Positions with No Match were left in current Grade or adjusted with Job families  Additional Review – Internal Equity  Mayor and Acting City Administrator Reviewed Director Level Positions  Directors Reviewed Positions Below Director Level  Final Range Placement

17 Salary Results SALARY MARKET ADJUSTMENTS0%< 3.37% SALARY RANGE MINIMUMS < SALARY INTERNAL EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS<

18 Cost Models Meet Average Market (ESTIMATES ONLY)  Benefit Contributions to Meet Market  Health/Dental/Vision - $450,000  Benefit Plan Design Changes to Meet Market  Several Options w/ Estimated Savings of $100,000-$700,000 Annually  Self Insurance Pools  Fully Insured Plans  High Deductible Plans  Continue Self Funded Plan – Increase Stop Loss Level, Change Plan Design to Meet Market

19 Option #1Option #2 Cost Models to Meet Average Market (ESTIMATES ONLY)  Adjustments to Minimum in Recommended Pay Grades - $188,000 – plus  Internal Equity Adjustment –  Not to Exceed Midpoint A.2% - $287,000 B.2.5% - $359,000 C.3.0% - $431,000 D.3.25% - $467,000 E.3.5% - $503,311 F.3.75% - $539,263 G.4.0% - $575,214  Market Adjustment Only - $391,000 - plus  Adjust to Minimum - $72,000 - plus  Internal Equity Adjustment  Not to Exceed Midpoint A.2% - $287,000 B.2.5% - $359,000 C.3.0% - $431,000 D.3.25% - $467,000 E.3.5% - $503,311 F.3.75% - $539,263 G.4.0% - $575,214

20 Next Steps  Mid Year Budget  Requested Positions  Eliminate Lieutenant Support Services  Add - Sergeant – Professional Standards  Add - Sergeant – Special Services  Add – Communications Officer  Unfreeze – Records Clerk  Unfreeze – Code Compliance Inspector  Unfreeze – Building Safety Inspector  Add – Public Information Officer (Midyear or 2013)  Sick Buy Back Program  Included in the Union Agreement  2013 Budget Preparations  Insurance Renewal – Plan Design Changes  Employee Contribution Amounts  Salary Adjustments  Additional Personnel Requests

21 HR Next Steps  Position Appeal Process for Employees  Develop a Pay for Performance Plan  Update Policies  Review Leave Program

22 Questions?

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38 SUMMARY HISTORY OF CITY FUNDING LEVELS FOR BENEFITS 20062007200820092010201120122013 MEDICAL EE (PEPM)$380 $405$396$474 $520 MEDICAL FAMILY (PEPM)$942 $1014$1016$1336 $1435 DENTAL EE (PEPM)$25$20 $25 DENTAL FAMILY (PEPM)$65$50 $82 VISION EE (PEPM)$4 LIFE EE (PER $1000 SALARY)$2 LONG TERM DISABILITY (PER $100 SALARY)----$.42 FSA-------- DEPENDENT CARE-------- EAP (PEPM) RETIREMENT REGULAR (% OF SALARY)8.20%7.60% 8.60%9.60% 9.80%9.30% RETIREMENT POLICE (% OF SALARY)8.50%8.10%7.90%8.90%9.90% 10.40%9.80% TUITION, SICK LEAVE BUY BACK, SICK LEAVE BUY OUT, VACATION LEAVE PAYOUT ARE BASED ON UTILIZATION

39


Download ppt "2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google